Seeking feedback before overhauling items

まず items.csv と、リンクされている SV アイテム一覧および不一致一覧を確認し、その後、影響を受けるテーブルと既存の 10000+ ID を調査してから、提案された canonical remapping が受け入れ可能かどうかを判断します。完了条件は、欠落したアイテム、名前が変更されたアイテム、空白/??? のアイテムの扱いについてプロジェクト内で合意し、remapping の具体的な範囲を定めることです。実装方法はまだ指定されていません。

I'd really like to add the approximately 350 items we're currently missing (the ones from Legends: Arceus and Scarlet/Violet), but I can't shake the notion that now'd be a good time to take the opportunity to fix all the "misalignment" currently present in items.csv. It's clear that the file has grown organically over the years, with contributors haphazardly discovering missing items and appending them with the next available ID. This system does work, but I think it'd be nice (both aesthetically and in terms of data "purity") if our indexing matched something canonical.

Unsurprisingly, the vast majority of our items are present in SV's list, but there are some discrepancies, namely 40 that are absent and 18 that would need minor renaming (not counting two-digit TMs). There are plenty of gaps in the list, and it's occasionally "obvious" where we could slot in some of our absentees, but that would seem to defeat the purpose. I think it'd be fine to special-case them with 10000+ IDs, the way we do currently for Black Augurite and Peat Block (which I must say is hard to make sense of).

I appreciate that this would involve a great deal of modification to lots of tables, but I'd be happy to script the remapping and presumably make this a non-issue for the foreseeable future (there were only a handful of item index changes between Generations VII and VIII, and none between VIII and IX). It's a fairly invasive change (plus it's not perfectly clear what we should do about the many blank/??? items), so it seemed like a good idea to gauge consensus before proceeding.