Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

[Bug]: T3 Connect doc says held webhooks are kept per environment, but the relay keeps one inbox per link

オープン 初心者向け
#16,995 コメント 1 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

@macodev00 がすでに取り組んでいます。

2026年10月9日 から。

  • #17413 @macodev00 による — オープン

評価

難易度
1/5
見積もり時間
1〜3時間
初心者へのやさしさ
83/100
issue の種類
ドキュメント
明瞭さ
明確に書かれている
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
typescript
領域
documentation

調査の方向性

まず docs/internals/t3-connect.md の13~30行目を確認し、次に HookInbox.ts、deploymentConfig.ts、HeldHooks.ts、Api.ts に記載されたリンクごとの動作を比較します。保留中のwebhookに関する段落を更新し、リンクごとの保存、上限、順序、削除条件を正確に記述してください。保留を無効にする場合も含めます。issueに記載されたrelayのテストを実行します。ドキュメントがテスト済みの動作と一致すれば完了です。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

documentation via-triage
Before submitting
  • I searched existing issues and did not find a duplicate.
  • I included enough detail to reproduce or investigate the problem.
Area

Docs

Steps to reproduce

Summary: The held-webhooks paragraphs of docs/internals/t3-connect.md describe the relay's offline webhook store as one Durable Object per environment, deleted "when no user has the environment linked", with "per-environment order, caps, and retry timing". The relay actually keeps one HookInboxObject per managed link (one account's link of one environment), named by that link's endpoint key. When two accounts link the same environment, each link gets its own inbox, caps and ordering, and unlinking deletes only the unlinking account's held requests. The doc also omits that turning hold_webhooks_while_offline off deletes what is already held. This is a documentation defect only; the relay's per-link design is the one the HookInbox.ts, HookInboxObject.ts and deploymentConfig.ts comments describe and the relay tests exercise. Related but separate: #16988 covers the wrong :environmentId path segment in lines 7-8 of the same doc; this report covers lines 13-30 only.

  1. On the main build, read docs/internals/t3-connect.md lines 13-30.
  2. Read the inbox naming: infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInbox.ts lines 17-21 and infra/relay/src/worker.ts lines 246-253, where hold, wake and clear all call hookInboxes.getByName(endpointKey).
  3. Read what an endpoint key identifies: infra/relay/src/deploymentConfig.ts lines 128-132, and infra/relay/src/environments/ManagedEndpointProvider.ts lines 998-1022, where the tunnel name's hash is a SHA-256 of managedEndpointDigestInput(namespace, userId, environmentId).
  4. Read when held requests are deleted: infra/relay/src/http/Api.ts lines 539-558 (unlink clears only the unlinking link's endpoint key) and infra/relay/src/hooks/HeldHooks.ts lines 95-126 (opting out clears only the caller's own links' endpoint keys).
  5. Run the relay tests that exercise this behavior; the command and its output (per-test durations removed) are under Logs or stack traces.
Expected behavior

docs/internals/ records architectural decisions and constraints a maintainer would otherwise get wrong (repository AGENTS.md, Documentation section). The held-webhooks paragraphs should therefore name the unit the relay actually stores, orders and caps held requests by, and when it deletes them: one inbox per managed link (endpoint key), deleted when that link is unlinked, when its environment opts out of holding, after 24 hours, or once delivered.

Actual behavior

The doc text on the main build:

16: raw request, including the hook token in the path, in a Durable Object for
17: that environment, with SQLite storage. ...
20: relay to deliver right away. Requests are deleted once the environment
21: answers, after 24 hours, or when no user has the environment linked. ...
28: read-once bodies of up to 1 MiB that need per-environment order, caps, and
29: retry timing. Queues cap messages at 128 KB and cannot hold one environment's
30: requests back while it is away.

The code on the same build:

  • infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInbox.ts lines 17-21: "Each managed endpoint's requests live in its own HookInboxObject, named by endpoint key". infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInboxObject.ts line 27: "One per managed endpoint, addressed by endpoint key."
  • infra/relay/src/deploymentConfig.ts lines 128-132: "The hash covers user and environment, so one key names exactly one link, unlike the environment id, which any account can claim."
  • infra/relay/src/hooks/HeldHooks.ts lines 95-98, on ownEndpointKeys: "The environment id alone would also match other accounts' links of it." setHoldWhileOffline (lines 118-126) clears each own endpoint key's inbox when holding is turned off; wake (lines 128-138) also works per endpoint key.
  • infra/relay/src/http/Api.ts lines 539-558, in unlink: "Requests held for this link's endpoint go with it." It calls inbox.clear({ endpointKey }) for the unlinking account's endpoint only.
  • infra/relay/src/hooks/HookInboxStore.ts lines 17-27: the 24-hour TTL and the 1,000-request, 50 MiB and 100-per-hook caps are enforced inside each HookInboxObject, so per endpoint key. The comments on these constants still say "one environment".

