A node type cannot be defined outside the kernel assembly: five of Entity's abstract members are internal
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- csharp
- Ambito
- backend-api-design
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia leggendo le cinque definizioni dei membri indicate in Core/Entity/Entity.Definition.cs, Functions/TreeAnalyzer/Sort.Definition.cs, Functions/Evaluation/Evaluation.Definition.cs, Functions/Output/ToSympy.Definition.cs e Functions/Continuous/Solvers/InvertNode.Definition.cs, insieme a Docs/Contributing/Packaging.md e Docs/Contributing/Trimming.md. Esegui EveryNodeSurvivesEveryPipelineTest ed esamina il gate di trimming/AOT. Il lavoro è completo quando sono presenti un contratto documentato, un test della pipeline in un assembly separato e sono stati mantenuti i controlli di reflection e AOT.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
What is wrong
Entity is public abstract partial record, and its constructor is protected, which reads as an
invitation to derive from it. But a subclass in another assembly does not compile. Five of its
abstract members are internal or private protected, so an external type can never satisfy them:
| member | accessibility | where |
|---|---|---|
Priority |
internal abstract |
Core/Entity/Entity.Definition.cs:378 |
SortHashName(SortLevel) |
private protected abstract |
Functions/TreeAnalyzer/Sort.Definition.cs:19 |
IntrinsicCondition |
private protected abstract |
Functions/Evaluation/Evaluation.Definition.cs:72 |
ToSymPy() |
internal abstract |
Functions/Output/ToSympy.Definition.cs:13 |
InvertNode(Entity, Entity) |
private protected abstract |
Functions/Continuous/Solvers/InvertNode.Definition.cs:30 |
Deriving from Entity in a separate assembly fails with CS0534, naming each of those five among
the members it cannot implement. This is not a policy that could be relaxed by an
InternalsVisibleTo: a published extension package cannot be on that list.
Why it matters, and what is behind it
This is the concrete blocker under several roadmap items, and it is not the one they name.
#746 item 56 says the extensibility seam
is #338 — looking a type up so it can be
parsed from a string. That is the second half. The first half is being able to write the type at
all, and today you cannot. The same wall sits under item 53 (groups, rings and fields as
first-class, #440) and under the whole
tier-9 domain-package idea, which assumes a geometry or statistics pack can contribute node types.
It also means one thing the packaging decision cannot decide. Docs/Contributing/Packaging.md
(#746 item 78) works out which capabilities belong in the kernel and which ship separately, and its
answer for domain packages is blocked, not decided — because a package boundary is not what is
in the way here. Moving the LaTeX printer or the SymPy exporter out of the kernel runs into the same
five members from the other side: they are abstract members of Entity, so moving them means either
this contract becoming extensible or a visitor over all 68 node types.
Scope
This is a design decision before it is an implementation, and it should be argued before it is
built. The shape of the question:
- Which of the five are genuinely part of a node's public contract, and which are engine internals
that a visitor or a registry should own instead?ToSymPyandSortHashNamelook like the second
kind;PriorityandIntrinsicConditionlook like the first. - If a member becomes
publicorprotected, it becomes a compatibility surface — every future
change toSortLevel,Priorityor theInvertNodesignature is then breaking. That is the real
cost and it should be stated before the change, not discovered after. - Is the answer instead a sealed node hierarchy plus an explicit extension point — a node kind
that carries a name and an operation table — so that a domain package contributes data rather than
a subclass? That keepsEntityclosed, which is what makes exhaustive matching and the
EveryNodeSurvivesEveryPipelineTestreflection sweep work today. - Whatever is chosen must be trimming- and NativeAOT-safe: explicit registration, no runtime assembly
scanning. See #363,
#552 and
Docs/Contributing/Trimming.md.
Acceptance criteria
- A written decision in
Docs/Contributing/, saying what a node type outside the kernel may and may
not do, and which of the five members are part of the contract. - A test that compiles a node type from a separate assembly and puts it through the pipeline —
parse is not required, butToString,Latexize,InnerSimplified, substitution and structural
equality are. A test that only asserts the type exists proves nothing; this has to build. EveryNodeSurvivesEveryPipelineTeststill passes, and it is stated whether an external node is
in scope for it.- No new reflection on a hot path, and the trimming/AOT gate stays green.
Dependencies
Independent of everything currently open. It does not depend on
#338 — it is what #338 needs, not the
reverse. It is a prerequisite for #746 items 53 and 56 and for tier 9.
Found while measuring package boundaries for #746 item 78.
- Lingua principale
- C#
- Stelle
- 831
- Fork
- 79
- Merge medio
- 2h 22m
- PR unite (30g)
- 507
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di ASC-Community/AngouriMath
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 30/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1807 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 25/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1692 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 30/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1690 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 48/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1689 · 5 commenti ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 35/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1684 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di ASC-Community/AngouriMath
Issue simili
-
bug component/other
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 73/100
umbraco/Umbraco.AI#511 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
sev:L
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 72/100
Systemorph/MeshWeaver#6233 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Bug]:Apertabug needs response
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
Adyen/adyen-dotnet-api-library#1874 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 66/100
CommunityToolkit/Aspire#2231 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
BUG: `ExecutablePluginV2` is not set up correctly and FL uses `ExecutablePlugin` (v1) insteadApertabug
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 90/100
Flow-Launcher/Flow.Launcher#4697 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 4 giorni