Drop the "group by post type" in search results
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 50/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with acf_get_grouped_posts() in includes/api/api-helpers.php, where the search query's orderby and the _acf_orderby_post_type filter are applied, then with the search branch of the relationship field's AJAX query in includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php. Reproduce by searching a relationship field across several post types and checking that results are grouped. Done when a search returns title matches first in a flat list, and the existing grouped behaviour still works for browsing.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
The grouping by post type makes it near impossible to find content in very large sites through the search feature in fields like the relationship field.
Instead of surfacing a title match, the results will always first show much weaker matcher in post types that happen to appear earlier.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
- Have a large site with many post types
- Have a relationship field that allows content from multiple post types
- Try searching for an exact title match for something that has a post type that isn't one of the earliest when sorting types.
- You will see much weaker matches, i.e. individual terms matched in body content.
- You need to scroll through all the weaker matches before finding your exact title match
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
I expect search to surface title matches first.
Version Information:
- WordPress Version 6.9
- PHP Version 8.4
- ACF Version latest
Suggested fix
diff --git a/includes/api/api-helpers.php b/includes/api/api-helpers.php
index c45f733b75..8a84c66f0e 100644
--- a/includes/api/api-helpers.php
+++ b/includes/api/api-helpers.php
@@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
'posts_per_page' => -1,
'paged' => 0,
'post_type' => 'post',
- 'orderby' => 'menu_order title',
+ 'orderby' => empty( $args['s'] ) ? 'menu_order title' : 'relevance',
'order' => 'ASC',
'post_status' => 'any',
'suppress_filters' => false,
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
}
// add filter to orderby post type
- if ( ! $is_single_post_type ) {
+ if ( ! $is_single_post_type && empty( $args['s'] ) ) {
add_filter( 'posts_orderby', '_acf_orderby_post_type', 10, 2 );
}
@@ -1372,10 +1372,30 @@ function acf_get_grouped_posts( $args ) {
$posts = get_posts( $args );
// remove this filter (only once)
- if ( ! $is_single_post_type ) {
+ if ( ! $is_single_post_type && empty( $args['s'] ) ) {
remove_filter( 'posts_orderby', '_acf_orderby_post_type', 10, 2 );
}
+ /*
+ * Optionally return every post as a single group, keyed by the caller supplied
+ * label, instead of one group per post type. Grouping partitions the results by
+ * post type, which discards the ordering the query itself established, so search
+ * callers that care about relevance (rather than browsing by type) opt out.
+ */
+ if ( ! empty( $args['acf_flat'] ) ) {
+ $this_group = array();
+
+ foreach ( $posts as $post ) {
+ $this_group[ $post->ID ] = $post;
+ }
+
+ if ( ! empty( $this_group ) ) {
+ $data[ $args['acf_flat'] ] = $this_group;
+ }
+
+ return $data;
+ }
+
// loop
foreach ( $post_types as $post_type ) {
diff --git a/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php b/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
index 880175091f..0defe08314 100644
--- a/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
+++ b/includes/fields/class-acf-field-relationship.php
@@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ if ( ! class_exists( 'acf_field_relationship' ) ) :
// Re-normalize in case a filter reset `post_status` to 'any' while leaving `perm=readable`.
$args = acf_ensure_perm_readable_post_status( $args );
+ /*
+ * While searching, skip the per post type grouping so that results stay in
+ * the order the query returned them (relevance), rather than being split
+ * into post type groups that each get their own optgroup heading.
+ */
+ if ( $is_search ) {
+ $args['acf_flat'] = 'search';
+ }
+
// get posts grouped by post type
$groups = acf_get_grouped_posts( $args );
@@ -306,7 +315,7 @@ if ( ! class_exists( 'acf_field_relationship' ) ) :
}
// add as optgroup or results
- if ( count( $args['post_type'] ) === 1 ) {
+ if ( count( $args['post_type'] ) === 1 || ! empty( $args['acf_flat'] ) ) {
$results = $results[0]['children'];
}
- Lingua principale
- PHP
- Stelle
- 947
- Fork
- 198
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di AdvancedCustomFields/acf
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1056 ·
-
PHP 8.5: "Using null as an array offset" deprecation in ACF_Data::is() when rendering a block with empty data (local-meta.php is_request)Forse già presa @faisalahammad l’ha presa 30 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 68/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1044 ·
-
is_preview was called incorrectly notice on every early get_field() since 6.8.10 (acf_revisions::acf_validate_post_id)Forse già presa @faisalahammad l’ha presa 30 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1041 · 1 commento ·
-
True / False ACF control bug on RTL layoutsForse già presa @elicohenator l’ha presa 53 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 86/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1038 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
AdvancedCustomFields/acf#1034 · 3 commenti ·
Tutte le issue di AdvancedCustomFields/acf
Issue simili
-
bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 84/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 91/100
benjaminkott/bootstrap_package#1675 ·
-
sync-en
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Sync EN] Formatting improvements to "Large Objects (LOBs)" docs (#6056)Forse già presa Una pull request collegata a questa issue è aperta o già unita. Apertasync-en
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno