Hacktoberfest 2026: những issue maintainer đã đánh dấu cho tháng Mười, đang mở và phù hợp người mới. Xem issue Hacktoberfest

switching memory off switches skills off, and the chat then denies the feature exists

Đang mở
  • Có gì không ổn?
#1,379 0 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub

Maintainer thường phản hồi trong vòng 1 ngày

Chưa có ai nhận issue này.

Đánh giá

Độ khó
4/5
Thời gian dự kiến
3-5 ngày
Mức phù hợp với người mới
58/100
Loại issue
Lỗi
Độ rõ ràng
Đặc tả rõ ràng
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Công nghệ
go
Lĩnh vực
cli

Hướng nghiên cứu

Start with importForeignSkillsBeforeFirstMessage in cmd/codeaf/chatv3.go:1169, then read renderSkillCatalog in internal/session/skillcatalog.go:64 and useSkillTool in internal/session/tools_skill.go:71. Trace both memory states through the real chat surface and the /skill picker. Done means memory-off users are told skills are switched off and the setting is named, while memory-on users see and can use the skill shelf.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Mô tả

area:session bug sev:serious

What happened

A person with eighty-one skills on disk asked the chat "can you use skills ?" and
was told:

If you meant skills in the Claude Code SKILL.md sense, codeaf has no such
mechanism — harnesses and the notebook are what it has instead.

The binary was built from the head that carries the skills wave and its manual
pages. The feature was there. The answer denies it exists.

Why

memory.enabled was off.

~/.codeaf/config.json   memory.enabled = off
~/.codeaf/graph.db      59.7 MB, facts table: 0 rows
~/.claude/skills        40 direct-child SKILL.md
~/.agents/skills        41 direct-child SKILL.md

importForeignSkillsBeforeFirstMessage (cmd/codeaf/chatv3.go:1169) returns on
its first line when memory is nil. Nothing is recorded, so
renderSkillCatalog (internal/session/skillcatalog.go:64) reads an empty
shelf and emits zero bytes, and useSkillTool (internal/session/tools_skill.go:71)
withholds the verb. Every one of those is behaving as designed.

The model then has no shelf, no verb, and no sentence about either, so it
reasons from the silence and invents a denial.

The two defects

One. Skills are gated on a setting that names something else, and nothing says
so. A person switches memory off to stop the program remembering things about
them. They also switch off skills, and are not told. That is one decision
producing two outcomes with only one of them disclosed.

Two. "Absent because impossible here" and "absent because it does not exist"
are the same silence. The absent-not-broken law works: it stops a model
planning a reply around a call that can only refuse. It does not stop the model
reasoning from the silence and concluding the capability was never built. The
law needs a companion clause rather than an exception: WHEN A CAPABILITY IS
WITHHELD BY A SETTING, SOMETHING HAS TO SAY SO.

This is not the emptiness law's territory. That law is about a number nobody has
yet: draw nothing rather than $0.00. It was never a licence to hide the
difference between "you have no skills" and "skills are switched off here".

Replication

  1. A profile with memory.enabled = off and any number of SKILL.md folders
    under a scanned root.
  2. Ask the chat whether it can use skills.
  3. It denies the feature exists, rather than saying it is switched off.

Acceptance

End to end, through the real surface, in BOTH states.

  • With memory off: the answer says skills are switched off on this machine and
    names the setting. It does not say codeaf has no such mechanism.
  • With memory on: the shelf is there and the answer is yes.
  • The /skill picker with memory off says the same thing rather than drawing an
    empty list.

Then whatever mechanism carries it. One candidate: the catalog emits a single
line when the store is absent and the roots are not, which costs a person with
no skills nothing, because that person has no roots either.

Not in scope

#1378 is the manual side: no heading answers the capability question in either
state. Fixing the sentence here does not fix retrieval there, and neither is a
substitute for the other.

Ngôn ngữ chính
Go
Star
115
Fork
14
Merge trung bình
9 giờ 37 phút
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
755

Chuẩn bị môi trường

Chúng tôi chưa kiểm tra các tệp thiết lập môi trường của dự án này. Hãy bắt đầu từ README và xem hướng dẫn đóng góp lần đầu của chúng tôi để biết các bước chung.

Bắt đầu từ đâu

  1. Đọc hết issue, rồi đọc hướng dẫn đóng góp của dự án.
  2. Bình luận trên issue rằng bạn sẽ nhận — tránh hai người làm cùng một việc.
  3. Fork repository và làm thay đổi trên một nhánh.
  4. Mở pull request có tham chiếu số hiệu của issue.

Issue khác của Agent-Field/CodeAF

Tất cả issue của Agent-Field/CodeAF

Issue tương tự

Thêm issue về Go

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.