Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

fix(ci): AI review lanes conclude success without posting a review

Chiusa
#7,244 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
48/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
github-actions, shell

Direzione di ricerca

Start by tracing the pr-review / claude-review-status and pr-review-security / security-review lanes and the pull-request skill's B2 productivity check. Compare the cited runs with each lane's success and reviewed-through marker logic, and read related issue #6421 for the permission-denial case. Done means success requires a completed review for the current head; runs that stop before posting findings fail or go neutral and write no reviewed-through marker.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

needs-human needs-triage

Problem

On #7220 the pr-review / claude-review-status lane concluded success on 3 of 4 rounds (heads b8766bd, fd16ce7, 3ad3a24) without posting findings or a completed review: each run stopped at "Adversarially verify" or "Fan out a hunter" in its checklist. pr-review-security / security-review did the same on 4064589 and b8766bd. On #7221 the claude-review lane also posted nothing for head 1c371df. A green check therefore does not mean a review happened; the merge agents caught it only through the pull-request skill's B2 productivity check and stood a local review in.

#6421 reports the security-lane variant caused by permission denials. This issue covers both lanes and the general rule: a run that did not reach its post-findings step must not conclude success.

Expected

A review-lane run concludes success only after it posts a completed review (findings or an explicit no-findings verdict) for the current head; otherwise it fails or goes neutral with the reason, and writes no reviewed-through marker.

Evidence

  • #7220: claude-review on b8766bd, fd16ce7, 3ad3a24; security-review on 4064589, b8766bd.
  • #7221: claude-review on 1c371df (issue comment 6112958402 records the substitute review).
  • Related: #6421.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Lingua principale
Shell
Stelle
22
Fork
2
Merge medio
8h 44m
PR unite (30g)
926

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

Tutte le issue di melodic-software/claude-code-plugins

Issue simili

Altre issue su Shell/Bash

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.