[feature request] PostgreSQL: FOR NO KEY UPDATE / FOR KEY SHARE, PREPARE TRANSACTION family and DO blocks have no AST production

Abierto
#2,914 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bien especificado
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
postgresql, rust

Línea de trabajo

Start with src/ast/mod.rs and the PostgreSQL parser under src/parser/**; compare the existing FOR UPDATE / FOR SHARE locking clause and PREPARE statement productions. Add AST support and parsing for the missing locking strengths, prepared transaction statements, and DO blocks, then verify they produce matchable AST nodes with PostgreSqlDialect.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

PostgreSQL

Summary

sqlparser-rs 0.64.0 parses SELECT ... FOR UPDATE / FOR SHARE, but has no production for the other two PostgreSQL row-lock strengths, and no production for any PostgreSQL two-phase-commit statement or the anonymous DO block. These are the four surfaces PostgreSQL's own regression/isolation suites exercise and they cannot be reached through the AST at all.

Environment

  • sqlparser 0.64.0 (crate source, src/ast/mod.rs, src/parser/**)
  • PostgreSQL dialect (PostgreSqlDialect)
  • Consumer: a PostgreSQL-wire-compatible engine driving REL_16_4 pg_regress + isolation suites against sqlparser's AST

What is missing

PostgreSQL statement Expected Actual (0.64.0)
SELECT ... FOR NO KEY UPDATE a locking-clause AST node no production; FOR UPDATE and FOR SHARE only
SELECT ... FOR KEY SHARE a locking-clause AST node no production
PREPARE TRANSACTION 'gid' a statement node no production
COMMIT PREPARED 'gid' / ROLLBACK PREPARED 'gid' statement nodes no production
DO $$ ... $$ (anonymous code block) a statement node no Statement::Do variant

Evidence (0.64.0 crate source)

  • for no key update / for key share: 0 matches anywhere under src/ (case-insensitive, whitespace-tolerant).
  • PREPARE TRANSACTION: 0 matches anywhere under src/.
  • pub enum Statement has 151 variants; the only matches for the interesting prefixes are Prepare (the SQL PREPARE name AS ... statement), Lock, LockTables (MySQL) — there is no Do and no prepared-transaction variant.

Expected behaviour

Parsing the statements above with PostgreSqlDialect yields a statement/locking-clause node the consumer can match on, the same way SELECT ... FOR UPDATE already does.

Actual behaviour

The parser rejects them, so a downstream engine cannot represent the feature through the AST and is forced either to pre-scan the SQL text (which is what we want to avoid) or to leave the feature unimplemented.

Why it matters here

pg_regress's lock, select and transactions files and the isolation suite's prepared-transactions*, lock-committed-*, nowait-*, skip-locked-* specs all start with these statements. Without an AST face, the consumer cannot answer them at all.

Lenguaje dominante
Rust
Estrellas
3.5k
Forks
805
Merge medio
2 d 3 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
116

Preparar el entorno

  • Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
  • Tiene una plantilla de pull request
  • Sin guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs

Todos los issues de apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs

Issues similares

Más issues de Rust

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.