switching memory off switches skills off, and the chat then denies the feature exists
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 58/100
Línea de trabajo
Start with importForeignSkillsBeforeFirstMessage in cmd/codeaf/chatv3.go:1169, then read renderSkillCatalog in internal/session/skillcatalog.go:64 and useSkillTool in internal/session/tools_skill.go:71. Trace both memory states through the real chat surface and the /skill picker. Done means memory-off users are told skills are switched off and the setting is named, while memory-on users see and can use the skill shelf.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
What happened
A person with eighty-one skills on disk asked the chat "can you use skills ?" and
was told:
If you meant skills in the Claude Code SKILL.md sense, codeaf has no such
mechanism — harnesses and the notebook are what it has instead.
The binary was built from the head that carries the skills wave and its manual
pages. The feature was there. The answer denies it exists.
Why
memory.enabled was off.
~/.codeaf/config.json memory.enabled = off
~/.codeaf/graph.db 59.7 MB, facts table: 0 rows
~/.claude/skills 40 direct-child SKILL.md
~/.agents/skills 41 direct-child SKILL.md
importForeignSkillsBeforeFirstMessage (cmd/codeaf/chatv3.go:1169) returns on
its first line when memory is nil. Nothing is recorded, so
renderSkillCatalog (internal/session/skillcatalog.go:64) reads an empty
shelf and emits zero bytes, and useSkillTool (internal/session/tools_skill.go:71)
withholds the verb. Every one of those is behaving as designed.
The model then has no shelf, no verb, and no sentence about either, so it
reasons from the silence and invents a denial.
The two defects
One. Skills are gated on a setting that names something else, and nothing says
so. A person switches memory off to stop the program remembering things about
them. They also switch off skills, and are not told. That is one decision
producing two outcomes with only one of them disclosed.
Two. "Absent because impossible here" and "absent because it does not exist"
are the same silence. The absent-not-broken law works: it stops a model
planning a reply around a call that can only refuse. It does not stop the model
reasoning from the silence and concluding the capability was never built. The
law needs a companion clause rather than an exception: WHEN A CAPABILITY IS
WITHHELD BY A SETTING, SOMETHING HAS TO SAY SO.
This is not the emptiness law's territory. That law is about a number nobody has
yet: draw nothing rather than $0.00. It was never a licence to hide the
difference between "you have no skills" and "skills are switched off here".
Replication
- A profile with
memory.enabled = offand any number of SKILL.md folders
under a scanned root. - Ask the chat whether it can use skills.
- It denies the feature exists, rather than saying it is switched off.
Acceptance
End to end, through the real surface, in BOTH states.
- With memory off: the answer says skills are switched off on this machine and
names the setting. It does not say codeaf has no such mechanism. - With memory on: the shelf is there and the answer is yes.
- The
/skillpicker with memory off says the same thing rather than drawing an
empty list.
Then whatever mechanism carries it. One candidate: the catalog emits a single
line when the store is absent and the roots are not, which costs a person with
no skills nothing, because that person has no roots either.
Not in scope
#1378 is the manual side: no heading answers the capability question in either
state. Fixing the sentence here does not fix retrieval there, and neither is a
substitute for the other.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 115
- Forks
- 14
- Merge medio
- 9 h 37 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 755
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1592 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:headless bug sev:critical
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1566 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat feature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:tests bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1489 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat bug good first issue sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1470 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issues similares
-
priority: low 🌱 type: enhancement 💅🏼
Dificultad 2/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
nebari-dev/llm-serving-pack#199 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
area/helm kind/bug priority/backlog triage/accepted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
lexfrei/cloudflare-tunnel-gateway-controller#889 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug difficulty: beginner documentation good first issue help wanted localization
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
wavefnd/wave-platform#140 ·
-
compiler/runtime
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
golang/go#81797 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día