AgentTool runs the wrapped agent with the default RunConfig instead of the caller's
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 3/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 72/100
- Type d'issue
- Bug
- Clarté
- Clairement spécifiée
- Activité
- Active
- Stack technique
- java
- Domaine
- backend-api-design, testing-qa
Piste de recherche
Start at AgentTool.runAsync and trace how the caller's RunConfig reaches the nested Runner. Use AgentToolTest, including call_propagatesCallerRunConfig, and the TestLlm utilities in core/src/test/java/com/google/adk/testing. Done means the wrapped agent receives the caller's limits, tool mode, and metadata, uses the expected streaming mode, and the tests stop the nested run at the configured limit.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
🔴 Required Information
Describe the Bug:
AgentTool.runAsync starts the wrapped agent with Runner.runAsync(userId, sessionId, content), the overload that uses RunConfig.builder().build(). So an agent used as a tool always runs with the RunConfig defaults (maxLlmCalls 500, ToolExecutionMode.NONE, empty customMetadata), whatever RunConfig the caller passed to Runner.runAsync. A maxLlmCalls limit set to bound one request does not bound the LLM calls of an agent behind an AgentTool, and toolExecutionMode(SEQUENTIAL) does not reach that agent's tool calls.
Steps to Reproduce:
- Check out
main(4092a1f). - Give a root
LlmAgentanAgentToolthat wraps a secondLlmAgentwhose model keeps calling one of its tools. - Run the root agent with
runner.runAsync(userId, sessionId, message, RunConfig.builder().maxLlmCalls(5).build()).
Expected Behavior:
The wrapped agent runs under the caller's RunConfig, so the run stops once the wrapped agent has made 5 LLM calls. adk-python does this since google/adk-python@983c280 ("fix(tools): run an agent tool under the caller's RunConfig"), and runs the wrapped agent in StreamingMode.NONE since google/adk-python@0d5752b, because only the last event of the nested run becomes the tool result.
Observed Behavior:
The wrapped agent gets the default RunConfig. With test doubles for both models (code below), the root agent made 1 LLM call and the wrapped agent 500 before the run failed with LlmCallsLimitExceededException: Max number of llm calls limit of 500 exceeded.
(When the wrapped agent's test model answers on the calling thread instead, main fails earlier with a StackOverflowError, after about 270–290 nested calls in my runs. With the fix, both variants stop after 5.)
Environment Details:
- ADK Library Version (see maven dependency):
mainat4092a1f; the v1.10.1 release has the sameAgentToolcode.AgentToolhas called the three-argumentrunAsyncsince it was added in 0.1.0. - OS: Windows 11 (not OS-specific)
- TS Version (tsc --version): N/A (Java: Microsoft OpenJDK 17.0.19; Maven 4.0.0-rc-3 via
mvnw)
Model Information:
- Which model is being used: N/A (reproduced with
TestLlm; the call path does not depend on the model)
🟡 Optional Information
Regression:
No.
Logs:
What the wrapped agent receives, from the unit test in the fix (it wraps a test agent that records its InvocationContext; the caller's RunConfig has toolExecutionMode(SEQUENTIAL), maxLlmCalls(7) and customMetadata {tier=x}), run against main:
[ERROR] AgentToolTest.call_propagatesCallerRunConfig:896 value of: runConfig()
expected: …, toolExecutionMode=SEQUENTIAL, outputAudioTranscription=null, inputAudioTranscription=null, maxLlmCalls=7, autoCreateSession=false, groupFunctionResponsesInHistoryOverride=Optional.empty, customMetadata={tier=x}}
but was : …, toolExecutionMode=NONE, outputAudioTranscription=null, inputAudioTranscription=null, maxLlmCalls=500, autoCreateSession=false, groupFunctionResponsesInHistoryOverride=Optional.empty, customMetadata={}}
Additional Context:
The nested Runner creates its own InvocationContext, so passing the caller's RunConfig bounds the wrapped agent's LLM calls separately from the caller's; that is also how adk-python counts them. I have a fix with unit tests ready and will link the PR here.
Minimal Reproduction Code:
// The wrapped agent's model always asks for echo_tool again. It answers on an RxJava IO thread
// so that the loop on main reaches the LLM-call limit instead of overflowing the stack first.
TestLlm workerLlm =
createTestLlm(
() ->
Flowable.just(
createFunctionCallLlmResponse(
"worker-call", "echo_tool", ImmutableMap.of("arg", "x")))
.subscribeOn(Schedulers.io()));
LlmAgent worker =
LlmAgent.builder()
.name("worker")
.description("Keeps calling echo_tool.")
.model(workerLlm)
.tools(new EchoTool())
.build();
TestLlm rootLlm =
createTestLlm(
createFunctionCallLlmResponse("root-call", "worker", ImmutableMap.of("request", "go")),
createTextLlmResponse("done"));
LlmAgent root =
LlmAgent.builder().name("root").model(rootLlm).tools(AgentTool.create(worker)).build();
InMemoryRunner runner = new InMemoryRunner(root);
Session session = runner.sessionService().createSession(runner.appName(), "user").blockingGet();
runner
.runAsync(
"user",
session.id(),
Content.fromParts(Part.fromText("hi")),
RunConfig.builder().maxLlmCalls(5).build())
.toList()
.blockingGet();
// Fails with "Max number of llm calls limit of 500 exceeded";
// workerLlm.getRequests().size() is 500, not 5.
(createTestLlm, createFunctionCallLlmResponse, createTextLlmResponse and the nested EchoTool class are in TestUtils, next to TestLlm in core/src/test/java/com/google/adk/testing; Schedulers is io.reactivex.rxjava3.schedulers.Schedulers.)
How often has this issue occurred?:
- Always (100%)
- Langage dominant
- Java
- Étoiles
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 421
- Merge moyen
- 3 j 14 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 31
Préparer son environnement
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de google/adk-java
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 68/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Approved tool call re-runs on every later user turn if it never got a function responsePeut-être pris @hemasekhar-p l’a pris il y a 3 jours. Ouverteneeds review
google/adk-java#1556 · 1 commentaire · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
LocalSkillSource.listResources returns backslash-separated paths on WindowsPeut-être pris @hemasekhar-p l’a pris il y a 3 jours. Ouverteneeds review
google/adk-java#1541 · 1 commentaire · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Context caching (ContextCacheConfig) is a silent no-op: config is plumbed to InvocationContext but never readPeut-être pris @hemasekhar-p l’a pris il y a 5 jours. Ouverteneeds review
Difficulté 5/5 Plus d'une semaine Accessibilité débutants 35/100
google/adk-java#1530 · 1 commentaire · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
MCP toolset: in-model built-ins (e.g. google_search) can be shadowed by a server tool; a server tool named set_model_response aborts the runPeut-être pris @hemasekhar-p l’a pris il y a 11 jours. Ouverteneeds review
google/adk-java#1513 · 2 commentaires · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de google/adk-java
Issues similaires
-
P2 testing
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 90/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area/core kind/bug status/triage team/core-shared
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 88/100
checkstyle/checkstyle#21755 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
spring-projects/spring-integration#11495 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 84/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour