[gRPC aio] Prior RPC error logs leak into later RPC breadcrumbs despite isolation_scope
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- grpc, python
- Área
- backend, observability
Línea de trabajo
Start with the gRPC aio server integration in sentry_sdk/integrations/grpc/aio/server.py, then trace how its isolation scope interacts with gRPC's post-handler error logging and LoggingIntegration breadcrumbs. Reproduce the two-call case described in the issue and inspect the second event's breadcrumbs. Done means RPC 2 contains its own breadcrumbs without inheriting RPC 1's error log, while gRPC still logs the exception normally.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
How do you use Sentry?
Self-hosted/on-premise. The reproducer captures events in memory and requires no Sentry server.
Version
sentry-sdk 2.68.1; grpcio 1.83.1; protobuf 7.36.1; Python 3.12.
Steps to Reproduce
Install grpcio==1.83.1, protobuf==7.36.1, and sentry-sdk==2.68.1. Save this as issue_repro.py and run python issue_repro.py. It starts a local gRPC server, makes two failing unary-unary calls, and captures Sentry events in memory. The localhost DSN is never contacted.
"""Reproduce cross-RPC breadcrumbs with no Sentry server or generated protobuf files."""
import asyncio
import logging
import grpc
import sentry_sdk
from sentry_sdk.integrations.grpc import GRPCIntegration
from sentry_sdk.integrations.logging import LoggingIntegration
from sentry_sdk.transport import Transport
class MemoryTransport(Transport):
def __init__(self, options):
super().__init__(options)
self.events = []
def capture_envelope(self, envelope):
event = envelope.get_event()
if event and any(
value.get('mechanism', {}).get('type') == 'grpc'
for value in event.get('exception', {}).get('values', [])
):
self.events.append(event)
class GrpcLogSignal(logging.Handler):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.arrived = asyncio.Event()
def emit(self, record):
if record.name == 'grpc._cython.cygrpc' and record.getMessage().startswith('Unexpected ['):
self.arrived.set()
async def fail(request, context):
sentry_sdk.add_breadcrumb(message=f'rpc:{request.decode()}')
raise RuntimeError(f'rpc:{request.decode()}')
async def main():
sink = MemoryTransport({'dsn': 'http://public@localhost/1'})
sentry_sdk.init(
dsn='http://public@localhost/1',
transport=sink,
default_integrations=False,
integrations=[
GRPCIntegration(),
LoggingIntegration(level=logging.INFO, event_level=logging.ERROR),
],
)
signal = GrpcLogSignal()
logger = logging.getLogger('grpc._cython.cygrpc')
logger.addHandler(signal)
server = grpc.aio.server()
server.add_generic_rpc_handlers((
grpc.method_handlers_generic_handler('repro.Service', {
'Fail': grpc.unary_unary_rpc_method_handler(
fail, request_deserializer=lambda data: data,
response_serializer=lambda data: data,
),
}),
))
port = server.add_insecure_port('127.0.0.1:0')
await server.start()
try:
async with grpc.aio.insecure_channel(f'127.0.0.1:{port}') as channel:
call = channel.unary_unary('/repro.Service/Fail')
for number in (1, 2):
signal.arrived.clear()
try:
await call(str(number).encode())
except grpc.aio.AioRpcError:
pass
await asyncio.wait_for(signal.arrived.wait(), 5)
event = sink.events[number - 1]
messages = [b['message'] for b in event.get('breadcrumbs', {}).get('values', [])]
print(f'RPC {number} event breadcrumbs: {messages}')
finally:
await server.stop(0)
logger.removeHandler(signal)
sentry_sdk.get_client().close()
second = [b['message'] for b in sink.events[1]['breadcrumbs']['values']]
assert any('Unexpected [RuntimeError]' in message for message in second)
print('Reproduced: second RPC inherited first RPC error log')
if __name__ == '__main__':
asyncio.run(main())
Expected Result
The Sentry error event for RPC 2 should contain only breadcrumbs generated during RPC 2. It must not contain the gRPC error log from RPC 1. gRPC can still log the exception normally.
Actual Result
Output from the script above with the pinned versions:
RPC 1 event breadcrumbs: ['rpc:1']
RPC 2 event breadcrumbs: ['Unexpected [RuntimeError] raised by servicer method [/repro.Service/Fail]', 'rpc:2']
Reproduced: second RPC inherited first RPC error log
This differs from #5894, which fixed the absence of an async gRPC isolation_scope() in 2.59.0. In 2.68.1, Sentry captures the exception inside its per-handler scope and re-raises. After that scope exits, gRPC's outer _handle_exceptions logs Unexpected [...]. LoggingIntegration adds the record to the restored outer scope. A subsequent request forks that scope and inherits the breadcrumb.
A local application workaround clears the active Sentry request scope at the start of the RPC handler. It prevents the stale log from reaching the next RPC event, but also removes legitimate breadcrumbs added by middleware earlier in the current RPC. Is there a way for the integration to isolate the entire gRPC RPC task, including the framework's post-handler exception log, or to start the request scope without inherited breadcrumbs?
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 698
- Merge medio
- 1 d 3 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 158
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de getsentry/sentry-python
-
perf: Source context re-reads the whole file via loader.get_source() for every framePosiblemente ocupada @alexon1234 la tomó hace 14 días. AbiertoImprovement Python
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
getsentry/sentry-python#8089 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
fix(aws-lambda): Load handler module only once in the layerPosiblemente ocupada @pabloDeputter la tomó hace 7 días. AbiertoImprovement Integration: AWS Lambda Python Traces
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
getsentry/sentry-python#8079 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
fix(aws-lambda): Only set `messaging.batch.message_count` for messaging batchesQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. AbiertoImprovement Integration: AWS Lambda Python Traces
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
getsentry/sentry-python#8078 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
fix(boto3): Set `aws.dynamodb.item_collection_metrics` scrubbing to `auto`Posiblemente ocupada @pabloDeputter la tomó hace 7 días. AbiertoImprovement Integration: Boto3 Python Traces
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
getsentry/sentry-python#8074 · 1 comentario · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
`litellm`: Set request parametersQuizá libre de nuevo Un pull request para esta issue se cerró sin fusionarse. AbiertoImprovement Python Spans
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
getsentry/sentry-python#7994 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de getsentry/sentry-python
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
unionai-oss/pandera#2640 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
JdeRobot/RoboticsInfrastructure#843 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
automated endpoint-dead needs-curation
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
almanac-data/climate-almanac#122 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:harness enhancement
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
evarness-ai/iris-harness#420 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
suitenumerique/find#206 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días