fix(review): AI review lanes report success without posting a review on large PRs
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by locating the Claude review and security review lane workflows, then trace how each lane records completion and writes the “reviewed through” marker. Reproduce the large pull request behavior described for #7009 and inspect how diff retrieval handles GitHub’s 300-file cap. Done means incomplete lanes report failure or neutral and omit the marker, with full diff coverage or a summary that identifies partial coverage.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Problem
On a large pull request, both AI review lanes conclude success without posting any review.
Observed on #7009 (828 changed files, head 55236cd59; runs 38179498349 and 38179498378, both success):
- claude-review: the sticky progress comment stopped with 2 of 8 checklist items ticked. "Verify candidate findings, post inline comments" and "Final summary" were never reached. The comment says
gh pr diff/gh apihit GitHub's 300-file diff cap and git fetch had no network, so the review covered only the 100 files supplied in context. No inline comments or review were posted. - claude-security-review: the sticky comment stopped at "Fan out 4 hunters ... running". "Adversarially verify" and "Post findings" were never ticked. No findings were posted.
- Both posted a "reviewed through " marker anyway.
A green check row therefore claims a review that did not happen.
Expected
- A lane that does not reach its post or summary step concludes as failure or neutral, not success, and does not write the "reviewed through" marker.
- claude-review gets the full diff without the 300-file API cap (for example a local
git diffagainst a fetched base), or says in its summary that coverage was partial and which files it skipped.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Shell
- Estrellas
- 22
- Forks
- 2
- Merge medio
- 8 h 27 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 957
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
-
priority: medium
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#7351 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
agent-ready priority: high work-class: scoped
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#7312 · 3 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
priority: medium
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#7288 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
knowledge: docpage-digest dual verification defines no verdict vocabulary or pass/fail thresholdAbiertoneeds-human
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#7286 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
priority: low
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
melodic-software/claude-code-plugins#7282 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
Issues similares
-
Sourced-library load-guards use a top-level `return` that errors on direct execution (repo-wide)Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
rossoctl/automation#115 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
loongarch64: `unsupported linker arg: --no-rosegment` with rustc 1.100Posiblemente ocupada @monosans la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
rust-cross/cargo-zigbuild#503 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
netbox status: backlog topic: testing type: housekeeping
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
netbox-community/netbox#23395 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
test/command failure with filtered `listxattr` syscallPosiblemente ocupada @Kiskae la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día