[Feature]: Add deterministic contribution IDs and stack lookup IDs for resolved artifacts
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 38/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- cli, documentation, testing, tooling
調査の方向性
まず拡張機能マニフェストのスキーマとバリデーションから始め、次に provenance に基づくレイヤーに対する PresetResolver の合成処理を追跡します。extensions/EXTENSION-API-REFERENCE.md と preset API/manifest のリファレンスを読み、既存のスキーマテストとリゾルバーテストを実行してください。完了の条件は、一覧にあるすべてのアーティファクト種別、フック、組み込み要素、オーバーライド、互換性ケースについて、決定論的な ID と lookupId の関係が網羅されていることです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Problem Statement
Spec Kit identifies contributed commands, templates, scripts, and hooks primarily by name. Names can collide across artifact kinds and source layers, and a name alone cannot reliably link a resolved artifact-stack layer to the exact manifest contribution that supplied it. Consumers such as preset info --json, extension info --json, and specify artifact need stable contribution identifiers and a join key that works across reinstalls and machines.
Proposed Solution
Introduce computed, opaque id fields for every command, template, script, and hook returned by public preset/extension manifest and info APIs, plus a lookupId field on every provenance-backed non-built-in resolved artifact-stack layer.
For named preset, extension, and project-override contributions, derive IDs using:
{layer}:{sourceId}:{kind}:{name}
Use project, preset, or extension for layer; _ only for the project-override source ID; and the preset or extension manifest ID for manifest-declared sources. Use command, template, or script for kind. Examples include preset:speckit.core:command:speckit.plan, extension:speckit.git:template:pr-body, and project:_:template:spec-template.
For hooks, use {eventName}:{command} as the name component. Hooks are valid only for preset and extension layers. If duplicate event/command hook entries are valid, add an appropriate stable discriminator or reject duplicates; do not use array position.
Built-in artifacts do not have an originating manifest contribution and therefore do not receive a contribution lookupId. Every artifact, including built-ins, instead has a source-agnostic public ID of the form {kind}:{name}. Built-in stack rows are recognized by absent provenance fields (layer, sourceId, and lookupId are null), and round-trip through the public artifact ID.
Compute IDs at read, serialization, or resolution time rather than persisting them in authored or installed manifests. For manifest-declared preset and extension layers, lookupId must exactly match the originating contribution's id. Preserve existing name-based behavior and document IDs as opaque strings.
Alternatives Considered
Install-time UUIDs are unsuitable because they differ across machines and reinstalls. Existing names are insufficient because they collide across sources and kinds. Content hashes are unsuitable because IDs would change whenever artifact content is edited. Array indexes are unsuitable for hooks because reordering entries would change their IDs.
A synthetic core:_:... contribution ID was considered for built-in assets. It was rejected because built-ins have no originating preset or extension manifest contribution to join to; the source-agnostic {kind}:{name} artifact ID provides their stable round-trip key without overloading lookupId.
Do not use the existing integration manifest as the ID source; it tracks installed file hashes and paths rather than manifest contribution identity.
Component
Specify CLI (initialization, commands)
AI Agent (if applicable)
No response
Use Cases
- A wizard can read an artifact stack and follow each provenance-backed layer's
lookupIdto the full contribution detail without re-parsing manifests. - Developers on different machines can use identical IDs when reporting or diagnosing a contribution.
- Tooling can hash or cache resolved compositions using public artifact IDs plus the available layer
lookupIdvalues. - Future JSON output for
preset info,extension info, andspecify artifactcan expose consistent cross-references.
Acceptance Criteria
- Document the
layer:sourceId:kind:namecontribution grammar, the source-agnostickind:nameartifact ID, and thelookupIdrelationship inextensions/EXTENSION-API-REFERENCE.mdand the preset API/manifest reference. - Public preset/extension manifest and info representations expose computed
idvalues for commands, templates, scripts, and hooks. - Hook IDs are deterministic and collision-free without install paths or list indexes.
- Manifest-declared preset and extension artifact-stack layers expose
lookupIdequal to the corresponding contribution'sid. - Project-local override layers use the synthetic
project:_:{kind}:{name}lookup form and intentionally have no manifest contribution match. - Built-in artifact-stack layers expose no contribution provenance (
layer,sourceId, andlookupIdare null) and round-trip through the public{kind}:{name}artifact ID. - Identical manifest coordinates produce identical IDs across processes, machines, project locations, and reinstalls.
- Manifest-backed IDs do not depend on artifact contents, timestamps, manifest hashes, archive paths, or installation directories.
- Existing
namefields and name-based resolution remain unchanged. - Tests cover each provenance-backed layer and artifact kind, hook uniqueness, resolver repeatability, manifest lookup round-trips, built-in public-ID round-trips, and backward compatibility.
Additional Context
This request defines the ID contract only. Adding the JSON output surfaces themselves for preset info --json, extension info --json, or specify artifact is out of scope and will be handled separately. Changing precedence, resolution, installation, or uninstall behavior is also out of scope. Relevant implementation areas include the extension manifest schema and validation and PresetResolver composition handling. IDs must not expose install paths, secrets, or connection strings.
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 138k
- フォーク
- 12.4k
- 平均マージ
- 3日 4時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 154
コントリビューションガイド
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
github/spec-kit のほかの issue
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 74/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
-
enhancement needs-triage triage-can-wait
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
github/spec-kit の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
essnmx good first issue
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success オープンarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 70/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·