Deployment stacks don't carry the Resource Management Private Link origin: App Configuration keyValues writes to a private store fail with Forbidden (plain deployments succeed)
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 明瞭さ
- 明確に書かれている
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- azure
- 領域
- cloud
調査の方向性
Start by tracing the resource write path for az stack group create and az stack sub create, then compare how it propagates request origin with plain deployment writes. The issue provides Bicep templates and correlation IDs for both failing stack shapes, but no repository files or tests to start from. Done means stack writes preserve the Resource Management Private Link origin so App Configuration key-value writes succeed against a private store.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Describe the bug
App Configuration's ARM dataPlaneProxy.privateLinkDelegation: 'Enabled' lets an ARM deployment write Microsoft.AppConfiguration/configurationStores/keyValues into a store with publicNetworkAccess: 'Disabled', as long as the deployment request reached ARM over a Resource Management Private Link (RMPL).
This works for a plain deployment (az deployment group/sub create). It does not work for a deployment stack (az stack group/sub create) sent from the same client over the same private link. Every key-value write in the stack fails with Forbidden. It looks like the stack's resource writes reach the App Configuration RP as public ARM traffic and do not carry the private-link origin of the request that created the stack.
To Reproduce
Setup:
- A Resource Management Private Link, its Private Link Association at the tenant root management group, and a private endpoint (
groupId: ResourceManagement) withprivatelink.azure.comresolvingmanagement.azure.comto the endpoint's private IP. - A client inside that VNet. We used a VNet-injected GitHub-hosted runner, and the ARM activity log shows the caller IP is the private address.
- An App Configuration store (Standard) with
publicNetworkAccess: 'Disabled',disableLocalAuth: true, anddataPlaneProxy: { authenticationMode: 'Pass-through', privateLinkDelegation: 'Enabled' }. The deploying principal holdsApp Configuration Data Owneron it.
Template (kv.bicep):
param storeName string
param key string
resource store 'Microsoft.AppConfiguration/configurationStores@2025-06-01-preview' existing = {
name: storeName
}
resource kv 'Microsoft.AppConfiguration/configurationStores/keyValues@2025-06-01-preview' = {
parent: store
name: key
properties: { value: 'rmpl-probe' }
}
sub.bicep is a subscription-scope wrapper that calls kv.bicep as a module scoped to the store's resource group. nested.bicep is a resource-group template that calls kv.bicep as a module.
We sent five shapes from the same runner, in the same job, against the same store:
| # | Shape | Command | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RG deployment | az deployment group create -f kv.bicep |
✅ written |
| 2 | RG deployment, nested module | az deployment group create -f nested.bicep |
✅ written |
| 3 | Sub deployment → RG module | az deployment sub create -f sub.bicep |
✅ written |
| 4 | RG stack | az stack group create -f kv.bicep --action-on-unmanage detachAll --deny-settings-mode none |
❌ Forbidden |
| 5 | Sub stack → RG module | az stack sub create -f sub.bicep --action-on-unmanage detachAll --deny-settings-mode none |
❌ Forbidden |
Error on the key-value resource in 4 and 5:
"code": "Forbidden",
"message": "Access to the requested resource is forbidden. See https://aka.ms/appconfig/DeploymentTroubleshooting for information on permissions and authentication settings in deployment scenarios."
The template, principal, store and network path are the same for all five. The only difference is deployment vs. deployment stack.
In an earlier run of the real workload, the activity log recorded the stack's own PUT from the runner's private address (10.x), while the store refused the key-value writes from a public Azure address. So the private origin is lost between the stack and the resource writes it fans out.
Expected behavior
A deployment stack created over a Resource Management Private Link writes App Configuration key-values into a private store, just as a plain deployment does from the same client.
Server Debugging Information
| Shape | Correlation ID | Timestamp (UTC) |
|---|---|---|
| 4: RG stack | da31696b-85e9-4078-9600-4f72e5ac0610 |
2026-11-04 15:32:18 |
| 5: Sub stack | 00946672-971b-43f1-979c-96f1b139f54b (operation bec23e19-648e-40c7-948a-af4320a22b34) |
2026-11-04 15:34:38 |
Data center: Germany West Central. Tenant and subscription IDs are available privately on request.
Additional context
- Because of this, any workload that deploys App Configuration key-values through stacks has to switch the store's
publicNetworkAccesstoEnabledfor the length of the deploy, which is the exposureprivateLinkDelegationwas meant to remove. - Related: Azure/AppConfiguration#698 (the ARM private access feature), Azure/AppConfiguration#804.
- We found no other workaround:
@onlyIfNotExists,existingResource()and@retryOn(Bicep v0.48.1) don't change the origin of the request.
- 主要言語
- Bicep
- スター
- 103
- フォーク
- 13
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
環境構築
このプロジェクトには開発コンテナ、Dockerfile、コントリビューションガイドがありません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
Azure/deployment-stacks のほかの issue
-
Let customers ignore specific properties in stack what-if (similar to Terraform's ignore_changes)オープン
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 25/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#268 ·
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 48/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#267 ·
-
Stack what-if reports read-only alias fields on Microsoft.Network/dnsZones/A as Modify after the baseline対応中かも @dantedallag が 6 日前に担当しました。 オープン
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 45/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#265 · コメント 1 件 · 担当者 1 名 ·
-
deleteAll picks an unsupported deletion api-version per resource type (recurrence of #182/#198) - now Microsoft.Cdn ruleSets/rules rejects 2026-10-01対応中かも @snarkywolverine が 9 日前に担当しました。 オープンdelete
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 38/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#264 · コメント 8 件 · 担当者 1 名 ·
-
noise-reduction what-if
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 22/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#263 · コメント 3 件 ·
Azure/deployment-stacks の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
aws/aws-emulator#345 ·
-
documentation
難易度 1/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
-
bug dependencies python
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 86/100
awslabs/social-messaging-agent-runtime-toolkit#188 ·
メンテナーはふだん 3 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-python#8801 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信