Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

fix(review): AI review lanes report success without posting a review on large PRs

Abierto
#7,257 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
git, github-actions, shell
Área
ci-cd, tooling

Línea de trabajo

Start by locating the Claude review and security review lane workflows, then trace how each lane records completion and writes the “reviewed through” marker. Reproduce the large pull request behavior described for #7009 and inspect how diff retrieval handles GitHub’s 300-file cap. Done means incomplete lanes report failure or neutral and omit the marker, with full diff coverage or a summary that identifies partial coverage.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

needs-human

Problem

On a large pull request, both AI review lanes conclude success without posting any review.

Observed on #7009 (828 changed files, head 55236cd59; runs 38179498349 and 38179498378, both success):

  • claude-review: the sticky progress comment stopped with 2 of 8 checklist items ticked. "Verify candidate findings, post inline comments" and "Final summary" were never reached. The comment says gh pr diff/gh api hit GitHub's 300-file diff cap and git fetch had no network, so the review covered only the 100 files supplied in context. No inline comments or review were posted.
  • claude-security-review: the sticky comment stopped at "Fan out 4 hunters ... running". "Adversarially verify" and "Post findings" were never ticked. No findings were posted.
  • Both posted a "reviewed through " marker anyway.

A green check row therefore claims a review that did not happen.

Expected

  • A lane that does not reach its post or summary step concludes as failure or neutral, not success, and does not write the "reviewed through" marker.
  • claude-review gets the full diff without the 300-file API cap (for example a local git diff against a fetched base), or says in its summary that coverage was partial and which files it skipped.
Lenguaje dominante
Shell
Estrellas
22
Forks
2
Merge medio
8 h 27 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
957

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

Todos los issues de melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

Issues similares

Más issues de Shell/Bash

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.