Synchronous Firestore call unbinds the caller thread's `contextvars` Context (breaks Flask request context) under gunicorn sync worker
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 45/100
Piste de recherche
Commencez par reproduire le flux synchrone get()/batch.commit() avec Flask 2.3 et gunicorn sync workers, puis examinez grpc/_channel.py autour de _run_channel_spin_thread, ForkManagedThread et segregated_call. Comparez le comportement avec grpc/grpc#40123 et les sites d’appel du client Firestore dans google/cloud/firestore_v1 ; le travail est terminé lorsqu’il est établi si le changement de contexte concerne l’ensemble de gRPC ou est spécifique à Firestore, et qu’un correctif ou une solution de contournement pris en charge est documenté.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
Determine this is the right repository
- I determined this is the correct repository in which to report this bug.
Summary of the issue
A synchronous Firestore call (gRPC transport) made from inside a request-handling
thread switches/unbinds that thread's contextvars Context partway through. Any
framework that stores per-request state in a ContextVar (Flask 2.3+ keeps its request
context in _cv_request) sees that state disappear on the same thread immediately
after the Firestore call. In our Flask app this surfaces as:
RuntimeError: Working outside of request context
raised during response finalization — a 500 to the client, even though the view code
completed successfully.
Firebase support directed us here, and pointed to a similar regression in the gRPC repo:
grpc/grpc#40123 ("contextvar loss when using thread pool executors in newer gRPC
versions"). Filing so the Cloud Firestore team can determine whether this is global gRPC
behavior or specific to the Firestore client's transport.
Environment
- Python: 3.9
- google-cloud-firestore: 2.18.0
- firebase-admin: 6.5.0 (thin wrapper over the client above)
- google-api-core: 2.19.2
- grpcio / grpcio-status: 1.66.1
- Transport: default (gRPC)
- Web stack: Flask 2.3.0 / Werkzeug 3.0.3, served by gunicorn sync worker
(one request at a time per worker process; stable OS thread) - Client init: module-level
firestore.client()(channel created lazily on first RPC)
Observed behavior
We instrumented contextvars.copy_context and logged has_request_context() (hrc)
with a full stack at each call. Within a single request, on the same OS thread:
(A) First Firestore call — hrc is True (context healthy). Fires at channel creation:
grpc/_channel.py:1761 _run_channel_spin_thread -> cygrpc.ForkManagedThread(target=channel_spin)
grpc/_channel.py:1821 create -> _run_channel_spin_thread(state)
grpc/_channel.py:1414 __call__ -> self._managed_call(...)
google/api_core/grpc_helpers.py:164 error_remapped_callable
google/api_core/timeout.py / retry_unary.py / gapic_v1/method.py
google/cloud/firestore_v1/services/firestore/client.py:1154 batch_get_documents
google/cloud/firestore_v1/document.py:402 get() # <- our doc_ref.get()
... application view ... gunicorn sync worker.handle_request
[hrc=True]
(B) A later Firestore call in the SAME request — hrc is now False (context gone):
grpc/_channel.py:1146 _blocking -> self._channel.segregated_call(...)
grpc/_channel.py:1178 __call__ -> self._blocking(...)
google/api_core/grpc_helpers.py:76 error_remapped_callable
google/api_core/timeout.py / retry_unary.py / gapic_v1/method.py
google/cloud/firestore_v1/services/firestore/client.py:1372 commit
google/cloud/firestore_v1/batch.py:59 commit() # <- our batch.commit()
... same application/gunicorn stack ...
[hrc=False]
Between (A) and (B) our code runs only in-process work (SQLAlchemy queries + a list
comprehension) — nothing that touches contextvars, spawns threads, or uses
asyncio/greenlets. The only machinery that manipulates context between the two points
is the Firestore/gRPC transport (_run_channel_spin_thread / cygrpc.ForkManagedThread
at channel creation, and segregated_call on subsequent RPCs).
Expected vs actual
- Expected: a synchronous Firestore RPC leaves the calling thread's
contextvars
Context unchanged. - Actual: after the RPC, the calling thread is running in a different Context; any
ContextVarset before the call (e.g. Flask's_cv_request) reads as unset.
Reproduction
Flask 2.3 app served by gunicorn sync worker. In a view: log has_request_context(),
do a synchronous Firestore read+write (doc_ref.get() then batch.commit()), log
has_request_context() again. On the first Firestore-touching request after a worker
starts (fresh gRPC channel), the second check is False and Flask raises "Working outside
of request context" during response finalization. Minimal standalone repro available on
request.
Questions
- Is the Firestore Python client (or the underlying gRPC transport) expected to alter
the calling thread'scontextvarsContext during a synchronous RPC? - Is this the same root cause as grpc/grpc#40123, or specific to the Firestore client's
ForkManagedThread/segregated_callusage? - Supported ways to avoid it:
- Pre-creating/warming the gRPC channel at process (post-fork) startup — does that
help, or doessegregated_calldisturb context on every RPC regardless of channel
age? - Using the REST transport (
transport="rest") — is that a supported path to avoid
the gRPC thread/context machinery entirely? - A known-good
grpcioversion to pin below the regression, if this is version-specific?
- Pre-creating/warming the gRPC channel at process (post-fork) startup — does that
Current workaround
We run all Firestore calls on a short-lived daemon thread so the context churn lands on
a disposable thread and the request thread's context stays intact. This resolves the
500s, but we would prefer a supported fix rather than thread-isolating every call.
Impact
Intermittent 500s (correlated with the first Firestore call per worker / gRPC channel
creation) on any endpoint that makes a synchronous Firestore call, in production.
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 5.4k
- Forks
- 1.8k
- Merge moyen
- 2 j 7 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 173
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Propose un modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de googleapis/google-cloud-python
-
firestore: field path with a quoted name ending in a backslash is misparsedPeut-être pris @sebxt l’a pris il y a 25 jours. Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18771 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
api: spanner type: feature request
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18584 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
auth: `impersonated_credentials` loses `subject` on copy, so `with_scopes()` and `with_quota_project()` turn off domain wide delegationPeut-être pris @Om-singhaI l’a pris il y a 55 jours. Ouverteauth priority: p2 type: bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 88/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18428 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
A client called `run_in_transaction` be stuck if Spanner is downPeut-être pris @founderinaction l’a pris il y a 7 jours. Ouvertepriority: p2 type: bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18375 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
ci: enable --strict flag in presubmit twine_checkPeut-être à nouveau libre @ohmayr l’a pris il y a 44 jours, et aucune pull request n’est ouverte. Ouverte
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 76/100
googleapis/google-cloud-python#18339 · 1 commentaire · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de googleapis/google-cloud-python
Issues similaires
-
plot_graph crashes when a mesh node has no m2m edgePeut-être pris @tygvi l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
mllam/neural-lam#883 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours
-
enhancement possible-duplicate
Difficulté 1/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
AOSSIE-Org/PictoPy#1715 · 2 commentaires ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 6 jours
-
SQLite connector omits generated columns from the catalog, and drops relationships sourced on themOuverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
NVIDIA/auto-ontology#511 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
ethereum/execution-specs#3996 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 62/100
cpp-best-practices/project_validator#267 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour