[Extension]: Update AEE catalog entry to v1.0.1
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
調査の方向性
既存の AEE v1.0.0 カタログエントリを見つけ、この Issue で提案されている v1.0.1 JSON と比較します。バージョン、説明、ツールの依存関係、URL、コマンドまたはフックの数を更新し、その後カタログの自動検証を実行します。エントリが検証に合格し、リリース済みの v1.0.1 メタデータと一致すれば完了です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Extension ID
aee
Extension Name
Applied Epistemic Engineering
Version
1.0.1
Description
Challenge claims, trace evidence, propagate uncertainty, and route epistemic failures across phases
Author
ElectroHire
Repository URL
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee
Download URL
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.1.zip
License
MIT
Homepage (optional)
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee
Documentation URL (optional)
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee#readme
Changelog URL (optional)
https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
Required Spec Kit Version
=1.0.0
Required Tools (optional)
- python (>=3.11) — required
- aee CLI — the Applied Epistemic Engineering engine (>=1.0.2,<2); 1.0.2 introduced the
gapscommand — required - spec-kit-evaluator (>=1.0.0,<2) — Spec Kit extension implementing the Evaluator Contract; install it first — required
Number of Commands
6 (speckit.aee.assess, speckit.aee.challenge, speckit.aee.trace, speckit.aee.verify, speckit.aee.gate, speckit.aee.gaps)
Number of Hooks (optional)
5 (after_specify, after_plan, after_tasks, after_implement, after_verify)
Tags
epistemics, evidence, provenance, uncertainty, governance
Key Features
- Challenge claims on atomicity, boundaries, falsifiability, dependencies, and evidence independence
- Assess explicit claims and emit a rich AEE assessment plus an Evaluator Contract result
- Render the claim dependency graph and inspect epistemic provenance
- Verify the tamper-evident AEE ledger without claiming its contents are true
- Apply a CI-friendly decision gate to an AEE assessment
- Generate and update the gap register from a verification matrix and test evidence
Testing Checklist
- Extension installs successfully via download URL
- All commands execute without errors
- Documentation is complete and accurate
- No security vulnerabilities identified
- Tested on at least one real project
Submission Requirements
- Valid
extension.ymlmanifest included - README.md with installation and usage instructions
- LICENSE file included
- GitHub release created with version tag
- All command files exist and are properly formatted
- Extension ID follows naming conventions (lowercase-with-hyphens)
Testing Details
Tested on (CI): Ubuntu 24.04 with Python 3.11 and 3.13; Windows with Python 3.12 — all installing the real AEE engine 1.0.2 from hash-locked requirements (pip install --require-hashes).
Manifest validation: the release extension.yml is parsed with Spec Kit's own manifest parser in CI (validate job), and deterministic extension.yml/documentation compliance tests run on every push.
What changed in v1.0.1 vs v1.0.0: dependency metadata now uses Spec Kit's documented tool metadata (Python, AEE engine 1.0.2, Evaluator Contract); the unsupported requires.commands field was replaced with explicit installation guidance; the description was trimmed to 99 characters per the publishing guide; the exact AEE claim field vocabulary is documented in speckit.aee.assess.
Example Usage
# Install extension
specify extension add aee --from https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.1.zip
# Assess the claims in your current spec
/speckit.aee.assess
Proposed Catalog Entry
{
"aee": {
"name": "Applied Epistemic Engineering",
"id": "aee",
"description": "Challenge claims, trace evidence, propagate uncertainty, and route epistemic failures across phases",
"author": "ElectroHire",
"version": "1.0.1",
"download_url": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.1.zip",
"repository": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee",
"homepage": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee",
"documentation": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee#readme",
"changelog": "https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md",
"license": "MIT",
"requires": {
"speckit_version": ">=1.0.0",
"tools": [
{ "name": "python", "version": ">=3.11", "required": true },
{ "name": "aee", "version": ">=1.0.2,<2", "required": true },
{ "name": "spec-kit-evaluator", "version": ">=1.0.0,<2", "required": true }
]
},
"provides": {
"commands": 6,
"hooks": 5
},
"tags": ["epistemics", "evidence", "provenance", "uncertainty", "governance"],
"verified": false,
"downloads": 0,
"stars": 0
}
}
Additional Context
Note for maintainers: this updates the existing catalog entry for the AEE extension (v1.0.0 → v1.0.1, new description). It is separate from #4626, which requested dependency-metadata corrections for the existing v1.0.0 entry. Please do not close this as a duplicate of #4626.
- This issue supersedes #4661, which failed automated validation only because the validator's execution environment blocked the archive download (all other checks — extension ID, semver, repository files, URL ownership/pinning, matching release, all submission checkboxes — passed); #4661 is being closed.
- Existing catalog entry (v1.0.0) should be updated to this v1.0.1 entry: new version, new 99-character description, declared tool dependencies.
- Release: https://github.com/electrohire/spec-kit-aee/releases/tag/v1.0.1
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 138k
- フォーク
- 12.4k
- 平均マージ
- 3日 4時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 154
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
github/spec-kit のほかの issue
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 74/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
-
enhancement needs-triage triage-can-wait
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
github/spec-kit の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
essnmx good first issue
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success オープンarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·