Using multiple Slots within a Component
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 48/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Stack tecnológico
- react, typescript
- Área
- developer-experience
Línea de trabajo
Start with the Code Connect documentation and the implementation of figma.children and figma.instance to determine whether multiple named slots can be mapped independently. The issue provides no source files or tests to begin from, so first identify the relevant API entry points and existing slot tests. Done means documenting or supporting a clear way to connect both content and action slots in one component.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
I'll start by saying that I'm not developer and my knowledge of React and Code Connect has been self taught. I apologize if this can already be done and I'm just missing something...
We have a component where we have multiple Props that we are using Slots for:
<ComponentName
content={}
actions={}
/>
Here's an example of our figma.tsx
import { ComponentName } from '@something';
import figma from `@figma/code-connect`;
const FigmaLink = "..."
const ComponentNameProps = {
content: figma.boolean("Content", {
false: undefined,
true: figma.children('ContentSlot')
}),
action: figma.boolean("Action", {
false: undefined,
true: figma.children('ActionSlot')
})
};
figma.connect(ComponentName, FigmaLink , {
props: {
...ComponentNameProps,
},
example: ({ content, action }) => {
return <ComponentName content={content} action={action} />;
}
});
Note: we separate our Links and Props whenever we use different variant use case examples.
In previous cases where we used Slots, it was set as children with a catchall (figma.children('*')) and this works great. I'm struggling to find a way of implementing the Code Connect for these components without having to create subComponents using the catch all method:
I haven't tested this but this is what I would do in that case:
_ComponentNameContent and _ComponentNameAction:
import { Fragment } from '@something';
import figma from `@figma/code-connect`;
figma.connect(
Fragment,
'...',
{
props: {
children: figma.children('*'),
}.
example: ({ children }) => (
<Fragment>{children}</Fragment>
)
}
)
Then the Code Connect would be:
import { ComponentName } from '@something';
import figma from `@figma/code-connect`;
const FigmaLink = "..."
const ComponentNameProps = {
content: figma.boolean("Content", {
false: undefined,
true: figma.instance('_ComponentNameContent')
}),
action: figma.boolean("Action", {
false: undefined,
true: figma.children('_ComponentNameAction')
})
};
figma.connect(ComponentName, FigmaLink , {
props: {
...ComponentNameProps,
},
example: ({ content, action }) => {
return <ComponentName content={content} action={action} />;
}
});
Sorry if there's some errors, I had to type this all up from my personal computer since I don't have access to GH on my work computer. Does anyone have any thoughts/solutions?
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 126
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Preparar el entorno
Este proyecto no incluye contenedor de desarrollo, Dockerfile ni guía de contribución, así que la configuración corre por tu cuenta: empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de figma/code-connect
-
normalizePropName strips `#` characters from Figma property names instead of only the `#id` suffixAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
figma/code-connect#419 ·
-
feature request
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
figma/code-connect#403 ·
-
feature request
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
figma/code-connect#414 ·
-
feature request
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
figma/code-connect#413 · 1 comentario ·
-
feature request
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 54/100
figma/code-connect#412 · 1 comentario ·
Todos los issues de figma/code-connect
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
jeanibarz/knowledge-base-mcp-server#1268 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Koenkk/zigbee-herdsman-converters#13820 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
A live recovery copy treats a large whole number and text with the same digits as the same valueAbiertobug sharing & sync
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 64/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[prefer-expect-resolves] autofix leaves a stray ")" when the awaited expression is parenthesizedAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest#2052 ·