[Bug]: Pi auto-continuation pauses silently on any non-injected prompt (including post-compaction context) — only /loopx resume re-arms it
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- javascript, typescript
- Ambito
- ai-infra-agents
Direzione di ricerca
Start in loopx/pi_goal_mode/pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs at userPrompt (around line 1076), where any prompt that differs from lastInjectedPrompt sets autoResume to false and cancels the schedule without notifying. Compare it with interrupt() (around line 1097), which does notify, and with the before_agent_start hook in loopx/pi_goal_mode/index.ts (around line 619). Done means host-generated prompts such as compaction or queued work no longer silently disarm the loop, or the pause is at least surfaced. The issue offers several fix options, so confirm the approach with the maintainer before writing code.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Pi auto-continuation pauses silently on any non-injected prompt — including Pi's own post-compaction context — and only /loopx resume re-arms it
Affected version: Pi surface installed from release 20261010T034436Z; the userPrompt/interrupt logic quoted below is identical in this repository at 0233a2f32 (loopx/pi_goal_mode/pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs, loopx/pi_goal_mode/index.ts).
Host surface: pi (Pi visible goal loop)
Impact: a long-running Pi goal loop is disarmed by any prompt that is not the loop's own injected task body — including Pi's post-compaction context message and other system/queued work. The disarm is silent (no notification, no pause reason surfaced), the host looks healthy (loopx status clean, LoopX keeps reporting should_run=true), and every subsequent step then needs a human message. Recovery requires the owner to know about /loopx resume.
Code involved
// loopx/pi_goal_mode/pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs:1076
async userPrompt(key, prompt) {
...
if (!binding || binding.terminal) return
if (String(prompt || "") !== binding.lastInjectedPrompt) {
const expected = { generation: binding.generation || 0, goalId: binding.goalId }
const committed = await services.store.write(key, { autoResume: false }, expected)
if (!committed) return
if (disposed || epoch !== instanceEpoch) return
cancelScheduled(key) // <- no notify() on this path
}
},
// loopx/pi_goal_mode/index.ts:619
pi.on("before_agent_start", async (event, ctx) => {
const { key } = bindContext(ctx)
await loop.userPrompt(key, String(event.prompt || ""))
})
Compare with the abort path, which does tell the user what happened:
// pi-goal-loop-runtime.mjs:1097 (interrupt)
services.notify(`LoopX goal ${committed.goalId} auto-continuation paused after abort; run /loopx resume to continue.`, "info")
The loop does correctly recognize its own turns (lastInjectedPrompt is set to the task body before the prompt is sent), so injected auto-continuation turns do not disarm it. The problem is everything else that reaches before_agent_start.
Observed behaviour
- Session: one long-lived Pi session (
cwd= the goal's project); the LoopX goal was armed and the loop ran for hours. - A Pi context compaction was recorded in that session's transcript at
2026-10-10T07:44:38Z. - Afterwards the durable bridge state was:
{ "autoResume": false, "terminal": false, "generation": 1,
"sessionKey": "2026-10-10T05-49-04-788Z_01a1245b-9794-71a9-9f76-bc39a6a15eadcb34" }
i.e. a pause, not a lost binding — sessionKey(process.env.PI_SESSION_FILE) reproduces that key exactly, and store.read(key) resolves.
- From that point on the loop produced no turns: every step required a human message. Nothing was shown in the UI.
- The LoopX side was never the blocker:
quota should-runkept returningdecision: run/should_run: true,scheduler_hint.action: run_now,cadence_class: active_work,must_attempt: true. - Writing
autoResume: trueback into that same state file (what/loopx resumedoes) re-armed the loop.
Why this is a defect rather than intended behaviour
A pause on user input is a reasonable design (the owner takes the wheel; explicitly re-arm afterwards). But:
- Pi's own automated context work (compaction, recovery, queued work — see
docs/extensions.md: "Automatic retries, recovery, compaction, or queued work can continue afterward") is indistinguishable from user input at this event, so the loop is disarmed by the host's own housekeeping. - The pause is silent, unlike the abort path which notifies. The user sees a healthy session and a stalled goal.
- Nothing durable records why it paused, so neither the user nor a diagnostic tool can tell "paused by input" from "never armed".
Suggested fixes (any of these)
- Do not treat host-generated prompts as user input.
before_agent_startexposes the prompt plus structuredsystemPromptOptions, and the transcript records acompactionentry; use whichever signal is reliable to recognize compaction/recovery/queued runs and skip the disarm for them. - Notify on this path, mirroring
interrupt(): e.g. "LoopX goal auto-continuation paused by input; run /loopx resume to continue." - Persist a pause reason (e.g.
pauseReason: "foreign_prompt" | "aborted") in the bridge state so/loopx statusand the host loop can surface it. - Optionally auto-re-arm when the interrupting prompt was not user-authored.
Reproduction recipe
- Arm a LoopX goal in a Pi session and confirm one auto-continuation round.
- Trigger Pi context compaction (or send any manual message).
- Observe
.loopx/pi/<sessionKey>.jsonflip toautoResume: falsewith no UI notification, and no further automatic turns, while LoopX continues to reportrun_now/must_attempt: true.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 6.2k
- Fork
- 596
- Merge medio
- 5h 34m
- PR unite (30g)
- 931
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di loopx-project/loopx
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
loopx-project/loopx#6842 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
loopx-project/loopx#6108 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5688 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 60/100
loopx-project/loopx#5632 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5443 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di loopx-project/loopx
Issue simili
-
Link Checker ReportApertaautomated issue linkchecker report
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
QuantEcon/lecture-python.myst#1098 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
podly-pure-podcasts/podly_pure_podcasts#279 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
New template proposal: ljpApertatemplate-proposal
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 82/100
OpenShot/openshot-qt#6230 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno