[curriculum-eval] side-quest-01-02-environment-reference.md: active_learning — low activity density in a long glossary/reference page
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 84/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- markdown
- Área
- documentation
Línea de trabajo
Edita workshop/side-quest-01-02-environment-reference.md, empezando por la tabla “Environment and tool glossary” y la sección existente “Verify your tools are ready”. Añade las actividades de autocomprobación solicitadas después de cada grupo temático, mueve antes la comprobación gh --version / git --version y deja el checkpoint sin cambios. Ejecuta npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"; si termina correctamente, la página tiene más actividades intercaladas y supera la comprobación de lint de Markdown.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
File: workshop/side-quest-01-02-environment-reference.md
Overall Score: 4.9 / 10.0 (corpus mean: 6.1)
Flagged Dimensions:
| Dimension | Score | Benchmark | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| active_learning | 2.1 | ≥ activity density 3 (score 10) | -7.9 |
| cognitive_load | 6.3 | ≤ 800 words / ≤ 15 concepts (score 10) | -3.7 |
Note: the rubric also flags missing_checkpoint/checkpoint_quality: 0.0, but this is a confirmed tooling bug — the file contains a well-formed ## :white_check_mark: Checkpoint section with 7 specific checklist items. The rubric's CHECKPOINT_RE only matches a literal ✅ character, not the :white_check_mark: shortcode used throughout this workshop. That flag should be dismissed for scoring purposes (see the scorecard issue for the tooling fix).
Root Cause (≤ 2 sentences):
At 1,433 words with 17 new concepts and only 2 code blocks / 9 checklist items, this reference page has very low activity density (0.63 vs. the ≥3 ideal) because it is a long prose-and-table glossary with almost no hands-on interaction until the very end. The nine-item tool/environment table and eight paired screenshot sections are read-only content stretched across most of the page.
Evidence (quoted from the file):
Knowing which name maps to which role helps you follow workshop instructions without stopping to wonder what "the terminal" or "Codespaces" means in context.
| Term | What it means in this workshop | When you use it | Official documentation |
Learning Science Rationale:
Mayer's multimedia principle on generative activity (and the broader active-learning literature) shows that passive reading of reference tables and paired screenshots — without an interleaved retrieval or verification step — produces shallow, non-durable encoding. A 1,400-word glossary read start-to-finish, with the only "do this" action (gh --version / git --version) buried near the end, gives learners little opportunity to actively process the terms as they're introduced, increasing the risk that the glossary is skimmed rather than internalized.
Improvement Prompt (for an agent):
Edit workshop/side-quest-01-02-environment-reference.md to raise activity density. After each thematic cluster in the "Environment and tool glossary" table (development environments; workshop tools and model options), insert a short self-check activity such as a 2-3 item micro-quiz or "match the tool to its use" prompt (e.g., "Which tool would you use to compile a workflow file? Which tool would you use to view a compiled .lock.yml?") with an answer in a collapsible <details> block. Also move the "Verify your tools are ready" gh --version / git --version check earlier, right after the glossary table, instead of leaving it as the only interactive element near the end. Keep the existing checkpoint section unchanged. Run npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md" after editing.
Expected Score After Fix: 6.0 / 10.0
Generated by 🔬 Curriculum Quality Evaluator · copilot · auto · 74.5 AIC · ⌖ 11.9 AIC · ⊞ 9K · ◷
- expires on Sep 23, 2026, 3:48 AM UTC
- Lenguaje dominante
- JavaScript
- Estrellas
- 53
- Forks
- 35
- Merge medio
- 13 h 50 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 14
Preparar el entorno
Inicia el contenedor de desarrollo del proyecto en tu navegador, con tu propia cuenta de GitHub.
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Sin guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
-
[curriculum-eval] 04-github-actions-intro.md: cognitive_load — 28 new concepts in a 5-minute introAbiertocurriculum documentation quality
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4603 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
curriculum documentation quality
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4601 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
curriculum documentation quality
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4578 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
documentation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4577 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[guidelines] side-quest-21-01-sub-agent-syntax.md: checklist checkbox count exceeds 10-item limitAbiertodocumentation guidelines
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4409 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de githubnext/gh-aw-workshop
Issues similares
-
internal os specific
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
frostney/GocciaScript#1688 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
🐞 bug pending triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
CircuitVerse/CircuitVerse#8031 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 8 días
-
docs(stream-protocol): document messageMetatadata on start/finish and the message-metadata chunkPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abiertofactory-active task-identify-harness-labels-done task-identify-issue-type-done
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
vercel/ai#23375 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 7 días