Self-hosted platform: derive the R2 upload keys from the runtime API token
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 34/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- github, typescript
Direzione di ricerca
Start with platform-lifecycle.ts, platform-management.ts, and platform-installer-secrets.ts; trace how runtime tokens and R2 credentials reach createPlatformInstallationSecrets and installPlatform. Check the token verification flow against platform/packages/api/src/email/cf-customer.ts and add coverage for both fallback directions, fresh installs, and token rotation. Done means derived credentials follow the specified precedence and recovery rules, with the docs updated and the Cloudflare token ID and presigned PUT behavior verified.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Problem
A self-hosted platform install asks for two extra pasted values on a separate
Cloudflare page: the R2 Access Key ID and Secret Access Key
(packages/void/src/cli/platform-lifecycle.ts, the R2 block after the GitHub
OAuth prompts; page platformSetupPages(plan).r2 in platform-setup.ts).
The keys are only used by the API Worker to presign direct-to-R2 asset PUTs
(platform/packages/api/src/routes/deploy.ts presignAssetPut,
platform/packages/api/src/r2-presign.ts). They are not checked at install time,
so a wrong pair only fails at the first void deploy --platform void that
uploads assets (packages/void/src/cli/direct-r2-upload.ts, raw
R2 PUT failed for <path> (<hash>): 403).
Cloudflare documents that an API token can act as an S3 key pair:
Access Key ID = the token ID, Secret Access Key = SHA-256 hex of the token value
(https://developers.cloudflare.com/r2/api/tokens/). The runtime token already
has Account → Workers R2 Storage → Edit, and the API Worker already holds it as
CF_API_TOKEN, so deriving the pair adds no new permission to any Worker.
Proposed design
fresh interactive or CI install
runtime token verified ──▶ GET /user/tokens/verify (fallback /accounts/:id/tokens/verify)
──▶ r2AccessKeyId = result.id
r2SecretAccessKey = sha256hex(runtime token)
explicit VOID_PLATFORM_R2_ACCESS_KEY_ID + _SECRET_ACCESS_KEY pair still wins
upgrade / repair with a new VOID_PLATFORM_RUNTIME_CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN
recovery r2SecretAccessKey == sha256hex(recovery cloudflareApiToken)? (or no recovery)
yes ──▶ derive again, update R2_* Worker secrets together with CF_API_TOKEN
no ──▶ keep the separately supplied pair
PlatformCloudflareClient.apiTokenId(accountId): token-verify lookup, returns a
non-empty id without whitespace, otherwise throws.platform-installer-secrets.ts:platformR2SecretFromToken,
platformR2KeysFollowRuntimeToken(recovery),platformR2CredentialsFromRuntimeToken.- Lifecycle: remove the R2 page and both prompts; derive after the runtime token
is verified. platform-management.ts: derive on runtime-token rotation when the saved
pair was derived from the previous token.- Docs: credentials.md (R2 section), ci.md (R2 rows optional), maintenance.md
(rotation replaces derived keys; recreating the API needs R2 values only for
a separate R2 token), development/runtime.md (drop R2 from needed inputs).
Problems to fix in this design before implementing
- Order in
platform-management.ts: the keys cannot be derived both before
createPlatformInstallationSecretsand after the runtime-token preflight, because
the preflight (resolvePlatformRuntimeTokenToPreflight(plan, secrets)) reads the
result ofcreatePlatformInstallationSecrets. Derive before
createPlatformInstallationSecretsand leave the preflight where it is; the
token-verify call already rejects an invalid token. - Token-ID lookup order: trying account verify first and falling back only on
401/403/404 is not enough. What/accounts/:id/tokens/verifyreturns for a user token is
unverified (it may be 400). Match
platform/packages/api/src/email/cf-customer.tsverifyToken(user verify
first, then account verify), or fall back on any 4xx except 429. Rethrow 5xx.
Test both fallback directions. - Precedence on a non-draft resume:
configured()in the lifecycle returns
values[key] || envwhencredentialSetupis false. Reading the env pair first
in every mode flips that; withexistingInstallationand no
updateExistingWorkers, the live API Worker keeps its old R2 secret while
recovery saves the env pair, and later hash matching compares the wrong value.
Apply the env pair only whencredentialSetupis true; otherwise keep the
checkpoint values. - "Set both or neither": a new error for a half-set env pair can break a resume
that works today (one variable set, the other from the checkpoint). Apply the
check only on a fresh install (credentialSetup).
Tests this design needs: derived values reach createPlatformInstallationSecrets
and installPlatform on a fresh interactive install (token id from a spied
apiTokenId, secret = sha256 of the runtime token); the half-set env pair
error; upgrade with a rotated runtime token updates R2_ACCESS_KEY_ID /
R2_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY only when the saved pair was derived.
Unverified before merge
/user/tokens/verifyor/accounts/:id/tokens/verifyreturnsidfor an
account-owned runtime token (cfat_…), and a presigned PUT signed with the
derived pair succeeds on the e2e account.- Without recovery data, a rotation would also rewrite a separately supplied
pair. It keeps working (the runtime token has R2 Edit), but it changes
"only supplied values replace live credentials"; docs must say so.
Related, separate
An install-time R2 key check would also catch a wrong pasted pair before the
first deploy (today it surfaces as a raw 403 from direct-r2-upload.ts).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
- Lingua principale
- TypeScript
- Stelle
- 402
- Fork
- 32
- Merge medio
- 12h 28m
- PR unite (30g)
- 77
Preparare l'ambiente
Questo progetto non fornisce container di sviluppo, Dockerfile né guida per i contributori, quindi l'ambiente è a tuo carico: parti dal suo README e consulta la nostra guida al primo contributo per i passaggi generali.
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di voidzero-dev/void
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
voidzero-dev/void#478 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
voidzero-dev/void#463 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Deploy after a secret change fails for Workers over ~750 KB: source read-back capped at 1 MiBAperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
voidzero-dev/void#459 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug
Difficoltà 1/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
voidzero-dev/void#428 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 68/100
voidzero-dev/void#480 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di voidzero-dev/void
Issue simili
-
documentation
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
components-web-app/docs#260 ·
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 65/100
521xueweihan/HelloGitHub#4025 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
ctrf-io/playwright-ctrf-json-reporter#117 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
chore docs good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 87/100
Karthik-beta/Blinkql#105 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno