Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

fix(review): AI review lanes report success without posting a review on large PRs

Aperta
  • Qualcosa non va?
#7,257 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
45/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
git, github-actions, shell
Ambito
ci-cd, tooling

Direzione di ricerca

Start by locating the Claude review and security review lane workflows, then trace how each lane records completion and writes the “reviewed through” marker. Reproduce the large pull request behavior described for #7009 and inspect how diff retrieval handles GitHub’s 300-file cap. Done means incomplete lanes report failure or neutral and omit the marker, with full diff coverage or a summary that identifies partial coverage.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

needs-human

Problem

On a large pull request, both AI review lanes conclude success without posting any review.

Observed on #7009 (828 changed files, head 55236cd59; runs 38179498349 and 38179498378, both success):

  • claude-review: the sticky progress comment stopped with 2 of 8 checklist items ticked. "Verify candidate findings, post inline comments" and "Final summary" were never reached. The comment says gh pr diff/gh api hit GitHub's 300-file diff cap and git fetch had no network, so the review covered only the 100 files supplied in context. No inline comments or review were posted.
  • claude-security-review: the sticky comment stopped at "Fan out 4 hunters ... running". "Adversarially verify" and "Post findings" were never ticked. No findings were posted.
  • Both posted a "reviewed through " marker anyway.

A green check row therefore claims a review that did not happen.

Expected

  • A lane that does not reach its post or summary step concludes as failure or neutral, not success, and does not write the "reviewed through" marker.
  • claude-review gets the full diff without the 300-file API cap (for example a local git diff against a fetched base), or says in its summary that coverage was partial and which files it skipped.
Lingua principale
Shell
Stelle
22
Fork
2
Merge medio
8h 27m
PR unite (30g)
957

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

Tutte le issue di melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

Issue simili

Altre issue su Shell/Bash

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.