[Feature]: Add deterministic contribution IDs and stack lookup IDs for resolved artifacts
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 38/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- python
- Ambito
- cli, documentation, testing, tooling
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia dallo schema e dalla validazione del manifest dell’estensione, quindi segui la gestione della composizione in PresetResolver per i layer supportati dalla provenance. Leggi extensions/EXTENSION-API-REFERENCE.md e il riferimento all’API/manifest dei preset, ed esegui i test esistenti dello schema e del resolver. Il lavoro è completato quando gli ID deterministici e le relazioni lookupId sono coperti per tutti i tipi di artefatti elencati, gli hook, i built-in, gli override e i casi di compatibilità.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Problem Statement
Spec Kit identifies contributed commands, templates, scripts, and hooks primarily by name. Names can collide across artifact kinds and source layers, and a name alone cannot reliably link a resolved artifact-stack layer to the exact manifest contribution that supplied it. Consumers such as preset info --json, extension info --json, and specify artifact need stable contribution identifiers and a join key that works across reinstalls and machines.
Proposed Solution
Introduce computed, opaque id fields for every command, template, script, and hook returned by public preset/extension manifest and info APIs, plus a lookupId field on every provenance-backed non-built-in resolved artifact-stack layer.
For named preset, extension, and project-override contributions, derive IDs using:
{layer}:{sourceId}:{kind}:{name}
Use project, preset, or extension for layer; _ only for the project-override source ID; and the preset or extension manifest ID for manifest-declared sources. Use command, template, or script for kind. Examples include preset:speckit.core:command:speckit.plan, extension:speckit.git:template:pr-body, and project:_:template:spec-template.
For hooks, use {eventName}:{command} as the name component. Hooks are valid only for preset and extension layers. If duplicate event/command hook entries are valid, add an appropriate stable discriminator or reject duplicates; do not use array position.
Built-in artifacts do not have an originating manifest contribution and therefore do not receive a contribution lookupId. Every artifact, including built-ins, instead has a source-agnostic public ID of the form {kind}:{name}. Built-in stack rows are recognized by absent provenance fields (layer, sourceId, and lookupId are null), and round-trip through the public artifact ID.
Compute IDs at read, serialization, or resolution time rather than persisting them in authored or installed manifests. For manifest-declared preset and extension layers, lookupId must exactly match the originating contribution's id. Preserve existing name-based behavior and document IDs as opaque strings.
Alternatives Considered
Install-time UUIDs are unsuitable because they differ across machines and reinstalls. Existing names are insufficient because they collide across sources and kinds. Content hashes are unsuitable because IDs would change whenever artifact content is edited. Array indexes are unsuitable for hooks because reordering entries would change their IDs.
A synthetic core:_:... contribution ID was considered for built-in assets. It was rejected because built-ins have no originating preset or extension manifest contribution to join to; the source-agnostic {kind}:{name} artifact ID provides their stable round-trip key without overloading lookupId.
Do not use the existing integration manifest as the ID source; it tracks installed file hashes and paths rather than manifest contribution identity.
Component
Specify CLI (initialization, commands)
AI Agent (if applicable)
No response
Use Cases
- A wizard can read an artifact stack and follow each provenance-backed layer's
lookupIdto the full contribution detail without re-parsing manifests. - Developers on different machines can use identical IDs when reporting or diagnosing a contribution.
- Tooling can hash or cache resolved compositions using public artifact IDs plus the available layer
lookupIdvalues. - Future JSON output for
preset info,extension info, andspecify artifactcan expose consistent cross-references.
Acceptance Criteria
- Document the
layer:sourceId:kind:namecontribution grammar, the source-agnostickind:nameartifact ID, and thelookupIdrelationship inextensions/EXTENSION-API-REFERENCE.mdand the preset API/manifest reference. - Public preset/extension manifest and info representations expose computed
idvalues for commands, templates, scripts, and hooks. - Hook IDs are deterministic and collision-free without install paths or list indexes.
- Manifest-declared preset and extension artifact-stack layers expose
lookupIdequal to the corresponding contribution'sid. - Project-local override layers use the synthetic
project:_:{kind}:{name}lookup form and intentionally have no manifest contribution match. - Built-in artifact-stack layers expose no contribution provenance (
layer,sourceId, andlookupIdare null) and round-trip through the public{kind}:{name}artifact ID. - Identical manifest coordinates produce identical IDs across processes, machines, project locations, and reinstalls.
- Manifest-backed IDs do not depend on artifact contents, timestamps, manifest hashes, archive paths, or installation directories.
- Existing
namefields and name-based resolution remain unchanged. - Tests cover each provenance-backed layer and artifact kind, hook uniqueness, resolver repeatability, manifest lookup round-trips, built-in public-ID round-trips, and backward compatibility.
Additional Context
This request defines the ID contract only. Adding the JSON output surfaces themselves for preset info --json, extension info --json, or specify artifact is out of scope and will be handled separately. Changing precedence, resolution, installation, or uninstall behavior is also out of scope. Relevant implementation areas include the extension manifest schema and validation and PresetResolver composition handling. IDs must not expose install paths, secrets, or connection strings.
- Lingua principale
- Python
- Stelle
- 138k
- Fork
- 12.4k
- Merge medio
- 3g 4h
- PR unite (30g)
- 154
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di github/spec-kit
-
enhancement needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
-
enhancement needs-triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
-
enhancement needs-triage triage-can-wait
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
Tutte le issue di github/spec-kit
Issue simili
-
essnmx good first issue
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 95/100
-
[Feature] 奇物选择添加优先级 Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 65/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#174 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
Giskard-AI/giskard-oss#2840 · 1 commento ·
-
A claim comment carrying the issue number is silently declined while the workflow reports success Apertaarea: repo bug perceived difficulty: 2
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
yeti-platform/yeti#1380 ·