Synchronous Firestore call unbinds the caller thread's `contextvars` Context (breaks Flask request context) under gunicorn sync worker
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100
Research direction
Start by reproducing the synchronous get()/batch.commit() flow under Flask 2.3 and gunicorn sync workers, then inspect grpc/_channel.py around _run_channel_spin_thread, ForkManagedThread, and segregated_call. Compare the behavior with grpc/grpc#40123 and the Firestore client call sites in google/cloud/firestore_v1; done means identifying whether the context change is gRPC-wide or Firestore-specific and documenting a supported fix or workaround.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Determine this is the right repository
- I determined this is the correct repository in which to report this bug.
Summary of the issue
A synchronous Firestore call (gRPC transport) made from inside a request-handling
thread switches/unbinds that thread's contextvars Context partway through. Any
framework that stores per-request state in a ContextVar (Flask 2.3+ keeps its request
context in _cv_request) sees that state disappear on the same thread immediately
after the Firestore call. In our Flask app this surfaces as:
RuntimeError: Working outside of request context
raised during response finalization — a 500 to the client, even though the view code
completed successfully.
Firebase support directed us here, and pointed to a similar regression in the gRPC repo:
grpc/grpc#40123 ("contextvar loss when using thread pool executors in newer gRPC
versions"). Filing so the Cloud Firestore team can determine whether this is global gRPC
behavior or specific to the Firestore client's transport.
Environment
- Python: 3.9
- google-cloud-firestore: 2.18.0
- firebase-admin: 6.5.0 (thin wrapper over the client above)
- google-api-core: 2.19.2
- grpcio / grpcio-status: 1.66.1
- Transport: default (gRPC)
- Web stack: Flask 2.3.0 / Werkzeug 3.0.3, served by gunicorn sync worker
(one request at a time per worker process; stable OS thread) - Client init: module-level
firestore.client()(channel created lazily on first RPC)
Observed behavior
We instrumented contextvars.copy_context and logged has_request_context() (hrc)
with a full stack at each call. Within a single request, on the same OS thread:
(A) First Firestore call — hrc is True (context healthy). Fires at channel creation:
grpc/_channel.py:1761 _run_channel_spin_thread -> cygrpc.ForkManagedThread(target=channel_spin)
grpc/_channel.py:1821 create -> _run_channel_spin_thread(state)
grpc/_channel.py:1414 __call__ -> self._managed_call(...)
google/api_core/grpc_helpers.py:164 error_remapped_callable
google/api_core/timeout.py / retry_unary.py / gapic_v1/method.py
google/cloud/firestore_v1/services/firestore/client.py:1154 batch_get_documents
google/cloud/firestore_v1/document.py:402 get() # <- our doc_ref.get()
... application view ... gunicorn sync worker.handle_request
[hrc=True]
(B) A later Firestore call in the SAME request — hrc is now False (context gone):
grpc/_channel.py:1146 _blocking -> self._channel.segregated_call(...)
grpc/_channel.py:1178 __call__ -> self._blocking(...)
google/api_core/grpc_helpers.py:76 error_remapped_callable
google/api_core/timeout.py / retry_unary.py / gapic_v1/method.py
google/cloud/firestore_v1/services/firestore/client.py:1372 commit
google/cloud/firestore_v1/batch.py:59 commit() # <- our batch.commit()
... same application/gunicorn stack ...
[hrc=False]
Between (A) and (B) our code runs only in-process work (SQLAlchemy queries + a list
comprehension) — nothing that touches contextvars, spawns threads, or uses
asyncio/greenlets. The only machinery that manipulates context between the two points
is the Firestore/gRPC transport (_run_channel_spin_thread / cygrpc.ForkManagedThread
at channel creation, and segregated_call on subsequent RPCs).
Expected vs actual
- Expected: a synchronous Firestore RPC leaves the calling thread's
contextvars
Context unchanged. - Actual: after the RPC, the calling thread is running in a different Context; any
ContextVarset before the call (e.g. Flask's_cv_request) reads as unset.
Reproduction
Flask 2.3 app served by gunicorn sync worker. In a view: log has_request_context(),
do a synchronous Firestore read+write (doc_ref.get() then batch.commit()), log
has_request_context() again. On the first Firestore-touching request after a worker
starts (fresh gRPC channel), the second check is False and Flask raises "Working outside
of request context" during response finalization. Minimal standalone repro available on
request.
Questions
- Is the Firestore Python client (or the underlying gRPC transport) expected to alter
the calling thread'scontextvarsContext during a synchronous RPC? - Is this the same root cause as grpc/grpc#40123, or specific to the Firestore client's
ForkManagedThread/segregated_callusage? - Supported ways to avoid it:
- Pre-creating/warming the gRPC channel at process (post-fork) startup — does that
help, or doessegregated_calldisturb context on every RPC regardless of channel
age? - Using the REST transport (
transport="rest") — is that a supported path to avoid
the gRPC thread/context machinery entirely? - A known-good
grpcioversion to pin below the regression, if this is version-specific?
- Pre-creating/warming the gRPC channel at process (post-fork) startup — does that
Current workaround
We run all Firestore calls on a short-lived daemon thread so the context churn lands on
a disposable thread and the request thread's context stays intact. This resolves the
500s, but we would prefer a supported fix rather than thread-isolating every call.
Impact
Intermittent 500s (correlated with the first Firestore call per worker / gRPC channel
creation) on any endpoint that makes a synchronous Firestore call, in production.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 5.4k
- Forks
- 1.8k
- Avg merge
- 2d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 173
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- Has a pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from googleapis/google-cloud-python
-
firestore: field path with a quoted name ending in a backslash is misparsedPossibly taken @sebxt claimed this 25 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18771 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
api: spanner type: feature request
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18584 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
auth: `impersonated_credentials` loses `subject` on copy, so `with_scopes()` and `with_quota_project()` turn off domain wide delegationPossibly taken @Om-singhaI claimed this 55 days ago. Openauth priority: p2 type: bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18428 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
A client called `run_in_transaction` be stuck if Spanner is downPossibly taken @founderinaction claimed this 7 days ago. Openpriority: p2 type: bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18375 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
ci: enable --strict flag in presubmit twine_checkMay be free again @ohmayr claimed this 44 days ago, and no pull request is open. Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 76/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18339 · 1 comment · 1 assignee ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in googleapis/google-cloud-python
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
cpp-best-practices/project_validator#267 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Project-N-E-K-O/N.E.K.O#3725 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
[Bug] Sending a Telegram message chain twice duplicates mentionsPossibly taken @123XieC claimed this today. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
AstrBotDevs/AstrBot#11125 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
backend bug priority: high
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
nooriegarg/ContribIQ#73 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
bug p3 security
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day