Deployment stacks don't carry the Resource Management Private Link origin: App Configuration keyValues writes to a private store fail with Forbidden (plain deployments succeed)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- azure
- Área
- cloud
Línea de trabajo
Start by tracing the resource write path for az stack group create and az stack sub create, then compare how it propagates request origin with plain deployment writes. The issue provides Bicep templates and correlation IDs for both failing stack shapes, but no repository files or tests to start from. Done means stack writes preserve the Resource Management Private Link origin so App Configuration key-value writes succeed against a private store.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Describe the bug
App Configuration's ARM dataPlaneProxy.privateLinkDelegation: 'Enabled' lets an ARM deployment write Microsoft.AppConfiguration/configurationStores/keyValues into a store with publicNetworkAccess: 'Disabled', as long as the deployment request reached ARM over a Resource Management Private Link (RMPL).
This works for a plain deployment (az deployment group/sub create). It does not work for a deployment stack (az stack group/sub create) sent from the same client over the same private link. Every key-value write in the stack fails with Forbidden. It looks like the stack's resource writes reach the App Configuration RP as public ARM traffic and do not carry the private-link origin of the request that created the stack.
To Reproduce
Setup:
- A Resource Management Private Link, its Private Link Association at the tenant root management group, and a private endpoint (
groupId: ResourceManagement) withprivatelink.azure.comresolvingmanagement.azure.comto the endpoint's private IP. - A client inside that VNet. We used a VNet-injected GitHub-hosted runner, and the ARM activity log shows the caller IP is the private address.
- An App Configuration store (Standard) with
publicNetworkAccess: 'Disabled',disableLocalAuth: true, anddataPlaneProxy: { authenticationMode: 'Pass-through', privateLinkDelegation: 'Enabled' }. The deploying principal holdsApp Configuration Data Owneron it.
Template (kv.bicep):
param storeName string
param key string
resource store 'Microsoft.AppConfiguration/configurationStores@2025-06-01-preview' existing = {
name: storeName
}
resource kv 'Microsoft.AppConfiguration/configurationStores/keyValues@2025-06-01-preview' = {
parent: store
name: key
properties: { value: 'rmpl-probe' }
}
sub.bicep is a subscription-scope wrapper that calls kv.bicep as a module scoped to the store's resource group. nested.bicep is a resource-group template that calls kv.bicep as a module.
We sent five shapes from the same runner, in the same job, against the same store:
| # | Shape | Command | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RG deployment | az deployment group create -f kv.bicep |
✅ written |
| 2 | RG deployment, nested module | az deployment group create -f nested.bicep |
✅ written |
| 3 | Sub deployment → RG module | az deployment sub create -f sub.bicep |
✅ written |
| 4 | RG stack | az stack group create -f kv.bicep --action-on-unmanage detachAll --deny-settings-mode none |
❌ Forbidden |
| 5 | Sub stack → RG module | az stack sub create -f sub.bicep --action-on-unmanage detachAll --deny-settings-mode none |
❌ Forbidden |
Error on the key-value resource in 4 and 5:
"code": "Forbidden",
"message": "Access to the requested resource is forbidden. See https://aka.ms/appconfig/DeploymentTroubleshooting for information on permissions and authentication settings in deployment scenarios."
The template, principal, store and network path are the same for all five. The only difference is deployment vs. deployment stack.
In an earlier run of the real workload, the activity log recorded the stack's own PUT from the runner's private address (10.x), while the store refused the key-value writes from a public Azure address. So the private origin is lost between the stack and the resource writes it fans out.
Expected behavior
A deployment stack created over a Resource Management Private Link writes App Configuration key-values into a private store, just as a plain deployment does from the same client.
Server Debugging Information
| Shape | Correlation ID | Timestamp (UTC) |
|---|---|---|
| 4: RG stack | da31696b-85e9-4078-9600-4f72e5ac0610 |
2026-11-04 15:32:18 |
| 5: Sub stack | 00946672-971b-43f1-979c-96f1b139f54b (operation bec23e19-648e-40c7-948a-af4320a22b34) |
2026-11-04 15:34:38 |
Data center: Germany West Central. Tenant and subscription IDs are available privately on request.
Additional context
- Because of this, any workload that deploys App Configuration key-values through stacks has to switch the store's
publicNetworkAccesstoEnabledfor the length of the deploy, which is the exposureprivateLinkDelegationwas meant to remove. - Related: Azure/AppConfiguration#698 (the ARM private access feature), Azure/AppConfiguration#804.
- We found no other workaround:
@onlyIfNotExists,existingResource()and@retryOn(Bicep v0.48.1) don't change the origin of the request.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Bicep
- Estrellas
- 103
- Forks
- 13
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Azure/deployment-stacks
-
Let customers ignore specific properties in stack what-if (similar to Terraform's ignore_changes)Abierto
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#268 ·
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#267 ·
-
Stack what-if reports read-only alias fields on Microsoft.Network/dnsZones/A as Modify after the baselinePosiblemente ocupada @dantedallag la tomó hace 6 días. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 45/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#265 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
-
deleteAll picks an unsupported deletion api-version per resource type (recurrence of #182/#198) - now Microsoft.Cdn ruleSets/rules rejects 2026-10-01Posiblemente ocupada @snarkywolverine la tomó hace 9 días. Abiertodelete
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#264 · 8 comentarios · 1 asignado ·
-
noise-reduction what-if
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 22/100
Azure/deployment-stacks#263 · 3 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de Azure/deployment-stacks
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
aws/aws-emulator#345 ·
-
documentation
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
-
bug dependencies python
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
awslabs/social-messaging-agent-runtime-toolkit#188 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-python#8801 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día