A node type cannot be defined outside the kernel assembly: five of Entity's abstract members are internal
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- csharp
- Área
- backend-api-design
Línea de trabajo
Empieza leyendo las cinco definiciones de miembros nombradas en Core/Entity/Entity.Definition.cs, Functions/TreeAnalyzer/Sort.Definition.cs, Functions/Evaluation/Evaluation.Definition.cs, Functions/Output/ToSympy.Definition.cs y Functions/Continuous/Solvers/InvertNode.Definition.cs, junto con Docs/Contributing/Packaging.md y Docs/Contributing/Trimming.md. Ejecuta EveryNodeSurvivesEveryPipelineTest e inspecciona la compuerta de trimming/AOT. Se considera terminado cuando haya un contrato documentado, una prueba de pipeline en un ensamblado separado y se hayan conservado las comprobaciones de reflexión y AOT.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What is wrong
Entity is public abstract partial record, and its constructor is protected, which reads as an
invitation to derive from it. But a subclass in another assembly does not compile. Five of its
abstract members are internal or private protected, so an external type can never satisfy them:
| member | accessibility | where |
|---|---|---|
Priority |
internal abstract |
Core/Entity/Entity.Definition.cs:378 |
SortHashName(SortLevel) |
private protected abstract |
Functions/TreeAnalyzer/Sort.Definition.cs:19 |
IntrinsicCondition |
private protected abstract |
Functions/Evaluation/Evaluation.Definition.cs:72 |
ToSymPy() |
internal abstract |
Functions/Output/ToSympy.Definition.cs:13 |
InvertNode(Entity, Entity) |
private protected abstract |
Functions/Continuous/Solvers/InvertNode.Definition.cs:30 |
Deriving from Entity in a separate assembly fails with CS0534, naming each of those five among
the members it cannot implement. This is not a policy that could be relaxed by an
InternalsVisibleTo: a published extension package cannot be on that list.
Why it matters, and what is behind it
This is the concrete blocker under several roadmap items, and it is not the one they name.
#746 item 56 says the extensibility seam
is #338 — looking a type up so it can be
parsed from a string. That is the second half. The first half is being able to write the type at
all, and today you cannot. The same wall sits under item 53 (groups, rings and fields as
first-class, #440) and under the whole
tier-9 domain-package idea, which assumes a geometry or statistics pack can contribute node types.
It also means one thing the packaging decision cannot decide. Docs/Contributing/Packaging.md
(#746 item 78) works out which capabilities belong in the kernel and which ship separately, and its
answer for domain packages is blocked, not decided — because a package boundary is not what is
in the way here. Moving the LaTeX printer or the SymPy exporter out of the kernel runs into the same
five members from the other side: they are abstract members of Entity, so moving them means either
this contract becoming extensible or a visitor over all 68 node types.
Scope
This is a design decision before it is an implementation, and it should be argued before it is
built. The shape of the question:
- Which of the five are genuinely part of a node's public contract, and which are engine internals
that a visitor or a registry should own instead?ToSymPyandSortHashNamelook like the second
kind;PriorityandIntrinsicConditionlook like the first. - If a member becomes
publicorprotected, it becomes a compatibility surface — every future
change toSortLevel,Priorityor theInvertNodesignature is then breaking. That is the real
cost and it should be stated before the change, not discovered after. - Is the answer instead a sealed node hierarchy plus an explicit extension point — a node kind
that carries a name and an operation table — so that a domain package contributes data rather than
a subclass? That keepsEntityclosed, which is what makes exhaustive matching and the
EveryNodeSurvivesEveryPipelineTestreflection sweep work today. - Whatever is chosen must be trimming- and NativeAOT-safe: explicit registration, no runtime assembly
scanning. See #363,
#552 and
Docs/Contributing/Trimming.md.
Acceptance criteria
- A written decision in
Docs/Contributing/, saying what a node type outside the kernel may and may
not do, and which of the five members are part of the contract. - A test that compiles a node type from a separate assembly and puts it through the pipeline —
parse is not required, butToString,Latexize,InnerSimplified, substitution and structural
equality are. A test that only asserts the type exists proves nothing; this has to build. EveryNodeSurvivesEveryPipelineTeststill passes, and it is stated whether an external node is
in scope for it.- No new reflection on a hot path, and the trimming/AOT gate stays green.
Dependencies
Independent of everything currently open. It does not depend on
#338 — it is what #338 needs, not the
reverse. It is a prerequisite for #746 items 53 and 56 and for tier 9.
Found while measuring package boundaries for #746 item 78.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C#
- Estrellas
- 831
- Forks
- 79
- Merge medio
- 2 h 22 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 507
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de ASC-Community/AngouriMath
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1807 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1692 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 30/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1690 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1689 · 5 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
ASC-Community/AngouriMath#1684 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de ASC-Community/AngouriMath
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
microsoft/fluentui-blazor#5410 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Bug pulumi/pulumi
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
activescott/lessmsi#306 ·
-
Docs MSBuild
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
getsentry/sentry-dotnet#5691 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día