[Bug]: Greenfield T-002 seed still fails the inception schema gate after T-3948 (fw init path not covered)
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 72/100
Línea de trabajo
Lee lib/seeds/tasks/greenfield/T-002-define-project-goals.md, lib/init.sh alrededor de la línea 714 y lib/inception_schema_backfill.py; compara la ruta de seed e init con la llamada de backfill en lib/upgrade.sh alrededor de la línea 1741. Añade cobertura para un proyecto recién inicializado en las pruebas Bats pertinentes y, después, verifica que T-002 supere su puerta de esquema de inception tras fw init.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Bug Description
T-3948 (d20c996) fixed the deadlock on the inception schema gate for upgraded consumers: the gate now judges the post-edit file, and fw upgrade backfills target_blast_radius / voi_score. The fw init path was not covered: the greenfield seed for T-002 still ships without the two fields, so a freshly initialised project starts with an inception that fails the gate.
Evidence, 1.8.6 (1ea10441f):
lib/seeds/tasks/greenfield/T-002-define-project-goals.md:workflow_type: inception, notarget_blast_radius, novoi_score. Last touched by 89bed4f (T-3636), before T-3948.lib/init.shcopies the seed (line 714) and never callslib/inception_schema_backfill.py; onlylib/upgrade.shdoes (line 1741).tests/unit/t3948_inception_schema_upgrade.batscovers "fw upgrade of an initialised consumer backfills its old inception"; none of the eight tests in that file covers a project that is initialised and never upgraded (I did not search the other test files).
Steps to Reproduce
fw inita greenfield project with providerclaude.- Open a Claude Code session in it and run
fw work-on T-002. - Ask the agent to tick an Agent AC or to fill in
## Recommendationin the T-002 task file.
Observed end to end on 1.8.3. On 1.8.6 this is read from the source; I have not run a fresh fw init.
Expected Behavior
fw inita greenfield project with providerclaude.- Open a Claude Code session in it and run
fw work-on T-002. - Ask the agent to tick an Agent AC or to fill in
## Recommendationin the T-002 task file.
Observed end to end on 1.8.3. On 1.8.6 this is read from the source; I have not run a fresh fw init.
Actual Behavior
fw inita greenfield project with providerclaude.- Open a Claude Code session in it and run
fw work-on T-002. - Ask the agent to tick an Agent AC or to fill in
## Recommendationin the T-002 task file.
Observed end to end on 1.8.3. On 1.8.6 this is read from the source; I have not run a fresh fw init.
fw doctor output
AI Agent
Claude Code
Operating System
Linux
Additional Context
Version: 1.8.6 (1ea10441f), vendored consumer. First seen on 1.8.3 (542623a3).
Suggestions:
- Add the two fields to the greenfield T-002 seed, or run the T-3948 backfill at the end of
fw init. - Add a check (test or
fw doctor) that every seeded task passes the gates that apply to itsworkflow_type. T-2862 and T-3948 were both deadlocks on this same seeded task. - In the block message, say that
FW_ALLOW_INCEPTION_SCHEMA_DRIFT=1is an operator action when the blocked call is a Write/Edit tool call: the agent cannot set an environment variable for a hook.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Shell
- Estrellas
- 16
- Forks
- 6
- Merge medio
- 6 h 24 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 5
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework
-
area:cli bug severity:low status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#100 · 5 comentarios ·
-
area:cli bug severity:medium status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#97 · 5 comentarios ·
-
area:context bug severity:low status:fixed-on-bleeding-edge triaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#96 · 5 comentarios ·
-
area:docs bug severity:medium status:in-progress triaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#95 · 4 comentarios ·
-
area:watchtower bug severity:low status:released triaged
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework#94 · 4 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de DimitriGeelen/agentic-engineering-framework
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
koalaman/shellcheck#3593 ·
-
Link Checker ReportAbiertoautomated issue report
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
a2aproject/A2A#2381 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
e2e-failure ready-to-code
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
redhat-developer/rhdh-plugin-export-overlays#4485 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
DSH /pwf-status reports no plan when PLAN_ID is requiredPosiblemente ocupada @kuei51307-hub la tomó hoy. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
OthmanAdi/planning-with-files#332 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día