Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

[feat]: slotController synchronous `hostUpdated()`

Ouverte
#3,103 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
55/100
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
Calme
Stack technique
typescript
Domaine
frontend

Piste de recherche

Start by locating the slotController implementation and the SlotControllerPublicAPI declaration, then trace hostConnected, #initSlotMap, the MutationObserver, and the hasSlotted(), isEmpty(), and getSlotted() methods. Implement the synchronous lifecycle described in the issue and verify initial connection, reconnection, and child mutations produce correct slot state without an async timing gap.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

Alternative approach:

synchronous hostUpdated() instead of async fallback

The current fix adds a fallback in getSlotted() to query slot elements directly when #slotRecords hasn't been populated yet. This addresses the symptom but leaves the root cause: hostConnected and #initSlotMap are async, creating a timing gap where no data source exists.

The gap also affects hasSlotted() and isEmpty(), which aren't addressed here.

Why hostConnected is async

Both hostConnected and #initSlotMap await host.updateComplete just to ensure the shadow DOM exists so they can query for elements. But Lit already provides a synchronous hook that guarantees this: hostUpdated(), which runs after every render when the DOM has been committed.

Suggested change

Make hostConnected synchronous (just sets up the MutationObserver), move record initialization to hostUpdated(), and have the MutationObserver trigger a re-render instead of calling #initSlotMap directly:

  hostConnected(): void {
    this.#mo.observe(this.host, { childList: true });
    this.#slotRecords.clear();
  }

  hostUpdated(): void {
    if (this.#slotRecords.size === 0) {
      for (let slotName of this.#slotNames.concat(Object.values(this.#deprecations))) {
        slotName ||= SlotController.default;
        const slot = this.#getSlotElement(slotName);
        if (slot) {
          this.#slotRecords.set(slotName, new SlotRecord(slot, slotName, this.host));
        }
      }
      if (this.#slotRecords.size > 0) {
        this.host.requestUpdate();
      }
    }
  }

The MutationObserver callback becomes:

#mo = new MutationObserver(() => this.host.requestUpdate());

And #initSlotMap can be removed entirely.

This also requires updating the SlotControllerPublicAPI declaration to match:

hostConnected?(): void;

Why this works

  • First render: Records empty, isEmpty() returns true (matches SSR server behavior). hostUpdated() populates records and calls requestUpdate().
  • Second render: Records exist, isEmpty()/getSlotted() read live DOM via SlotRecord getters, correct results. hostUpdated() sees records exist, no requestUpdate(), no infinite loop.
  • MutationObserver: Child changes trigger requestUpdate() → re-render → SlotRecord getters reflect new DOM state. No record rebuild needed since they query live DOM.
  • Reconnection: hostConnected clears records → next render → hostUpdated() repopulates.

What this fixes that the current PR doesn't

  • hasSlotted() and isEmpty() have the same timing gap, they also read from #slotRecords and return incorrect results before async init completes. The hostUpdated() approach fixes all three methods.
  • Eliminates the async architecture that caused the issue rather than working around it.

Trade-off

The two-render pattern on initial connection is inherent <slot> elements are created by render(), so the first render can't know about them. This was already the case with the async approach.

We can spin this off to another issue if we feel the need

Originally posted by @zeroedin in https://github.com/patternfly/patternfly-elements/issues/3093#issuecomment-4252752632

Langage dominant
TypeScript
Étoiles
394
Forks
107
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de patternfly/patternfly-elements

Toutes les issues de patternfly/patternfly-elements

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues TypeScript

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.