[Bug]: T3 Connect doc says held webhooks are kept per environment, but the relay keeps one inbox per link
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- #17413 de @macodev00 — cerrado sin fusionar
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 1/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 83/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- documentation
Línea de trabajo
Empieza por las líneas 13–30 de docs/internals/t3-connect.md y, después, compara el comportamiento por enlace descrito en HookInbox.ts, deploymentConfig.ts, HeldHooks.ts y Api.ts. Actualiza los párrafos sobre los webhooks retenidos para describir con precisión el almacenamiento por enlace, los límites, el orden y las condiciones de eliminación, incluida la opción de no retenerlos. Ejecuta las pruebas del relay enumeradas en el issue; el trabajo estará terminado cuando la documentación coincida con el comportamiento probado.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Before submitting
- I searched existing issues and did not find a duplicate.
- I included enough detail to reproduce or investigate the problem.
Area
Docs
Steps to reproduce
Summary: The held-webhooks paragraphs of docs/internals/t3-connect.md describe the relay's offline webhook store as one Durable Object per environment, deleted "when no user has the environment linked", with "per-environment order, caps, and retry timing". The relay actually keeps one HookInboxObject per managed link (one account's link of one environment), named by that link's endpoint key. When two accounts link the same environment, each link gets its own inbox, caps and ordering, and unlinking deletes only the unlinking account's held requests. The doc also omits that turning hold_webhooks_while_offline off deletes what is already held. This is a documentation defect only; the relay's per-link design is the one the HookInbox.ts, HookInboxObject.ts and deploymentConfig.ts comments describe and the relay tests exercise. Related but separate: #16988 covers the wrong :environmentId path segment in lines 7-8 of the same doc; this report covers lines 13-30 only.
- On the
mainbuild, readdocs/internals/t3-connect.mdlines 13-30. - Read the inbox naming:
infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInbox.tslines 17-21 andinfra/relay/src/worker.tslines 246-253, wherehold,wakeandclearall callhookInboxes.getByName(endpointKey). - Read what an endpoint key identifies:
infra/relay/src/deploymentConfig.tslines 128-132, andinfra/relay/src/environments/ManagedEndpointProvider.tslines 998-1022, where the tunnel name's hash is a SHA-256 ofmanagedEndpointDigestInput(namespace, userId, environmentId). - Read when held requests are deleted:
infra/relay/src/http/Api.tslines 539-558 (unlink clears only the unlinking link's endpoint key) andinfra/relay/src/hooks/HeldHooks.tslines 95-126 (opting out clears only the caller's own links' endpoint keys). - Run the relay tests that exercise this behavior; the command and its output (per-test durations removed) are under Logs or stack traces.
Expected behavior
docs/internals/ records architectural decisions and constraints a maintainer would otherwise get wrong (repository AGENTS.md, Documentation section). The held-webhooks paragraphs should therefore name the unit the relay actually stores, orders and caps held requests by, and when it deletes them: one inbox per managed link (endpoint key), deleted when that link is unlinked, when its environment opts out of holding, after 24 hours, or once delivered.
Actual behavior
The doc text on the main build:
16: raw request, including the hook token in the path, in a Durable Object for
17: that environment, with SQLite storage. ...
20: relay to deliver right away. Requests are deleted once the environment
21: answers, after 24 hours, or when no user has the environment linked. ...
28: read-once bodies of up to 1 MiB that need per-environment order, caps, and
29: retry timing. Queues cap messages at 128 KB and cannot hold one environment's
30: requests back while it is away.
The code on the same build:
infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInbox.tslines 17-21: "Each managed endpoint's requests live in its ownHookInboxObject, named by endpoint key".infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInboxObject.tsline 27: "One per managed endpoint, addressed by endpoint key."infra/relay/src/deploymentConfig.tslines 128-132: "The hash covers user and environment, so one key names exactly one link, unlike the environment id, which any account can claim."infra/relay/src/hooks/HeldHooks.tslines 95-98, onownEndpointKeys: "The environment id alone would also match other accounts' links of it."setHoldWhileOffline(lines 118-126) clears each own endpoint key's inbox when holding is turned off;wake(lines 128-138) also works per endpoint key.infra/relay/src/http/Api.tslines 539-558, in unlink: "Requests held for this link's endpoint go with it." It callsinbox.clear({ endpointKey })for the unlinking account's endpoint only.infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInboxStore.tslines 17-27: the 24-hour TTL and the 1,000-request, 50 MiB and 100-per-hook caps are enforced inside eachHookInboxObject, so per endpoint key. The comments on these constants still say "one environment".
The step 5 test run passed; its output is under Logs or stack traces.