The step 5 test run passed; its output is under Logs or stack traces.

The HeldHooks fixture links one environment to two accounts with distinct endpoint keys (and distinct environment public keys), and opting out clears only the caller's endpoint key; the Api test shows unlink clearing only the unlinked link's endpoint key. Storage, caps and unlink deletion are therefore per link. Opting out clears every active link proven by the calling environment's key (infra/relay/src/environments/EnvironmentLinks.ts lines 374-404 and 432-445), which is still per link rather than every account's link of the environment id. The doc's per-environment description is wrong in three places: the storage unit (line 17), the deletion condition (lines 20-21), and the rationale (lines 28-30).

Evidence
  • Expected source: repository AGENTS.md, Documentation section (docs/internals/ records decisions and hard-to-discover constraints), together with the relay's own contract in the HookInbox.ts and deploymentConfig.ts comments cited above.
  • Failure source: docs/internals/t3-connect.md lines 13-30, compared with infra/relay/src/worker.ts lines 246-253, HeldHooks.ts lines 95-138 and Api.ts lines 539-558.
  • Evidence provenance: observed
  • Local verification: reproduced
  • Reproduction completeness: complete

The mismatch between the doc and the code was established by reading both on the main build. Per-link clearing was observed by running the existing relay unit tests, which use a mocked inbox. That HookInboxObject instances are named by endpoint key comes from reading worker.ts. A deployed relay with two accounts linking one environment was not exercised. Some relay code comments use the same per-environment wording as the doc: HookInboxStore.ts lines 11-21 and HookInbox.ts line 25 ("the environment's inbox"). git blame shows lines 13-30 unchanged since #15487 added them, and HookInbox.ts in that same change already named inboxes by endpoint key, so the doc has never matched the code.

Restoration check

Failing: docs/internals/t3-connect.md says held requests are stored in a Durable Object per environment, deleted when no user has the environment linked, with per-environment order and caps. Passing: the doc identifies the managed link (endpoint key) as the unit of storage, ordering and caps, and states deletion conditions that match Api.ts unlink and HeldHooks.setHoldWhileOffline. The step 5 tests still pass, showing the doc was changed to match the relay rather than the reverse.

Triage assessment
  • Impact level: P3
  • Assessment status: supported
  • Impact basis: Only internal maintainer documentation is wrong; relay behavior is unaffected. A reader would misjudge which held requests survive another account's unlink and how caps are shared, but nothing in the product follows this text.
  • Workaround status: available
  • Workaround basis: The comments in HookInbox.ts lines 17-21, HookInboxObject.ts, deploymentConfig.ts, HeldHooks.ts and Api.ts, the getByName(endpointKey) calls in worker.ts, and the relay tests show the per-link behavior today; a reader should not rely on the per-environment wording in the HookInboxStore.ts comments.
Impact

Cosmetic issue

Version or commit

main @ 3143335fc3a568cbbb5174764961889272135cb9 (2026-10-07); doc and relay hook code identical in v0.0.46-nightly.20261007.2787

Environment
  • The latest stable release, v0.0.45, predates the hold-while-offline feature (#15487), so it does not contain this text.
  • Node 22.23.2, pnpm 11.10.0, relay tests run with npx vp test run in infra/relay.
Logs or stack traces
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
cd infra/relay
npx vp test run src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts src/http/Api.test.ts -t "own endpoints|unlinked endpoint|wakes the caller" --reporter=verbose
✓ src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts > HeldHooks > opting out clears only the caller's own endpoints
✓ src/hooks/HeldHooks.test.ts > HeldHooks > wakes the caller's ready endpoints and reports whether anything was waiting
✓ src/http/Api.test.ts > relay environment unlink > drops the unlinked endpoint's held webhooks, even if clearing fails
Test Files  2 passed (2)
     Tests  3 passed | 33 skipped (36)
Screenshots, recordings, or supporting files

No response

Workaround

The comments in HookInbox.ts lines 17-21, HookInboxObject.ts, deploymentConfig.ts, HeldHooks.ts and Api.ts, the getByName(endpointKey) calls in worker.ts, and the relay tests show the per-link behavior today; a reader should not rely on the per-environment wording in the HookInboxStore.ts comments.

主要言語
TypeScript
スター
24.8k
フォーク
6.4k
平均マージ
8時間 58分
マージ済み PR(30日)
278

環境構築

Codespaces で開く

このプロジェクトの開発コンテナを、あなたの GitHub アカウントでブラウザ上に起動します。

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

pingdotgg/t3code のほかの issue

pingdotgg/t3code の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

TypeScript の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。