Self-hosted platform: derive the R2 upload keys from the runtime API token
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 34/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- github, typescript
Línea de trabajo
Start with platform-lifecycle.ts, platform-management.ts, and platform-installer-secrets.ts; trace how runtime tokens and R2 credentials reach createPlatformInstallationSecrets and installPlatform. Check the token verification flow against platform/packages/api/src/email/cf-customer.ts and add coverage for both fallback directions, fresh installs, and token rotation. Done means derived credentials follow the specified precedence and recovery rules, with the docs updated and the Cloudflare token ID and presigned PUT behavior verified.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
A self-hosted platform install asks for two extra pasted values on a separate
Cloudflare page: the R2 Access Key ID and Secret Access Key
(packages/void/src/cli/platform-lifecycle.ts, the R2 block after the GitHub
OAuth prompts; page platformSetupPages(plan).r2 in platform-setup.ts).
The keys are only used by the API Worker to presign direct-to-R2 asset PUTs
(platform/packages/api/src/routes/deploy.ts presignAssetPut,
platform/packages/api/src/r2-presign.ts). They are not checked at install time,
so a wrong pair only fails at the first void deploy --platform void that
uploads assets (packages/void/src/cli/direct-r2-upload.ts, raw
R2 PUT failed for <path> (<hash>): 403).
Cloudflare documents that an API token can act as an S3 key pair:
Access Key ID = the token ID, Secret Access Key = SHA-256 hex of the token value
(https://developers.cloudflare.com/r2/api/tokens/). The runtime token already
has Account → Workers R2 Storage → Edit, and the API Worker already holds it as
CF_API_TOKEN, so deriving the pair adds no new permission to any Worker.
Proposed design
fresh interactive or CI install
runtime token verified ──▶ GET /user/tokens/verify (fallback /accounts/:id/tokens/verify)
──▶ r2AccessKeyId = result.id
r2SecretAccessKey = sha256hex(runtime token)
explicit VOID_PLATFORM_R2_ACCESS_KEY_ID + _SECRET_ACCESS_KEY pair still wins
upgrade / repair with a new VOID_PLATFORM_RUNTIME_CLOUDFLARE_API_TOKEN
recovery r2SecretAccessKey == sha256hex(recovery cloudflareApiToken)? (or no recovery)
yes ──▶ derive again, update R2_* Worker secrets together with CF_API_TOKEN
no ──▶ keep the separately supplied pair
PlatformCloudflareClient.apiTokenId(accountId): token-verify lookup, returns a
non-empty id without whitespace, otherwise throws.platform-installer-secrets.ts:platformR2SecretFromToken,
platformR2KeysFollowRuntimeToken(recovery),platformR2CredentialsFromRuntimeToken.- Lifecycle: remove the R2 page and both prompts; derive after the runtime token
is verified. platform-management.ts: derive on runtime-token rotation when the saved
pair was derived from the previous token.- Docs: credentials.md (R2 section), ci.md (R2 rows optional), maintenance.md
(rotation replaces derived keys; recreating the API needs R2 values only for
a separate R2 token), development/runtime.md (drop R2 from needed inputs).
Problems to fix in this design before implementing
- Order in
platform-management.ts: the keys cannot be derived both before
createPlatformInstallationSecretsand after the runtime-token preflight, because
the preflight (resolvePlatformRuntimeTokenToPreflight(plan, secrets)) reads the
result ofcreatePlatformInstallationSecrets. Derive before
createPlatformInstallationSecretsand leave the preflight where it is; the
token-verify call already rejects an invalid token. - Token-ID lookup order: trying account verify first and falling back only on
401/403/404 is not enough. What/accounts/:id/tokens/verifyreturns for a user token is
unverified (it may be 400). Match
platform/packages/api/src/email/cf-customer.tsverifyToken(user verify
first, then account verify), or fall back on any 4xx except 429. Rethrow 5xx.
Test both fallback directions. - Precedence on a non-draft resume:
configured()in the lifecycle returns
values[key] || envwhencredentialSetupis false. Reading the env pair first
in every mode flips that; withexistingInstallationand no
updateExistingWorkers, the live API Worker keeps its old R2 secret while
recovery saves the env pair, and later hash matching compares the wrong value.
Apply the env pair only whencredentialSetupis true; otherwise keep the
checkpoint values. - "Set both or neither": a new error for a half-set env pair can break a resume
that works today (one variable set, the other from the checkpoint). Apply the
check only on a fresh install (credentialSetup).
Tests this design needs: derived values reach createPlatformInstallationSecrets
and installPlatform on a fresh interactive install (token id from a spied
apiTokenId, secret = sha256 of the runtime token); the half-set env pair
error; upgrade with a rotated runtime token updates R2_ACCESS_KEY_ID /
R2_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY only when the saved pair was derived.
Unverified before merge
/user/tokens/verifyor/accounts/:id/tokens/verifyreturnsidfor an
account-owned runtime token (cfat_…), and a presigned PUT signed with the
derived pair succeeds on the e2e account.- Without recovery data, a rotation would also rewrite a separately supplied
pair. It keeps working (the runtime token has R2 Edit), but it changes
"only supplied values replace live credentials"; docs must say so.
Related, separate
An install-time R2 key check would also catch a wrong pasted pair before the
first deploy (today it surfaces as a raw 403 from direct-r2-upload.ts).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 402
- Forks
- 32
- Merge medio
- 13 h 14 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 73
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de voidzero-dev/void
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
voidzero-dev/void#463 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Deploy after a secret change fails for Workers over ~750 KB: source read-back capped at 1 MiBAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
voidzero-dev/void#459 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
voidzero-dev/void#428 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 53/100
voidzero-dev/void#472 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 52/100
voidzero-dev/void#471 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de voidzero-dev/void
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
auth: agent-bearer --manager-call is told to use the MCP instance argument on an ambiguous managerAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 80/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Lyric and ApostrophesAbiertobug module: playback
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
chthollyphile/folia-major#739 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
agilepathway/label-checker#773 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día