Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Profile for private / internal repositories

Abierto
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#458 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
32/100
Tipo de issue
Nueva funcionalidad
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
python
Área
devtools, security

Línea de trabajo

Start by reading the audit_openssf_baseline checks and the reported results for the private repository, focusing on the listed controls that are inapplicable or produce false positives. The issue proposes both a private profile and changes to several checks, so clarify the intended scope before starting. Done should mean the agreed profile handles private-repository controls appropriately and the identified false positives are addressed.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

module-baseline

Ran the OpenSSF Baseline audit (audit_openssf_baseline, level 3, OSPS v2026.02.19) against a private GitHub repository - a governance-first monorepo where every push carries signed evidence, main is behind a ruleset requiring PR + two status checks, actions are SHA-pinned, dependencies are exactly pinned and allowlisted, CODEOWNERS is in place. Result: 26 pass / 21 fail / 17 warn / 2 error. Most of the fails are the baseline being shaped for public open-source projects, which makes the score misleading for the growing class of private, agent-heavy repos that arguably need this tooling most.

Fails that don't apply to a private repo, or can't

  • OSPS-LE-01/03 LICENSE, GV-03 CONTRIBUTING, DO-03/04/05 SUPPORT / EOL / release verification, QA-02.02 SBOM in releases, DO-02 bug-report template - all release/community surface a private repo may legitimately not have (yet).
  • OSPS-VM-03.01 "enable private vulnerability reporting" - the GitHub feature is unavailable on private repos (/private-vulnerability-reporting returns 404). The check can't pass; it should be N/A or accept a SECURITY.md contact instead.

False positives worth fixing regardless of profile

  • OSPS-QA-05.01/05.02 "generated executables / binaries in repository" flagged 1,281 and 64,997 files - all under gitignored target/ and __pycache__/. The check scans the working tree; it should scan tracked files (git ls-files) or honour .gitignore.
  • OSPS-SA-01.01 "no architecture documentation" - the repo has design/*.md (component maps + an SDLC overview). The pattern seems to want ARCHITECTURE.md specifically.
  • OSPS-DO-06.01 "dependency management process not documented" - the repo has a reviewed dependency-allowlist.yaml with a per-dependency why: and a CI check that fails on any unlisted dependency. The pattern seems to want a prose DEPENDENCIES.md.

What a private profile could emphasise instead

The controls that actually distinguish a well-run private repo, several of which the baseline already has and which did pass here: branch protection with required checks (AC-*, BR-*), SHA-pinned actions, pinned + reviewed dependencies (BR-05/06), CODEOWNERS (GV-01/04), workflow linting (BR-01 via zizmor - which is also currently an ERROR: Command not found when zizmor isn't installed, rather than a skip with guidance), secret scanning, signed commits or signed evidence on push, and - increasingly relevant - distinct identities for automated/agent contributors, so "who authored this" is answerable.

Happy to provide the full JSON report or test a candidate profile against this repo.

Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
22
Forks
27
Merge medio
1 d 20 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
39

Preparar el entorno

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de darnitdevorg/darnit

Todos los issues de darnitdevorg/darnit

Issues similares

Más issues de Python

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.