[Bug] Flaky SIGSEGV in VariantParquetTest: Arrow IO thread frees PoolBuffer after the test's memory pool is destroyed
@SteNicholas ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 23/9/2026.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.
Descrizione
Search before asking
- I searched in the issues and found nothing similar.
Paimon-cpp version
main, observed on commit dc745fe91932dc2cba919fb13639dfc427280006 (the change in that commit only touches realtime/, unrelated to this failure).
Minimal reproduce step
Flaky; observed in CI job gcc-release-x86_64: https://github.com/apache/paimon-cpp/actions/runs/35845901520/job/107134278444
paimon-parquet-format-test crashes with SIGSEGV right after VariantParquetTest.WriteAndReadRoundTrip passes, while VariantParquetTest.ShreddedWriteAndReadRoundTrip is starting:
[ RUN ] VariantParquetTest.ShreddedWriteAndReadRoundTrip
build_support/run-test.sh: line 98: 67868 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Thread 1 (Arrow IO thread pool):
#0 arrow::PoolBuffer::~PoolBuffer()
#1 arrow::Future<std::shared_ptr<arrow::Buffer>>::SetResult(...)::{lambda(void*)#1}::_FUN(void*)
#2 arrow::ConcreteFutureImpl::~ConcreteFutureImpl()
#3 std::_Sp_counted_base<...>::_M_release_last_use_cold()
#4 arrow::internal::FnOnce<void ()>::FnImpl<std::_Bind<arrow::detail::ContinueFuture (arrow::Future<std::shared_ptr<arrow::Buffer>>, arrow::io::RandomAccessFile::ReadAsync(arrow::io::IOContext const&, long, long)::{lambda()#1})>>::~FnImpl()
#5 arrow::internal::ThreadPool::LaunchWorkersUnlocked(int)::{lambda()#1} ...
The main thread is already running the next test (VariantShreddingWritePlan::CreateFromPhysicalSchema) and is unrelated to the crash.
What doesn't meet your expectations?
The test binary should not crash. The crash is a use-after-free of the Arrow memory pool in the test fixture:
VariantParquetTest::SetUp()creates a per-test pool adaptor:arrow_pool_ = GetArrowPool(pool_);(src/paimon/format/parquet/variant_parquet_test.cpp). It is destroyed together with the fixture.- Several tests (
WriteAndReadRoundTrip,ShreddedWriteAndReadRoundTrip, and the helper around line 548) open the file for a raw sanity check with the plain Arrow reader:
Only the rawauto file = arrow::io::ReadableFile::Open(file_path_, arrow_pool_.get()); ::parquet::arrow::OpenFile(file.ValueOrDie(), arrow_pool_.get(), &raw_reader);arrow::MemoryPool*is passed, so nothing keeps the adaptor alive. - With Arrow 17,
ArrowReaderProperties::pre_buffer()defaults totrue, soReadTableissuesRandomAccessFile::ReadAsync.ReadableFiledoes not override it, so the base implementation submitsReadAtto the IO thread pool and the resultPoolBufferis allocated fromarrow_pool_. - The IO worker holds the last reference to the future (and therefore the buffer) until its task object is destroyed, which can happen after the reader has consumed the data and the test has finished. When the fixture is torn down first,
~PoolBuffer()callsFree()on the already destroyed adaptor -> SIGSEGV.
Paimon's own read path (ArrowInputStreamAdapter::ReadAsync) is not affected: it uses a callback-based implementation and already retains the pool with the returned buffer (#182). This issue is limited to tests that use arrow::io::ReadableFile with a raw pointer to a short-lived pool.
Anything else?
Possible fixes (test-only):
- Use a process-lifetime Arrow pool for these raw sanity-check readers, e.g.
arrow::default_memory_pool(), instead of the per-fixturearrow_pool_.get(); or - Disable pre-buffering for the raw reader (
ArrowReaderProperties::set_pre_buffer(false)), so no async IO task outlives the test; or - Read through
ArrowInputStreamAdapter, which keeps the pool alive for returned buffers.
Other tests using arrow::io::ReadableFile::Open(..., pool.get()) with a per-test pool may have the same latent issue and should be checked as well.
- Lingua principale
- C++
- Stelle
- 65
- Fork
- 29
- Merge medio
- 2g 11h
- PR unite (30g)
- 79
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di apache/paimon-cpp
-
enhancement
apache/paimon-cpp#381 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 30/100
apache/paimon-cpp#375 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 45/100
apache/paimon-cpp#361 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
apache/paimon-cpp#325 · 1 assegnatario ·
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
apache/paimon-cpp#319 · 1 reazione · 1 assegnatario ·
Tutte le issue di apache/paimon-cpp
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
-
good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
ros2/message_filters#338 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
subsurface/subsurface#4984 ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
flutter-webrtc/flutter-webrtc#2206 ·
-
litertlm-android AAR ships no consumer ProGuard rules → "mid == null" SIGABRT in minified apps Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
google-ai-edge/LiteRT-LM#3739 ·