ESP32: rtc_gpio_hold_en() called on non-RTC GPIO18 during LilyGO repeater shutdown
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- embedded-iot
Research direction
Read src/helpers/ESP32Board.cpp and variants/lilygo_tlora_v2_1/platformio.ini to trace ESP32Board::enterDeepSleep() and confirm the NSS pin definition. Check the ESP-IDF GPIO documentation for the hold API supported by the target ESP32 variant. Done means deep sleep no longer calls an RTC-only API for GPIO18; verify the behavior on the affected hardware if available.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
While helping another user troubleshoot a LilyGO LoRa32 V2.1-1.6 repeater (ESP32, 433 MHz variant), I came across an invalid RTC GPIO call in the deep-sleep code.
Observed behavior
A custom Repeater build based on commit a366955cb2f67b8e6842d4f00d2b6a554dddd88a booted successfully, then entered the power-off sequence and produced this log:
Repeater ID: <redacted>
Powering Off
E (5387) RTCIO: rtc_gpio_hold_en(153): RTCIO number error
The build used a different radio frequency and LoRa reset pin, but the NSS pin definition and deep-sleep implementation were unchanged from upstream.
Cause
The LilyGO profile defines:
-D P_LORA_NSS=18
On the original ESP32, ESP32Board::enterDeepSleep() calls:
rtc_gpio_hold_en((gpio_num_t)P_LORA_NSS);
GPIO18 is not RTC-capable on the original ESP32, so rtc_gpio_hold_en() returns ESP_ERR_INVALID_ARG.
The 153 in the error message is an ESP-IDF source line number, not a GPIO number.
The call is also present in the current upstream main branch.
Expected behavior
The deep-sleep code should not call an RTC-only API for a regular GPIO.
If keeping NSS high during deep sleep is required, the appropriate GPIO hold mechanism should be used for the target ESP32 variant.
Scope of testing
I traced the shutdown path in the source and checked it against the captured UART log.
The power-off event itself appears to originate from the GPIO0 long-press handler. Its electrical cause has not been established.
The invalid RTC GPIO call explains the subsequent RTCIO error, not the original power-off event.
I have not reproduced this on an unmodified stock firmware binary or verified a fix on the affected hardware.
References
- [LilyGO board configuration](https://github.com/meshcore-dev/MeshCore/blob/main/variants/lilygo_tlora_v2_1/platformio.ini)
- [ESP32Board.cpp](https://github.com/meshcore-dev/MeshCore/blob/main/src/helpers/ESP32Board.cpp)
- [ESP-IDF GPIO documentation](https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/v4.4.7/esp32/api-reference/peripherals/gpio.html)
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 3.9k
- Forks
- 1.5k
- Avg merge
- 1d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 24
Getting set up
This project ships no dev container, Dockerfile or contributing guide, so setting up is up to you: start from its README, and see our first-contribution guide for the general steps.
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from meshcore-dev/MeshCore
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 63/100
meshcore-dev/MeshCore#3622 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Feature Request] Set Australia (Mid) Preset to automatically enable 2 byte default path hash sizeOpen
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
meshcore-dev/MeshCore#3571 · 5 reactions ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
meshcore-dev/MeshCore#3567 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
RTC_RX8130CE writes and reads the one-hot WEEK register as a numberPossibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
meshcore-dev/MeshCore#3549 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Repeater: CLI reply to 'setperm <key> 0' is lost when the removed ACL entry sits before the requester (stale ClientInfo* after array shift)Possibly taken A pull request linked to this issue is open or already merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 77/100
meshcore-dev/MeshCore#3513 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in meshcore-dev/MeshCore
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
colbymchenry/codegraph#2770 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
area/ysql kind/enhancement priority/medium status/awaiting-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 73/100
yugabyte/yugabyte-db#35578 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 66/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Bug Status: Needs Triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
interpreter-core type-feature
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day