Drop the "group by post type" in search results
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
調査の方向性
Start with acf_get_grouped_posts() in includes/api/api-helpers.php, where the search query's orderby and the _acf_orderby_post_type filter are applied, then with the search branch of the relationship field's AJAX query in includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php. Reproduce by searching a relationship field across several post types and checking that results are grouped. Done when a search returns title matches first in a flat list, and the existing grouped behaviour still works for browsing.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
The grouping by post type makes it near impossible to find content in very large sites through the search feature in fields like the relationship field.
Instead of surfacing a title match, the results will always first show much weaker matcher in post types that happen to appear earlier.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Have a large site with many post types
- Have a relationship field that allows content from multiple post types
- Try searching for an exact title match for something that has a post type that isn't one of the earliest when sorting types.
- You will see much weaker matches, i.e. individual terms matched in body content.
- You need to scroll through all the weaker matches before finding your exact title match
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
I expect search to surface title matches first.
Version Information:
- WordPress Version 6.9
- PHP Version 8.4
- ACF Version latest
Suggested fix
diff --git a/includes/api/api-helpers.php b/includes/api/api-helpers.php
index c45f733b75..8a84c66f0e 100644
--- a/includes/api/api-helpers.php
+++ b/includes/api/api-helpers.php
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
'posts_per_page' => -1,
'paged' => 0,
'post_type' => 'post',
- 'orderby' => 'menu_order title',
+ 'orderby' => empty( $args['s'] ) ? 'menu_order title' : 'relevance',
'order' => 'ASC',
'post_status' => 'any',
'suppress_filters' => false,
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
}
// add filter to orderby post type
- if ( ! $is_single_post_type ) {
+ if ( ! $is_single_post_type && empty( $args['s'] ) ) {
add_filter( 'posts_orderby', '_acf_orderby_post_type', 10, 2 );
}
@@ -1372,10 +1372,30 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
$posts = get_posts( $args );
// remove this filter (only once)
- if ( ! $is_single_post_type ) {
+ if ( ! $is_single_post_type && empty( $args['s'] ) ) {
remove_filter( 'posts_orderby', '_acf_orderby_post_type', 10, 2 );
}
+ /*
+ * Optionally return every post as a single group, keyed by the caller supplied
+ * label, instead of one group per post type. Grouping partitions the results by
+ * post type, which discards the ordering the query itself established, so search
+ * callers that care about relevance (rather than browsing by type) opt out.
+ */
+ if ( ! empty( $args['acf_flat'] ) ) {
+ $this_group = array();
+
+ foreach ( $posts as $post ) {
+ $this_group[ $post->ID ] = $post;
+ }
+
+ if ( ! empty( $this_group ) ) {
+ $data[ $args['acf_flat'] ] = $this_group;
+ }
+
+ return $data;
+ }
+
// loop
foreach ( $post_types as $post_type ) {
diff --git a/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php b/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
index 880175091f..0defe08314 100644
--- a/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
+++ b/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
@@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ if ( ! class_exists( 'acf_field_relationship' ) ) :
// Re-normalize in case a filter reset `post_status` to 'any' while leaving `perm=readable`.
$args = acf_ensure_perm_readable_post_status( $args );
+ /*
+ * While searching, skip the per post type grouping so that results stay in
+ * the order the query returned them (relevance), rather than being split
+ * into post type groups that each get their own optgroup heading.
+ */
+ if ( $is_search ) {
+ $args['acf_flat'] = 'search';
+ }
+
// get posts grouped by post type
$groups = acf_get_grouped_posts( $args );
@@ -306,7 +315,7 @@ if ( ! class_exists( 'acf_field_relationship' ) ) :
}
// add as optgroup or results
- if ( count( $args['post_type'] ) === 1 ) {
+ if ( count( $args['post_type'] ) === 1 || ! empty( $args['acf_flat'] ) ) {
$results = $results[0]['children'];
}
- 主要言語
- PHP
- スター
- 947
- フォーク
- 198
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
環境構築
このプロジェクトには開発コンテナ、Dockerfile、コントリビューションガイドがありません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
AdvancedCustomFields/acf のほかの issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1056 ·
-
PHP 8.5: "Using null as an array offset" deprecation in ACF_Data::is() when rendering a block with empty data (local-meta.php is_request)対応中かも @faisalahammad が 30 日前に担当しました。 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1044 ·
-
is_preview was called incorrectly notice on every early get_field() since 6.8.10 (acf_revisions::acf_validate_post_id)対応中かも @faisalahammad が 30 日前に担当しました。 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1041 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
True / False ACF control bug on RTL layouts対応中かも @elicohenator が 53 日前に担当しました。 オープン
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 86/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1038 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1034 · コメント 3 件 ·
AdvancedCustomFields/acf の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 78/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
メンテナーはふだん 3 日以内に返信
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 91/100
benjaminkott/bootstrap_package#1675 ·
-
sync-en
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 74/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
[Sync EN] Formatting improvements to "Large Objects (LOBs)" docs (#6056)対応中かも このイシューにリンクされたプルリクエストがオープン中、またはマージ済みです。 オープンsync-en
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 74/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信