Using multiple Slots within a Component

Abierto
#353 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
3/5
Tiempo estimado
1-2 días
Aptitud para principiantes
48/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Stack tecnológico
react, typescript

Línea de trabajo

Start with the Code Connect documentation and the implementation of figma.children and figma.instance to determine whether multiple named slots can be mapped independently. The issue provides no source files or tests to begin from, so first identify the relevant API entry points and existing slot tests. Done means documenting or supporting a clear way to connect both content and action slots in one component.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

feature request

I'll start by saying that I'm not developer and my knowledge of React and Code Connect has been self taught. I apologize if this can already be done and I'm just missing something...

We have a component where we have multiple Props that we are using Slots for:

<ComponentName
   content={}
   actions={}
/>

Here's an example of our figma.tsx

import { ComponentName } from '@something';
import  figma from `@figma/code-connect`;

const FigmaLink = "..."

const ComponentNameProps = {
   content: figma.boolean("Content", {
      false: undefined,
      true: figma.children('ContentSlot')
   }),
   action: figma.boolean("Action", {
      false: undefined,
      true: figma.children('ActionSlot')
   })
};

figma.connect(ComponentName, FigmaLink , {
   props: {
      ...ComponentNameProps,
   },
   example: ({ content, action }) => {
      return <ComponentName content={content} action={action} />;
   }
});

Note: we separate our Links and Props whenever we use different variant use case examples.

In previous cases where we used Slots, it was set as children with a catchall (figma.children('*')) and this works great. I'm struggling to find a way of implementing the Code Connect for these components without having to create subComponents using the catch all method:

I haven't tested this but this is what I would do in that case:

_ComponentNameContent and _ComponentNameAction:

import { Fragment } from '@something';
import  figma from `@figma/code-connect`;

figma.connect(
   Fragment,
   '...', 
   {
       props: {
           children: figma.children('*'),
       }.
       example: ({ children }) => (
           <Fragment>{children}</Fragment>
       )
   }
)

Then the Code Connect would be:

import { ComponentName } from '@something';
import  figma from `@figma/code-connect`;

const FigmaLink = "..."

const ComponentNameProps = {
   content: figma.boolean("Content", {
      false: undefined,
      true: figma.instance('_ComponentNameContent')
   }),
   action: figma.boolean("Action", {
      false: undefined,
      true: figma.children('_ComponentNameAction')
   })
};

figma.connect(ComponentName, FigmaLink , {
   props: {
      ...ComponentNameProps,
   },
   example: ({ content, action }) => {
      return <ComponentName content={content} action={action} />;
   }
});

Sorry if there's some errors, I had to type this all up from my personal computer since I don't have access to GH on my work computer. Does anyone have any thoughts/solutions?

Lenguaje dominante
TypeScript
Estrellas
1.6k
Forks
126
Métricas de merge de PR
Sin PR fusionados en 30 d

Preparar el entorno

Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de figma/code-connect

Todos los issues de figma/code-connect

Issues similares

Más issues de TypeScript

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.