Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

[Bug]: Pi auto-continuation pauses silently on any non-injected prompt (including post-compaction context) — only /loopx resume re-arms it

オープン
#6,107 コメント 1 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
初心者へのやさしさ
35/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
javascript, typescript

調査の方向性

Start in loopx/pi_goal_mode/pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs at userPrompt (around line 1076), where any prompt that differs from lastInjectedPrompt sets autoResume to false and cancels the schedule without notifying. Compare it with interrupt() (around line 1097), which does notify, and with the before_agent_start hook in loopx/pi_goal_mode/index.ts (around line 619). Done means host-generated prompts such as compaction or queued work no longer silently disarm the loop, or the pause is at least surfaced. The issue offers several fix options, so confirm the approach with the maintainer before writing code.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

Pi auto-continuation pauses silently on any non-injected prompt — including Pi's own post-compaction context — and only /loopx resume re-arms it

Affected version: Pi surface installed from release 20261010T034436Z; the userPrompt/interrupt logic quoted below is identical in this repository at 0233a2f32 (loopx/pi_goal_mode/pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs, loopx/pi_goal_mode/index.ts).
Host surface: pi (Pi visible goal loop)
Impact: a long-running Pi goal loop is disarmed by any prompt that is not the loop's own injected task body — including Pi's post-compaction context message and other system/queued work. The disarm is silent (no notification, no pause reason surfaced), the host looks healthy (loopx status clean, LoopX keeps reporting should_run=true), and every subsequent step then needs a human message. Recovery requires the owner to know about /loopx resume.

Code involved

// loopx/pi_goal_mode/pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs:1076
async userPrompt(key, prompt) {
  ...
  if (!binding || binding.terminal) return
  if (String(prompt || "") !== binding.lastInjectedPrompt) {
    const expected = { generation: binding.generation || 0, goalId: binding.goalId }
    const committed = await services.store.write(key, { autoResume: false }, expected)
    if (!committed) return
    if (disposed || epoch !== instanceEpoch) return
    cancelScheduled(key)          // <- no notify() on this path
  }
},
// loopx/pi_goal_mode/index.ts:619
pi.on("before_agent_start", async (event, ctx) => {
  const { key } = bindContext(ctx)
  await loop.userPrompt(key, String(event.prompt || ""))
})

Compare with the abort path, which does tell the user what happened:

// pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs:1097 (interrupt)
services.notify(`LoopX goal ${committed.goalId} auto-continuation paused after abort; run /loopx resume to continue.`, "info")

The loop does correctly recognize its own turns (lastInjectedPrompt is set to the task body before the prompt is sent), so injected auto-continuation turns do not disarm it. The problem is everything else that reaches before_agent_start.

Observed behaviour

  • Session: one long-lived Pi session (cwd = the goal's project); the LoopX goal was armed and the loop ran for hours.
  • A Pi context compaction was recorded in that session's transcript at 2026-10-10T07:44:38Z.
  • Afterwards the durable bridge state was:
{ "autoResume": false, "terminal": false, "generation": 1,
  "sessionKey": "2026-10-10T05-49-04-788Z_01a1245b-9794-71a9-9f76-bc39a6a15eadcb34" }

i.e. a pause, not a lost binding — sessionKey(process.env.PI_SESSION_FILE) reproduces that key exactly, and store.read(key) resolves.

  • From that point on the loop produced no turns: every step required a human message. Nothing was shown in the UI.
  • The LoopX side was never the blocker: quota should-run kept returning decision: run / should_run: true, scheduler_hint.action: run_now, cadence_class: active_work, must_attempt: true.
  • Writing autoResume: true back into that same state file (what /loopx resume does) re-armed the loop.

Why this is a defect rather than intended behaviour

A pause on user input is a reasonable design (the owner takes the wheel; explicitly re-arm afterwards). But:

  1. Pi's own automated context work (compaction, recovery, queued work — see docs/extensions.md: "Automatic retries, recovery, compaction, or queued work can continue afterward") is indistinguishable from user input at this event, so the loop is disarmed by the host's own housekeeping.
  2. The pause is silent, unlike the abort path which notifies. The user sees a healthy session and a stalled goal.
  3. Nothing durable records why it paused, so neither the user nor a diagnostic tool can tell "paused by input" from "never armed".

Suggested fixes (any of these)

  1. Do not treat host-generated prompts as user input. before_agent_start exposes the prompt plus structured systemPromptOptions, and the transcript records a compaction entry; use whichever signal is reliable to recognize compaction/recovery/queued runs and skip the disarm for them.
  2. Notify on this path, mirroring interrupt(): e.g. "LoopX goal auto-continuation paused by input; run /loopx resume to continue."
  3. Persist a pause reason (e.g. pauseReason: "foreign_prompt" | "aborted") in the bridge state so /loopx status and the host loop can surface it.
  4. Optionally auto-re-arm when the interrupting prompt was not user-authored.

Reproduction recipe

  1. Arm a LoopX goal in a Pi session and confirm one auto-continuation round.
  2. Trigger Pi context compaction (or send any manual message).
  3. Observe .loopx/pi/<sessionKey>.json flip to autoResume: false with no UI notification, and no further automatic turns, while LoopX continues to report run_now / must_attempt: true.
主要言語
Python
スター
6.2k
フォーク
596
平均マージ
7時間 35分
マージ済み PR(30日)
928

環境構築

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

loopx-project/loopx のほかの issue

loopx-project/loopx の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Python の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。