Restore to previous state with copy-on-write
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- jupyter, python
- Área
- backend, operating-systems
Línea de trabajo
El issue no nombra archivos, pruebas ni puntos de entrada. Empieza investigando cómo el proceso del kernel de Jupyter podría usar el mecanismo copy-on-write de fork para los checkpoints, incluida la restauración del estado del kernel y del notebook; al estar terminado, esto proporcionaría un flujo de trabajo fiable de checkpoint y restauración sin volver a ejecutar las celdas anteriores.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Apologies if this isn't the right place for this kind of feature request.
As a Jupyter user, I would find it incredibly helpful if there was an "undo" for kernels. Frequently, I run something, only to realize it was the wrong thing and I want to go back one cell. If the bad cell had any destructive effect, this means I need to restart my kernel and run all the cells above again. If those cells took 3 hours to run, I need to wait 3 hours again. Even if I don't think the bad cell had any destructive effect, if I fix up the notebook mid-stream others (and myself) won't be 100% sure that the notebook would work with a simple "restart and run all."
I wish there were a command like "Kernel -> Save Checkpoint" and then the ability to restore back to checkpoints. In Jupyter, if this worked in tandem with the checkpointing of the notebook file itself, it could create a seamless experience: I create a checkpoint, make a mistake, restore both kernel and notebook to the checkpoint, fix the mistake and keep running, and I end up with exactly the notebook I would have had if I hadn't made the mistake in the first place. (On the Jupyter side I'd also like an option that automatically checkpointed after each cell, and one that forks off into a console instead of checkpointing the notebook file.)
Technically, it seems like this could be achieved through fork's copy-on-write mechanism. For many notebooks that don't have much volatile state that is rewritten multiple times, even checkpoints after every cell could have near-zero memory overhead -- they would just be forks of the kernel process at that point, using the same pages in memory as the active kernel process unless they are subsequently modified.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 734
- Forks
- 411
- Merge medio
- 1 d 2 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 9
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de ipython/ipykernel
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
-
ipython/ipykernel#1550 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción · 1 asignado ·
-
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
Todos los issues de ipython/ipykernel
Issues similares
-
Add: hunch Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
AbdelStark/awesome-typesafe#104 ·
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
DiamondLightSource/dodal#2211 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
openml/openml-python#1749 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
sipyourdrink-ltd/bernstein#6191 ·