The HeldHooks fixture links one environment to two accounts with distinct endpoint keys (and distinct environment public keys), and opting out clears only the caller's endpoint key; the Api test shows unlink clearing only the unlinked link's endpoint key. Storage, caps and unlink deletion are therefore per link. Opting out clears every active link proven by the calling environment's key (infra/relay/src/environments/EnvironmentLinks.ts lines 374-404 and 432-445), which is still per link rather than every account's link of the environment id. The doc's per-environment description is wrong in three places: the storage unit (line 17), the deletion condition (lines 20-21), and the rationale (lines 28-30).
Evidence
- Expected source: repository
AGENTS.md, Documentation section (docs/internals/records decisions and hard-to-discover constraints), together with the relay's own contract in theHookInbox.tsanddeploymentConfig.tscomments cited above. - Failure source:
docs/internals/t3-connect.mdlines 13-30, compared withinfra/relay/src/worker.tslines 246-253,HeldHooks.tslines 95-138 andApi.tslines 539-558. - Evidence provenance: observed
- Local verification: reproduced
- Reproduction completeness: complete
The mismatch between the doc and the code was established by reading both on the main build. Per-link clearing was observed by running the existing relay unit tests, which use a mocked inbox. That HookInboxObject instances are named by endpoint key comes from reading worker.ts. A deployed relay with two accounts linking one environment was not exercised. Some relay code comments use the same per-environment wording as the doc: HookInboxStore.ts lines 11-21 and HookInbox.ts line 25 ("the environment's inbox"). git blame shows lines 13-30 unchanged since #15487 added them, and HookInbox.ts in that same change already named inboxes by endpoint key, so the doc has never matched the code.
Restoration check
Failing: docs/internals/t3-connect.md says held requests are stored in a Durable Object per environment, deleted when no user has the environment linked, with per-environment order and caps. Passing: the doc identifies the managed link (endpoint key) as the unit of storage, ordering and caps, and states deletion conditions that match Api.ts unlink and HeldHooks.setHoldWhileOffline. The step 5 tests still pass, showing the doc was changed to match the relay rather than the reverse.
Triage assessment
- Impact level: P3
- Assessment status: supported
- Impact basis: Only internal maintainer documentation is wrong; relay behavior is unaffected. A reader would misjudge which held requests survive another account's unlink and how caps are shared, but nothing in the product follows this text.
- Workaround status: available
- Workaround basis: The comments in
HookInbox.tslines 17-21,HookInboxObject.ts,deploymentConfig.ts,HeldHooks.tsandApi.ts, thegetByName(endpointKey)calls inworker.ts, and the relay tests show the per-link behavior today; a reader should not rely on the per-environment wording in theHookInboxStore.tscomments.
Impact
Cosmetic issue
Version or commit
main @ 3143335fc3a568cbbb5174764961889272135cb9 (2026-10-07); doc and relay hook code identical in v0.0.46-nightly.20261007.2787
Environment
- The latest stable release,
v0.0.45, predates the hold-while-offline feature (#15487), so it does not contain this text. - Node 22.23.2, pnpm 11.10.0, relay tests run with
npx vp test runininfra/relay.
Logs or stack traces
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
cd infra/relay
npx vp test run src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts src/http/Api.test.ts -t "own endpoints|unlinked endpoint|wakes the caller" --reporter=verbose
✓ src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts > HeldHooks > opting out clears only the caller's own endpoints
✓ src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts > HeldHooks > wakes the caller's ready endpoints and reports whether anything was waiting
✓ src/http/Api.test.ts > relay environment unlink > drops the unlinked endpoint's held webhooks, even if clearing fails
Test Files 2 passed (2)
Tests 3 passed | 33 skipped (36)
Screenshots, recordings, or supporting files
No response
Workaround
The comments in HookInbox.ts lines 17-21, HookInboxObject.ts, deploymentConfig.ts, HeldHooks.ts and Api.ts, the getByName(endpointKey) calls in worker.ts, and the relay tests show the per-link behavior today; a reader should not rely on the per-environment wording in the HookInboxStore.ts comments.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 24.8k
- Forks
- 6.4k
- Merge medio
- 2 h 58 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 480
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de pingdotgg/t3code
-
accepted bug via-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 69/100
pingdotgg/t3code#20931 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug via-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
pingdotgg/t3code#20128 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug]: T3_CODE_ORCHESTRATION_INSTRUCTIONS has no carve-out for user- or repo-mandated CLI review workflows (unlike T3_CODE_BROWSER_TOOL_INSTRUCTIONS)Posiblemente ocupada @nivethass15102007-tech la tomó hace 2 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
pingdotgg/t3code#19908 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
accepted bug via-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
pingdotgg/t3code#19536 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de pingdotgg/t3code
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
jbacalso24/mimry#459 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
architecture help wanted hive/claimed-by-architect origin/architect stage/030-pr-in-progress tech-debt
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
kubestellar/console#24422 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area: backends type: docs
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 83/100
schlessera/brain-kit#2383 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent duplicate providers tool triaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día