standing: a firing's tasks board is always empty — wrong task index path + armed-firing scoping hide project tasks
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 55/100
Piste de recherche
Start with internal/session/task_index.go:404, internal/session/standing_run.go:940-941, internal/session/tools_tasks.go:935, and internal/session/taskdelta.go:721. Reproduce a standing item that calls tasks, checking unarmed and armed firings plus id and scope=everywhere queries. Done means standing firings can see project tasks and eligible tasks in other windows through the promised task-tool paths.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
A standing-run firing that calls the tasks tool always sees an empty board, regardless of whether project tasks exist. Two independent root causes, both in internal/session, produce this: the task index file resolves to a wrong path for standing runs (cause A, bites unarmed firings), and an armed firing's task scoping hides project tasks behind graph-child-only lookups (cause B, bites the observed firing).
Reproduction
Create a standing item whose body calls tasks (with or without an id or scope argument) every 20 minutes. For example, a kind=task item monitoring three delegated tasks (ids 4, 5, 6) in the conversation that created the item. When the firing runs, every variant returns empty:
- No-query listing: "No tasks have run in this project yet."
scope=everywhere: equally empty.- Id lookups: No task "4" among the pieces you handed out.
...while those tasks are live and visible in the conversation that created the standing item.
Root causes
A -- Wrong task index path (task_index.go:404)
taskIndexFile() at internal/session/task_index.go:404 (filepath.Dir at :406) derives the index bucket as filepath.Dir(Place.Dir). For a normal conversation, Place.Dir is a session folder under ~/.codeaf/v3/projects/<workspace-hash>/, so one Dir() hop resolves to the correct project bucket. For a standing firing, Place.Dir is ~/.codeaf/v3/standing/<item-id>/runs/0001 (set at standing_run.go:773,778), so one hop lands in runs/ and ReadTaskIndex opens a tasks.jsonl that never exists there.
Cause A bites any standing firing whose taskRows() reaches TaskIndex() -- that is, when taskID == 0. For the observed armed firing (taskID != 0), cause B below was the active mechanism.
B -- Armed-firing scoping hides project tasks (standing_run.go:941, tools_tasks.go:935, taskdelta.go:721)
standingWideWork at internal/session/standing_run.go:940-941 arms the firing by setting cfg.taskID (and cfg.tasker) when the item divides (swarm on, brief passes the width gate at :884). With taskID != 0, taskRows() at internal/session/tools_tasks.go:935 returns only the root node's graph children -- which for a standing firing that has not divided is an empty slice -- and never calls TaskIndex() at all. Separately, tellsElsewhere() at internal/session/taskdelta.go:721 returns false when InTask || taskID != 0 (:722), preventing the scope=everywhere path from reaching taskElsewhereText (tools_tasks.go:256, gated at :260/268). Together these mean an armed firing cannot see conversation tasks by id, by query, or by any scope.
Why this is a bug, not intentional scoping
task_index.go:40-56 header comment states the scope is the project, not the conversation. The tasks tool contract (tasksDescription at internal/session/tools_tasks.go:72) promises that other windows' live work appears as anonymous "another window" rows. Both promises are broken for standing firings: project tasks are invisible, and live tasks in other windows never appear.
Suggested fix directions
Three changes needed:
-
Fix the index path (cause A). Derive the project bucket for standing runs directly instead of
filepath.Dir(Place.Dir)-- for example, walkPlace.Dirupward until thetasks.jsonlor the project bucket marker is found. -
Do not arm with an unmatchable taskID (cause B). Leave
cfg.taskIDat 0 for standing firings sotaskRows()falls through toTaskIndex(). This alone does not work without fix 1. -
Let
tellsElsewhere()return true for standing runs (or add a standing-specific path) so thatscope=everywhereworks.
Fix 1 alone does not cure cause B (an armed firing never reaches the index). Fix 2 alone (using fix 1's corrected index) is the full cure for both unarmed and armed firings but depends on fix 1. Fix 3 is independent of 1 and 2 and covers the elsewhere gate.
Workaround
Replace the kind=task standing item with a kind=probe item whose shell command greps the project's real tasks.jsonl directly at ~/.codeaf/v3/projects/<workspace-hash>/tasks.jsonl.
—
Drafted with CodeAF · reviewed and owned by the author
- Langage dominant
- Go
- Étoiles
- 115
- Forks
- 14
- Merge moyen
- 9 h 44 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 766
Préparer son environnement
Nous n'avons pas encore vérifié les fichiers d'installation de ce projet. Commencez par son README, et consultez notre guide de la première contribution pour les étapes générales.
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
-
area:chat bug sev:papercut
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 86/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1592 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:headless bug sev:critical
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1566 · 1 personne assignée ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:chat feature
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 88/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1510 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:tests bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1489 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:chat bug good first issue sev:papercut
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
Agent-Field/CodeAF#1470 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de Agent-Field/CodeAF
Issues similaires
-
bug needs-triage
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 86/100
DataDog/dd-trace-go#5469 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
bug tests
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 88/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 72/100
l3montree-dev/devguard#3101 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:*of bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
oapi-codegen/oapi-codegen#2593 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
bug
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 85/100
DaoCloud/DaoCloud-docs#7432 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour