[UI Bug] MCP Registry search does not filter server descriptions
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 55/100
Línea de trabajo
Start by locating the MCP Registry UI search entry point and tracing which server fields it searches; the issue does not name files or tests. Review the search discussion in Issue #13 for relevant context, then add description matching alongside name matching with partial keyword support. Done when a query found only in a server description returns that server.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Description
The search functionality in the MCP Registry UI does not appear to search or filter MCP servers based on their descriptions.
Currently, users have difficulty discovering relevant MCP servers unless they already know the server name or an exact keyword associated with it.
Searching by functionality or use case should also return MCP servers whose descriptions contain the relevant terms.
Steps to Reproduce
- Open the MCP Registry UI.
- Enter a keyword or phrase related to an MCP server's functionality.
- Check whether servers with matching terms in their descriptions appear.
- Observe that relevant servers may not be returned when the search term exists only in the description.
Expected Behaviour
- Search should include MCP server names and descriptions.
- Matching keywords in descriptions should return relevant MCP servers.
- Search should support partial keyword matching.
- Users should be able to discover servers based on functionality and use cases, not just server names.
Actual Behaviour
The search does not appear to consider the description field, making it difficult to discover relevant MCP servers based on their capabilities.
Suggested Improvement
Extend the existing search functionality to include the description field alongside server names.
Consider supporting keyword-based matching across metadata fields to improve search relevance and discoverability as the registry grows.
Related Discussion
This issue is related to the earlier discussion in Issue #13, which also touches on registry search behaviour.
It would be useful to revisit this discussion when implementing the improvement.
Impact
Improving description-based search will:
- Make MCP discovery easier for developers and users.
- Improve visibility of MCP servers based on their actual capabilities.
- Reduce dependency on knowing exact server names.
- Improve the overall usability and discoverability of the MCP ecosystem.
Priority: Medium – Search usability and discoverability.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 7.4k
- Forks
- 1k
- Merge medio
- 17 h 57 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 68
Preparar el entorno
- Incluye un Dockerfile o un archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de modelcontextprotocol/registry
-
3 registry records that cannot resolve for any client, and a caution about single-pass dead countsAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1692 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
IsValidRemoteURL only blocks literal localhost/127.0.0.1 — misses [::1], 127.0.0.0/8, 0.0.0.0, and private/link-local addressesPosiblemente ocupada @amitvijapur la tomó hace 108 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1465 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1805 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 49/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1792 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 28/100
modelcontextprotocol/registry#1789 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de modelcontextprotocol/registry
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
adrianbrad/queue#92 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
agent-ready area:skills
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
jmbarzee/temporal-architect#444 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement needs:sonnet ready-for-agent
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día