Fuzz testing: research existing KMP/Kotlin ecosystem tooling
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 42/100
- Tipo di issue
- Documentazione
- Chiarezza
- Specificata chiaramente
- Stato di attività
- Tranquilla
- Ambito
- ai, developer-experience, machine-learning, testing, testing-qa, tooling
Direzione di ricerca
This is research for parent #981, not an implementation ticket. Start from the listed candidates (Jazzer, Jazzer.js, kotest property testing, JUnit/kotlin.test generators) and check which run on KMP source sets versus jvmTest only. Note how each reports coverage (JaCoCo-style, Gradle/CI wiring) and how other Kotlin/JVM OSS projects time-box fuzz jobs, persist corpora, and report crashes. Done is a short comparison comment or doc page so #981 can pick tools; do not implement fuzzing here. Companion #982 can run in parallel.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Sub-issue of #981 ("Enhance testing by adding fuzzing") — the R: RESEARCH phase for that
proposal. Survey what already exists in the Kotlin/KMP ecosystem before designing anything custom.
Goal
Answer "what can we reuse" before #981 gets to a design/implementation plan.
Tasks
- Fuzzing engines/harnesses for Kotlin/JVM: Jazzer
(JVM libFuzzer via coverage-guided bytecode instrumentation, the most mature option),
Jazzer.js if a JS/Wasm-side target
ever makes sense,kotlinxproperty-based testing options
(kotest property testing),
and plain JUnit/kotlin.test+ custom generators as a baseline comparison. - KMP-specific constraints: which of the above actually work across KMP source sets vs.
JVM-only — most fuzzing engines are JVM-bytecode-based (Jazzer) or Node-based (Jazzer.js),
so figure out realistic target-set scope (likelyjvmTestonly, at least initially) rather
than assuming multiplatform fuzzing is feasible. - Coverage measurement: how each candidate reports/measures coverage (Jazzer integrates
with JaCoCo-style coverage; check what's practical to wire into this repo's existing
Gradle/CI setup), and whether coverage-guided fuzzing (vs. blind random generation) is
achievable here. - CI integration patterns: how other Kotlin/JVM OSS projects run fuzzing in CI — as a
time-boxed job (e.g. N minutes/seeds per run, not exhaustive), corpus persistence between
runs (cached seed corpus so regressions aren't re-discovered from scratch), and how crashes
get reported/triaged (e.g. auto-filed issues vs. failing the build). - Reporting/eval: what output format(s) these tools produce (crash reproducers, minimized
inputs, coverage deltas) and whether any of it is consumable by this repo's existing docs/
Antora pipeline or needs a bespoke summary step. - OSS-Fuzz feasibility: whether SKaiNET could realistically be onboarded to
OSS-Fuzz (free continuous fuzzing for open-source
projects) given it already has Jazzer-based JVM project examples, as a longer-term option
beyond local/CI-only fuzzing.
Output
A short comparison write-up (as a comment on this issue, or a doc page) — not a recommendation
that's already implemented, just enough for #981 to make an informed tool choice.
Related
- Parent: #981
- Companion sub-issue (repo-state analysis, can run in parallel): #982
- Lingua principale
- Kotlin
- Stelle
- 52
- Fork
- 15
- Merge medio
- 1g 15h
- PR unite (30g)
- 36
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET
-
coding good first issue size:xs skill:kotlin-core sub-issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1323 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
coding good first issue platform size:xs skill:js sub-issue
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1232 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
skeep tracking
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 15/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1331 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
assessment size:s skill:review sub-issue
Difficoltà 4/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 18/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1330 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
documentation good first issue size:s skill:docs sub-issue
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 78/100
SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET#1329 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
Tutte le issue di SKaiNET-developers/SKaiNET
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 73/100
tortuvshin/open-apps#377 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 79/100
supabase-community/supabase-kt#1413 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 5 giorni
-
Type: Possible bug
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 72/100
spacecowboy/Feeder#1258 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
[Submission] 抖音火山版Apertasubmit-adaption submit-adaption-pre
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
BetterAndroid/android-notification-icon-project#744 · 1 commento ·
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 64/100
utopia-rise/godot-jvm#1004 ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno