Drop the "group by post type" in search results
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 50/100
Línea de trabajo
Start with acf_get_grouped_posts() in includes/api/api-helpers.php, where the search query's orderby and the _acf_orderby_post_type filter are applied, then with the search branch of the relationship field's AJAX query in includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php. Reproduce by searching a relationship field across several post types and checking that results are grouped. Done when a search returns title matches first in a flat list, and the existing grouped behaviour still works for browsing.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
The grouping by post type makes it near impossible to find content in very large sites through the search feature in fields like the relationship field.
Instead of surfacing a title match, the results will always first show much weaker matcher in post types that happen to appear earlier.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Have a large site with many post types
- Have a relationship field that allows content from multiple post types
- Try searching for an exact title match for something that has a post type that isn't one of the earliest when sorting types.
- You will see much weaker matches, i.e. individual terms matched in body content.
- You need to scroll through all the weaker matches before finding your exact title match
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
I expect search to surface title matches first.
Version Information:
- WordPress Version 6.9
- PHP Version 8.4
- ACF Version latest
Suggested fix
diff --git a/includes/api/api-helpers.php b/includes/api/api-helpers.php
index c45f733b75..8a84c66f0e 100644
--- a/includes/api/api-helpers.php
+++ b/includes/api/api-helpers.php
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
'posts_per_page' => -1,
'paged' => 0,
'post_type' => 'post',
- 'orderby' => 'menu_order title',
+ 'orderby' => empty( $args['s'] ) ? 'menu_order title' : 'relevance',
'order' => 'ASC',
'post_status' => 'any',
'suppress_filters' => false,
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
}
// add filter to orderby post type
- if ( ! $is_single_post_type ) {
+ if ( ! $is_single_post_type && empty( $args['s'] ) ) {
add_filter( 'posts_orderby', '_acf_orderby_post_type', 10, 2 );
}
@@ -1372,10 +1372,30 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
$posts = get_posts( $args );
// remove this filter (only once)
- if ( ! $is_single_post_type ) {
+ if ( ! $is_single_post_type && empty( $args['s'] ) ) {
remove_filter( 'posts_orderby', '_acf_orderby_post_type', 10, 2 );
}
+ /*
+ * Optionally return every post as a single group, keyed by the caller supplied
+ * label, instead of one group per post type. Grouping partitions the results by
+ * post type, which discards the ordering the query itself established, so search
+ * callers that care about relevance (rather than browsing by type) opt out.
+ */
+ if ( ! empty( $args['acf_flat'] ) ) {
+ $this_group = array();
+
+ foreach ( $posts as $post ) {
+ $this_group[ $post->ID ] = $post;
+ }
+
+ if ( ! empty( $this_group ) ) {
+ $data[ $args['acf_flat'] ] = $this_group;
+ }
+
+ return $data;
+ }
+
// loop
foreach ( $post_types as $post_type ) {
diff --git a/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php b/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
index 880175091f..0defe08314 100644
--- a/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
+++ b/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
@@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ if ( ! class_exists( 'acf_field_relationship' ) ) :
// Re-normalize in case a filter reset `post_status` to 'any' while leaving `perm=readable`.
$args = acf_ensure_perm_readable_post_status( $args );
+ /*
+ * While searching, skip the per post type grouping so that results stay in
+ * the order the query returned them (relevance), rather than being split
+ * into post type groups that each get their own optgroup heading.
+ */
+ if ( $is_search ) {
+ $args['acf_flat'] = 'search';
+ }
+
// get posts grouped by post type
$groups = acf_get_grouped_posts( $args );
@@ -306,7 +315,7 @@ if ( ! class_exists( 'acf_field_relationship' ) ) :
}
// add as optgroup or results
- if ( count( $args['post_type'] ) === 1 ) {
+ if ( count( $args['post_type'] ) === 1 || ! empty( $args['acf_flat'] ) ) {
$results = $results[0]['children'];
}
- Lenguaje dominante
- PHP
- Estrellas
- 947
- Forks
- 198
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de AdvancedCustomFields/acf
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1056 ·
-
PHP 8.5: "Using null as an array offset" deprecation in ACF_Data::is() when rendering a block with empty data (local-meta.php is_request)Posiblemente ocupada @faisalahammad la tomó hace 30 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1044 ·
-
is_preview was called incorrectly notice on every early get_field() since 6.8.10 (acf_revisions::acf_validate_post_id)Posiblemente ocupada @faisalahammad la tomó hace 30 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1041 · 1 comentario ·
-
True / False ACF control bug on RTL layoutsPosiblemente ocupada @elicohenator la tomó hace 53 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1038 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1034 · 3 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de AdvancedCustomFields/acf
Issues similares
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 91/100
benjaminkott/bootstrap_package#1675 ·
-
sync-en
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Sync EN] Formatting improvements to "Large Objects (LOBs)" docs (#6056)Posiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertosync-en
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día