Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[feat]: slotController synchronous `hostUpdated()`

Aperta
#3,103 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
55/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Stack tecnologico
typescript
Ambito
frontend

Direzione di ricerca

Start by locating the slotController implementation and the SlotControllerPublicAPI declaration, then trace hostConnected, #initSlotMap, the MutationObserver, and the hasSlotted(), isEmpty(), and getSlotted() methods. Implement the synchronous lifecycle described in the issue and verify initial connection, reconnection, and child mutations produce correct slot state without an async timing gap.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

Alternative approach:

synchronous hostUpdated() instead of async fallback

The current fix adds a fallback in getSlotted() to query slot elements directly when #slotRecords hasn't been populated yet. This addresses the symptom but leaves the root cause: hostConnected and #initSlotMap are async, creating a timing gap where no data source exists.

The gap also affects hasSlotted() and isEmpty(), which aren't addressed here.

Why hostConnected is async

Both hostConnected and #initSlotMap await host.updateComplete just to ensure the shadow DOM exists so they can query for elements. But Lit already provides a synchronous hook that guarantees this: hostUpdated(), which runs after every render when the DOM has been committed.

Suggested change

Make hostConnected synchronous (just sets up the MutationObserver), move record initialization to hostUpdated(), and have the MutationObserver trigger a re-render instead of calling #initSlotMap directly:

  hostConnected(): void {
    this.#mo.observe(this.host, { childList: true });
    this.#slotRecords.clear();
  }

  hostUpdated(): void {
    if (this.#slotRecords.size === 0) {
      for (let slotName of this.#slotNames.concat(Object.values(this.#deprecations))) {
        slotName ||= SlotController.default;
        const slot = this.#getSlotElement(slotName);
        if (slot) {
          this.#slotRecords.set(slotName, new SlotRecord(slot, slotName, this.host));
        }
      }
      if (this.#slotRecords.size > 0) {
        this.host.requestUpdate();
      }
    }
  }

The MutationObserver callback becomes:

#mo = new MutationObserver(() => this.host.requestUpdate());

And #initSlotMap can be removed entirely.

This also requires updating the SlotControllerPublicAPI declaration to match:

hostConnected?(): void;

Why this works

  • First render: Records empty, isEmpty() returns true (matches SSR server behavior). hostUpdated() populates records and calls requestUpdate().
  • Second render: Records exist, isEmpty()/getSlotted() read live DOM via SlotRecord getters, correct results. hostUpdated() sees records exist, no requestUpdate(), no infinite loop.
  • MutationObserver: Child changes trigger requestUpdate() → re-render → SlotRecord getters reflect new DOM state. No record rebuild needed since they query live DOM.
  • Reconnection: hostConnected clears records → next render → hostUpdated() repopulates.

What this fixes that the current PR doesn't

  • hasSlotted() and isEmpty() have the same timing gap, they also read from #slotRecords and return incorrect results before async init completes. The hostUpdated() approach fixes all three methods.
  • Eliminates the async architecture that caused the issue rather than working around it.

Trade-off

The two-render pattern on initial connection is inherent <slot> elements are created by render(), so the first render can't know about them. This was already the case with the async approach.

We can spin this off to another issue if we feel the need

Originally posted by @zeroedin in https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly-elements/issues/3093#issuecomment-4252752632

Lingua principale
TypeScript
Stelle
394
Fork
107
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di patternfly/patternfly-elements

Tutte le issue di patternfly/patternfly-elements

Issue simili

Altre issue su TypeScript

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.