feat(einsatzdaten): the address model cannot hold a house number, PLZ or Ort
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 42/100
Direzione di ricerca
Start with Incident.cs, Formatting.Address, and the existing migration chain in Sqlite/Migrations.cs (currently v21); then trace the fields through IncidentDataDialogView.axaml, IncidentHeaderSection.cs, and the sync snapshot. The issue leaves open whether District remains distinct from Place, so settle that design question before changing the model. Done means optional address fields are migrated and carried through the form, formatting, PDF header, and sync.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
From a portability review of main (ecb341b).
The gap
An incident's location is two free-text fields and nothing else:
// src/LageBuch.Domain/Incident.cs
public string? Street { get; private set; } // :40
public string? District { get; private set; } // :42
Columns incident_meta.street and incident_meta.district; Formatting.Address joins them with ", "; the placeholders are z. B. Hauptstr. 12 and z. B. Puch (IncidentDataDialogView.axaml:31,34). There is no house-number field (it goes in Street by convention), no PLZ, no Ort, no country.
Why it is a limit even in Bavaria
For a Feuerwehr documenting incidents inside its own Gemeinde this is exactly right and adding fields would be noise. It stops working in two cases that are not unusual:
- Überörtliche Hilfe. The Ort is the discriminating field and there is nowhere to put it. Today it goes in
District, which then means something different from one incident to the next. - A Landkreis-level ELW. Same problem, permanently.
The PDF header (IncidentHeaderSection.cs:53) and the Einsatzbericht that reaches the Kreisbrandinspektion inherit the ambiguity.
Outside Germany it is a harder stop: UK postcodes and US city/state/ZIP have nowhere to go at all.
Proposal
Add HouseNumber, PostalCode and Place to incident_meta, keep Street and District, and keep every field optional so the current one-Gemeinde workflow stays a two-field form. Formatting.Address grows a canonical join that drops the empties.
.fwincident has a real migration chain (Sqlite/Migrations.cs, currently at v21) so this is a routine additive migration — no data loss, old files open with the new fields null.
Fields follow through to IncidentDataDialogView, IncidentHeaderSection, and the sync snapshot.
Open question
Whether District (Ortsteil) survives as its own field once Place exists, or whether the two collapse. I lean towards keeping both — an Ortsteil is genuinely how a rural incident gets located, and it is not a city district.
- Lingua principale
- C#
- Stelle
- 1
- Fork
- 3
- Merge medio
- 4h 49m
- PR unite (30g)
- 177
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Ha un modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di CodeForFire/lagebuch
-
Stammdaten: in the Checkliste editor the PFLICHT header is not aligned with its columnForse già presa @Saad-elnagar l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertabug ux
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
CodeForFire/lagebuch#714 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Stammdaten: on a phone the Fahrzeuge editor squeezes Wache and Funkrufname to nothingForse già presa @Saad-elnagar l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. Apertabug ux
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 75/100
CodeForFire/lagebuch#713 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
enhancement
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
CodeForFire/lagebuch#405 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
CodeForFire/lagebuch#349 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation good first issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
CodeForFire/lagebuch#348 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di CodeForFire/lagebuch
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
-
[Bug]: Revit selector reads process ids 2000-2099 as years (flaky AgentClientTests.AYearOrAProcessIdSelectsTheHost)Forse già presa @Wurschdhaud l’ha presa oggi. Aperta
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 83/100
pyrevitlabs/pyRevit#3817 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
bug effort:S P2
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
nightscout/nocturne#2449 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Python: Rejected system messages leave AgentChat permanently activeForse già presa @Michael-Duck l’ha presa oggi. Apertapython triage
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
microsoft/semantic-kernel#14638 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 3 giorni
-
audit:1 bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
NethermindEth/dotnet-libp2p#395 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno