[feature request] PostgreSQL: FOR NO KEY UPDATE / FOR KEY SHARE, PREPARE TRANSACTION family and DO blocks have no AST production

Ouverte
#2,914 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Accessibilité débutants
35/100
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Clarté
Clairement spécifiée
Activité
Active
Stack technique
postgresql, rust

Piste de recherche

Start with src/ast/mod.rs and the PostgreSQL parser under src/parser/**; compare the existing FOR UPDATE / FOR SHARE locking clause and PREPARE statement productions. Add AST support and parsing for the missing locking strengths, prepared transaction statements, and DO blocks, then verify they produce matchable AST nodes with PostgreSqlDialect.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

PostgreSQL

Summary

sqlparser-rs 0.64.0 parses SELECT ... FOR UPDATE / FOR SHARE, but has no production for the other two PostgreSQL row-lock strengths, and no production for any PostgreSQL two-phase-commit statement or the anonymous DO block. These are the four surfaces PostgreSQL's own regression/isolation suites exercise and they cannot be reached through the AST at all.

Environment

  • sqlparser 0.64.0 (crate source, src/ast/mod.rs, src/parser/**)
  • PostgreSQL dialect (PostgreSqlDialect)
  • Consumer: a PostgreSQL-wire-compatible engine driving REL_16_4 pg_regress + isolation suites against sqlparser's AST

What is missing

PostgreSQL statement Expected Actual (0.64.0)
SELECT ... FOR NO KEY UPDATE a locking-clause AST node no production; FOR UPDATE and FOR SHARE only
SELECT ... FOR KEY SHARE a locking-clause AST node no production
PREPARE TRANSACTION 'gid' a statement node no production
COMMIT PREPARED 'gid' / ROLLBACK PREPARED 'gid' statement nodes no production
DO $$ ... $$ (anonymous code block) a statement node no Statement::Do variant

Evidence (0.64.0 crate source)

  • for no key update / for key share: 0 matches anywhere under src/ (case-insensitive, whitespace-tolerant).
  • PREPARE TRANSACTION: 0 matches anywhere under src/.
  • pub enum Statement has 151 variants; the only matches for the interesting prefixes are Prepare (the SQL PREPARE name AS ... statement), Lock, LockTables (MySQL) — there is no Do and no prepared-transaction variant.

Expected behaviour

Parsing the statements above with PostgreSqlDialect yields a statement/locking-clause node the consumer can match on, the same way SELECT ... FOR UPDATE already does.

Actual behaviour

The parser rejects them, so a downstream engine cannot represent the feature through the AST and is forced either to pre-scan the SQL text (which is what we want to avoid) or to leave the feature unimplemented.

Why it matters here

pg_regress's lock, select and transactions files and the isolation suite's prepared-transactions*, lock-committed-*, nowait-*, skip-locked-* specs all start with these statements. Without an AST face, the consumer cannot answer them at all.

Langage dominant
Rust
Étoiles
3.5k
Forks
805
Merge moyen
2 j 3 h
PR mergées (30 j)
116

Préparer son environnement

  • Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
  • Propose un modèle de pull request
  • Aucun guide de contribution

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs

Toutes les issues de apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Rust

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.