[Bug]: Greenfield T-002 seed still fails the inception schema gate after T-3948 (fw init path not covered)
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 2/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-3 ore
- Idoneità per principianti
- 72/100
Direzione di ricerca
Leggi lib/seeds/tasks/greenfield/T-002-define-project-goals.md, lib/init.sh intorno alla riga 714 e lib/inception_schema_backfill.py; confronta il percorso di seed e init con la chiamata di backfill in lib/upgrade.sh intorno alla riga 1741. Aggiungi la copertura per un progetto appena inizializzato nei test Bats pertinenti, quindi verifica che T-002 superi il controllo dello schema di inception dopo fw init.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Bug Description
T-3948 (d20c996) fixed the deadlock on the inception schema gate for upgraded consumers: the gate now judges the post-edit file, and fw upgrade backfills target_blast_radius / voi_score. The fw init path was not covered: the greenfield seed for T-002 still ships without the two fields, so a freshly initialised project starts with an inception that fails the gate.
Evidence, 1.8.6 (1ea10441f):
lib/seeds/tasks/greenfield/T-002-define-project-goals.md:workflow_type: inception, notarget_blast_radius, novoi_score. Last touched by 89bed4f (T-3636), before T-3948.lib/init.shcopies the seed (line 714) and never callslib/inception_schema_backfill.py; onlylib/upgrade.shdoes (line 1741).tests/unit/t3948_inception_schema_upgrade.batscovers "fw upgrade of an initialised consumer backfills its old inception"; none of the eight tests in that file covers a project that is initialised and never upgraded (I did not search the other test files).
Steps to Reproduce
fw inita greenfield project with providerclaude.- Open a Claude Code session in it and run
fw work-on T-002. - Ask the agent to tick an Agent AC or to fill in
## Recommendationin the T-002 task file.
Observed end to end on 1.8.3. On 1.8.6 this is read from the source; I have not run a fresh fw init.
Expected Behavior
fw inita greenfield project with providerclaude.- Open a Claude Code session in it and run
fw work-on T-002. - Ask the agent to tick an Agent AC or to fill in
## Recommendationin the T-002 task file.
Observed end to end on 1.8.3. On 1.8.6 this is read from the source; I have not run a fresh fw init.
Actual Behavior
fw inita greenfield project with providerclaude.- Open a Claude Code session in it and run
fw work-on T-002. - Ask the agent to tick an Agent AC or to fill in
## Recommendationin the T-002 task file.
Observed end to end on 1.8.3. On 1.8.6 this is read from the source; I have not run a fresh fw init.
fw doctor output
AI Agent
Claude Code
Operating System
Linux
Additional Context
Version: 1.8.6 (1ea10441f), vendored consumer. First seen on 1.8.3 (542623a3).
Suggestions:
- Add the two fields to the greenfield T-002 seed, or run the T-3948 backfill at the end of
fw init. - Add a check (test or
fw doctor) that every seeded task passes the gates that apply to itsworkflow_type. T-2862 and T-3948 were both deadlocks on this same seeded task. - In the block message, say that
FW_ALLOW_INCEPTION_SCHEMA_DRIFT=1is an operator action when the blocked call is a Write/Edit tool call: the agent cannot set an environment variable for a hook.
- Lingua principale
- Shell
- Stelle
- 16
- Fork
- 6
- Merge medio
- 6h 24m
- PR unite (30g)
- 5
Preparare l'ambiente
- Include un Dockerfile o un file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework
-
area:cli bug severity:low status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#100 · 5 commenti ·
-
area:cli bug severity:medium status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#97 · 5 commenti ·
-
area:context bug severity:low status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#96 · 5 commenti ·
-
area:docs bug severity:medium status:in-progress triaged
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#95 · 4 commenti ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
Tutte le issue di DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 70/100
-
Renovate config partially updates OVMS URLForse già presa @farshidtz l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
-
Regression: IME preedit still shown in plaintext on lock/polkit — #13002 fix is not in 4.0.6Forse già presa @AnPod l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
fullsend-ai/agents#1833 · 2 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
gnosis/gnosis_vpn#661 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno