standing: a firing's tasks board is always empty — wrong task index path + armed-firing scoping hide project tasks
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 55/100
Línea de trabajo
Start with internal/session/task_index.go:404, internal/session/standing_run.go:940-941, internal/session/tools_tasks.go:935, and internal/session/taskdelta.go:721. Reproduce a standing item that calls tasks, checking unarmed and armed firings plus id and scope=everywhere queries. Done means standing firings can see project tasks and eligible tasks in other windows through the promised task-tool paths.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
A standing-run firing that calls the tasks tool always sees an empty board, regardless of whether project tasks exist. Two independent root causes, both in internal/session, produce this: the task index file resolves to a wrong path for standing runs (cause A, bites unarmed firings), and an armed firing's task scoping hides project tasks behind graph-child-only lookups (cause B, bites the observed firing).
Reproduction
Create a standing item whose body calls tasks (with or without an id or scope argument) every 20 minutes. For example, a kind=task item monitoring three delegated tasks (ids 4, 5, 6) in the conversation that created the item. When the firing runs, every variant returns empty:
- No-query listing: "No tasks have run in this project yet."
scope=everywhere: equally empty.- Id lookups: No task "4" among the pieces you handed out.
...while those tasks are live and visible in the conversation that created the standing item.
Root causes
A -- Wrong task index path (task_index.go:404)
taskIndexFile() at internal/session/task_index.go:404 (filepath.Dir at :406) derives the index bucket as filepath.Dir(Place.Dir). For a normal conversation, Place.Dir is a session folder under ~/.codeaf/v3/projects/<workspace-hash>/, so one Dir() hop resolves to the correct project bucket. For a standing firing, Place.Dir is ~/.codeaf/v3/standing/<item-id>/runs/0001 (set at standing_run.go:773,778), so one hop lands in runs/ and ReadTaskIndex opens a tasks.jsonl that never exists there.
Cause A bites any standing firing whose taskRows() reaches TaskIndex() -- that is, when taskID == 0. For the observed armed firing (taskID != 0), cause B below was the active mechanism.
B -- Armed-firing scoping hides project tasks (standing_run.go:941, tools_tasks.go:935, taskdelta.go:721)
standingWideWork at internal/session/standing_run.go:940-941 arms the firing by setting cfg.taskID (and cfg.tasker) when the item divides (swarm on, brief passes the width gate at :884). With taskID != 0, taskRows() at internal/session/tools_tasks.go:935 returns only the root node's graph children -- which for a standing firing that has not divided is an empty slice -- and never calls TaskIndex() at all. Separately, tellsElsewhere() at internal/session/taskdelta.go:721 returns false when InTask || taskID != 0 (:722), preventing the scope=everywhere path from reaching taskElsewhereText (tools_tasks.go:256, gated at :260/268). Together these mean an armed firing cannot see conversation tasks by id, by query, or by any scope.
Why this is a bug, not intentional scoping
task_index.go:40-56 header comment states the scope is the project, not the conversation. The tasks tool contract (tasksDescription at internal/session/tools_tasks.go:72) promises that other windows' live work appears as anonymous "another window" rows. Both promises are broken for standing firings: project tasks are invisible, and live tasks in other windows never appear.
Suggested fix directions
Three changes needed:
-
Fix the index path (cause A). Derive the project bucket for standing runs directly instead of
filepath.Dir(Place.Dir)-- for example, walkPlace.Dirupward until thetasks.jsonlor the project bucket marker is found. -
Do not arm with an unmatchable taskID (cause B). Leave
cfg.taskIDat 0 for standing firings sotaskRows()falls through toTaskIndex(). This alone does not work without fix 1. -
Let
tellsElsewhere()return true for standing runs (or add a standing-specific path) so thatscope=everywhereworks.
Fix 1 alone does not cure cause B (an armed firing never reaches the index). Fix 2 alone (using fix 1's corrected index) is the full cure for both unarmed and armed firings but depends on fix 1. Fix 3 is independent of 1 and 2 and covers the elsewhere gate.
Workaround
Replace the kind=task standing item with a kind=probe item whose shell command greps the project's real tasks.jsonl directly at ~/.codeaf/v3/projects/<workspace-hash>/tasks.jsonl.
—
Drafted with CodeAF · reviewed and owned by the author
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 115
- Forks
- 14
- Merge medio
- 9 h 37 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 755
Preparar el entorno
Aún no hemos revisado los archivos de configuración de este proyecto. Empieza por su README y consulta nuestra guía para la primera contribución para los pasos generales.
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 86/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1592 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:headless bug sev:critical
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1566 · 1 asignado ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat feature
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:tests bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1489 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
area:chat bug good first issue sev:papercut
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1470 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issues similares
-
priority: low 🌱 type: enhancement 💅🏼
Dificultad 2/5 Medio día Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
nebari-dev/llm-serving-pack#199 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 3 días
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
-
area/helm kind/bug priority/backlog triage/accepted
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
lexfrei/cloudflare-tunnel-gateway-controller#889 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug difficulty: beginner documentation good first issue help wanted localization
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
wavefnd/wave-platform#140 ·
-
compiler/runtime
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
golang/go#81797 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día