Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

Track packages that are released in ROS build farm but are/should be in conda-forge

Aperta
#17 12 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
25/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Da chiarire
Stato di attività
Ferma
Stack tecnologico
cmake, debian
Ambito
build-system, devops

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia dalla tabella dei pacchetti e dalle issue collegate di conda-forge, rosdistro e correlate; confronta quali pacchetti sono duplicati e se i pacchetti vendor aggiungono file. Il lavoro è completo quando il progetto dispone di un metodo documentato e sistematico per identificare i pacchetti che dovrebbero usare conda-forge invece di essere ricostruiti tramite Bloom.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

The ROS Debian binary packages that are released via Bloom are essentially a distribution of software that builds on top of another distribution of software (the base Debian/Ubuntu repositories). This relation is similar to the one that in the conda world exists between conda-forge and bioconda channels, and in a sense is the same relation that we would like to create between conda-forge and robostack.

Over the time some packages that we not ROS-specific (i.e. they did not depend on the ROS communication middleware) were released with Bloom for several reasons. The major reason is that it was much faster and easier to get a package published via Bloom rather then by going through the actual Debian/Ubuntu packaging process, while in some other cases a package was indeed available in Debian/Ubuntu repos, but the version available in the repos was not recent enough, and it was not possible to update it due to Debian policies for updates in already released distros.

In the case of robostack, given that getting new packages in conda-forge is relatively easy and fast, and the same holds for updating the version of existing packages, I think it make sense to avoid to re-build packages that are or should be in conda-forge even if they are release in bloom/rosdistro, but rather we should have some systematic way to skip them and install the conda-forge version instead. I am not sure what is the proper way of doing so, but for the time being I opened this issue to track the occurrences of this pattern that I spot.

Package repo It is already in conda-forge? rosdistro package name Does the rosdistro package also adds some files? Related issue(s)
https://github.com/pybind/pybind11 https://github.com/conda-forge/pybind11-feedstock pybind11_catkin in ROS1, pybind11_vendor in ROS2 Yes https://github.com/RoboStack/ros-noetic/issues/19
https://github.com/OctoMap/octomap https://github.com/conda-forge/octomap-feedstock octomap No https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/26527
https://github.com/flexible-collision-library/fcl https://github.com/conda-forge/fcl-feedstock fcl No https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pull/27789
https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense No librealsense No https://github.com/robotology/robotology-superbuild/issues/564
https://github.com/borglab/gtsam Yes gtsam No https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pull/23198
https://github.com/ethz-adrl/ifopt No ifopt No
https://github.com/stack-of-tasks/pinocchio https://github.com/conda-forge/pinocchio-feedstock pinocchio No
https://github.com/oxfordcontrol/osqp Soon, https://github.com/conda-forge/staged-recipes/pull/13587 osqp_vendor Yes, the CMake config files for the osqp_vendor CMake package, and the osqp_vendor-extras.cmake file. See https://github.com/tier4/osqp_vendor
https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre https://github.com/conda-forge/ogre-feedstock rviz_ogre_vendor Yes, it also installs the CMake config files for the rviz_ogre_vendor CMake files, and some additional related files. Furthermore, just on Windows the used ogre also statically links a locally built copy of freetype and zlib.
https://github.com/stack-of-tasks/eigenpy Yes eigenpy No.
https://tvm.apache.org/ https://github.com/conda-forge/libtvm-feedstock tvm_vendor Yes, it even enables some options while compiling tvm, that are related to vulkan and spirv, that I am not sure if they are available in conda-forge.

Just for ROS2, there are a few more in https://github.com/ros2/?q=vendor .

Lingua principale
Astro
Stelle
385
Fork
36
Merge medio
5h 37m
PR unite (30g)
18

Guida per i contributori

Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di RoboStack/robostack.github.io

Tutte le issue di RoboStack/robostack.github.io

Issue simili

Altre issue su Build System

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.