Fuzz testing: research existing KMP/Kotlin ecosystem tooling
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 42/100
- Tipo de issue
- Documentación
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
Línea de trabajo
This is research for parent #981, not an implementation ticket. Start from the listed candidates (Jazzer, Jazzer.js, kotest property testing, JUnit/kotlin.test generators) and check which run on KMP source sets versus jvmTest only. Note how each reports coverage (JaCoCo-style, Gradle/CI wiring) and how other Kotlin/JVM OSS projects time-box fuzz jobs, persist corpora, and report crashes. Done is a short comparison comment or doc page so #981 can pick tools; do not implement fuzzing here. Companion #982 can run in parallel.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Sub-issue of #981 ("Enhance testing by adding fuzzing") — the R: RESEARCH phase for that
proposal. Survey what already exists in the Kotlin/KMP ecosystem before designing anything custom.
Goal
Answer "what can we reuse" before #981 gets to a design/implementation plan.
Tasks
- Fuzzing engines/harnesses for Kotlin/JVM: Jazzer
(JVM libFuzzer via coverage-guided bytecode instrumentation, the most mature option),
Jazzer.js if a JS/Wasm-side target
ever makes sense,kotlinxproperty-based testing options
(kotest property testing),
and plain JUnit/kotlin.test+ custom generators as a baseline comparison. - KMP-specific constraints: which of the above actually work across KMP source sets vs.
JVM-only — most fuzzing engines are JVM-bytecode-based (Jazzer) or Node-based (Jazzer.js),
so figure out realistic target-set scope (likelyjvmTestonly, at least initially) rather
than assuming multiplatform fuzzing is feasible. - Coverage measurement: how each candidate reports/measures coverage (Jazzer integrates
with JaCoCo-style coverage; check what's practical to wire into this repo's existing
Gradle/CI setup), and whether coverage-guided fuzzing (vs. blind random generation) is
achievable here. - CI integration patterns: how other Kotlin/JVM OSS projects run fuzzing in CI — as a
time-boxed job (e.g. N minutes/seeds per run, not exhaustive), corpus persistence between
runs (cached seed corpus so regressions aren't re-discovered from scratch), and how crashes
get reported/triaged (e.g. auto-filed issues vs. failing the build). - Reporting/eval: what output format(s) these tools produce (crash reproducers, minimized
inputs, coverage deltas) and whether any of it is consumable by this repo's existing docs/
Antora pipeline or needs a bespoke summary step. - OSS-Fuzz feasibility: whether SKaiNET could realistically be onboarded to
OSS-Fuzz (free continuous fuzzing for open-source
projects) given it already has Jazzer-based JVM project examples, as a longer-term option
beyond local/CI-only fuzzing.
Output
A short comparison write-up (as a comment on this issue, or a doc page) — not a recommendation
that's already implemented, just enough for #981 to make an informed tool choice.
Related
- Parent: #981
- Companion sub-issue (repo-state analysis, can run in parallel): #982
- Lenguaje dominante
- Kotlin
- Estrellas
- 52
- Forks
- 15
- Merge medio
- 1 d 8 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 37
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Sin plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET
-
coding good first issue platform size:xs skill:js sub-issue
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1232 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
compute-backend dsl/api enhancement size:m skill:kotlin-core skill:numerics
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 18/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1343 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
compute-backend dsl/api enhancement size:m skill:kotlin-core skill:numerics
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 12/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1342 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
skeep tracking
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 15/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1331 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
assessment size:s skill:review sub-issue
Dificultad 4/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 18/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1330 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
callstack/react-native-brownfield#492 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
fix: retain the best partial noise-correction solutionPosiblemente ocupada Un pull request vinculado a esta issue está abierto o ya se fusionó. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
world-federation-of-advertisers/cross-media-measurement#4653 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement help wanted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
kabirvashisht4-glitch/Vet#22 ·
-
documentation good first issue
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
djazairdev/wilayas#23 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día