RFC: Generator functions
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Tech-Stack
- javascript
- Bereich
- compilers
Rechercherichtung
Read the compiler syntax, typing, Lambda, JavaScript output, editor support, gentype and reanalyze entry points; the issue gives no file paths. Start with the listed prerequisites #8932 and #8933, then trace existing async, await, for..of and try..finally handling. Done means sync and async generator syntax, typing, compilation and tooling work with tests, including yield* and the documented edge cases.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Summary
Add generator functions to ReScript: gen functions that compile to JavaScript function*, with yield, yield*, and async gen for async generators. They produce the Generator.t<'yield, 'return, 'next> and AsyncGenerator.t values the standard library already models (#8355).
let range = gen (start, stop) => {
for i in start to stop - 1 {
yield i
}
}
// range: (int, int) => Generator.t<int, unit, 'next>
for x of range(0, 3)->Generator.asIterable {
Console.log(x)
}
Motivation
- JavaScript parity. Generators are the last major JavaScript control-flow construct ReScript cannot express. Consuming them already works (
for..of,for await..of, theGeneratorandIteratormodules); producing them requires%raw. - Libraries built on generators. Structured concurrency and effect systems use generators as their programming model: Effection, redux-saga, Effect. None of them can be used from ReScript without writing the generator functions in JavaScript.
- Lazy sequences. Iterators over trees, paginated APIs and infinite sequences are most naturally written as generators.
The groundwork is in place: the iterator and generator types (#8355), for..of and for await..of, break/continue (#8348), and try..finally (#8931), which generators need because cancellation (return() on a generator, an early exit from for..of, halting an Effection task) reaches the generator only through finally blocks.
Syntax
let numbers = gen () => {
yield 1
yield 2
}
let all = gen () => {
yield* numbers() // delegates to another generator
yield 3
}
let lines = async gen file => {
let handle = await open_(file)
try {
while !handle->eof {
yield await handle->readLine
}
} finally {
await handle->close
}
}
genfunctions.genis a contextual prefix for arrow functions, likeasync:gen (x) => …,gen x => …,gen () => …, andasync gen (x) => ….genstays an ordinary identifier everywhere else, so existing code that usesgenas a name keeps working.gen (x) => …andgen x => …are syntax errors today.yield eyields a value.yield ()yieldsunit(JavaScript's bareyield).yieldbinds like JavaScript's:yield a + bisyield (a + b).yield* edelegates to another generator, as in JavaScript.yieldis a keyword only insidegenbodies, and an ordinary identifier elsewhere, including in normal functions nested in a generator, as in JavaScript. This keepsyield*unambiguous (it can't be read as a multiplication) without reserving a new keyword globally.
The arrow lookahead for async and gen must not apply in switch-guard position. Today | Some(x) if async(x) => 1 fails to parse, because async(x) => is taken as an async arrow. With gen this would break real code, since gen is a common function name. A function is never valid in a guard (guards are bool), so the parser can skip the lookahead there. That also fixes the async case (#8933).
Typing
Generator functions
A gen function's body is typed in a generator context holding a yield type 'y and a resume type 'n:
- Function: if the body has type
'r, with yield type'yand resume type'nin scope, thengen (x: 'a) => bodyhas type'a => Generator.t<'y, 'r, 'n>. - Yield: inside a generator with yield type
'yand resume type'n, ife : 'y, thenyield e : 'n. The value of ayieldexpression is what the consumer passes tonext(v)(Generator.nextValue). - Delegation: in the same context, if
g : Generator.t<'y, 'r2, 'n>, thenyield* g : 'r2. The inner generator's yield and resume types must match the outer ones; its return value becomes the value ofyield*. - Plain iterables: if
e : iterable<'y>ore : array<'y>, thenyield* e : unit. That's what built-in iterables return in JavaScript (undefined). - Outside a generator:
yieldandyield*are errors.
The context is entered by gen functions and reset by every other function boundary, the same way break/continue scoping works. It is not reset by finally blocks: yield inside finally is allowed (JavaScript allows it, and Effection relies on it for asynchronous cleanup), while break and continue out of finally stay rejected (#8931).
The return type is the type of the body's final expression, unit for a generator that just ends. When early return (#8656) is added, return e in a generator will also need e : 'r.
Async generators
async gen functions have type 'a => AsyncGenerator.t<'y, 'r, 'n>. Inside them, await is allowed, and yield e takes e : 'y, the same rule as in sync generators. To yield the result of a promise, write yield await p.
Caveat: in JavaScript, yield v in an async generator waits for v if it is a promise. A value of type promise<_> yielded directly would therefore reach the consumer already resolved, while the types say it's a promise. This is the same nested-promise problem promise<promise<_>> has today. Making it an error to yield a value whose type is a promise inside async gen would close it.
Why yield* matters
Every yield in a generator shares one resume type 'n. Generators that only produce values ('n is never used) are not affected. Generators that receive typed answers, such as sagas, would need 'n to be a union of all possible answers. yield* avoids that, because its value is the inner generator's return type, which is new for each call. That's the pattern typed-redux-saga uses in TypeScript, and the one Effection's whole API is built on:
// Effection bindings
type effect // internal; users never construct it
type operation<'a> = Generator.t<effect, 'a, unknown>
@module("effection") external sleep: int => operation<unit> = "sleep"
@module("effection") external spawn: (unit => operation<'a>) => operation<task<'a>> = "spawn"
@module("effection") external run: (unit => operation<'a>) => task<'a> = "run"
let main = run(gen () => {
let task = yield* spawn(gen () => {
yield* sleep(1000)
"done"
})
yield* Task.join(task) // string
})
operation is an alias of Generator.t, although Effection's operations are iterables rather than generators. The binding can't express that difference yet (see Future extensions).
Compilation
-
Lambda.
gensets ageneratorflag infunction_attribute, next toasync.yieldandyield*become primitives, which, likeawait, always count as having side effects. -
Optimizations. Generator functions are never inlined, and their self-calls are never turned into loops. Calling a generator function creates a generator object rather than running the body.
-
JavaScript. Generator functions are emitted as
function*(async:async function*), never as arrows, since JavaScript has no generator arrows. -
yieldandawaitmust never move into a function the compiler creates. One such case exists today and has to be fixed first: partial application puts its arguments inside the new closure. Withhused more than once,let h = add(await p, ...)compiles to
let h = (extra, extra$1) => add(await p, extra, extra$1);, anawaitinside a non-async arrow, which is a JavaScript syntax error. It also evaluates the argument on every call ofh. Arguments should be let-bound outside the closure, as the optional-argument path already does (#8932). Ayieldthere would fail the same way.
Editor support (hover, completion), gentype (the TypeScript mapping for Generator.t exists since #8355) and reanalyze need the usual updates. Reanalyze's termination analysis must accept while true { yield x }, and its exception analysis has to decide whether yield can throw (Generator.throwError throws into the generator at a yield).
Future extensions
These are not part of this proposal and can be added later without breaking anything.
Typed resume values (@yieldResult)
Libraries whose runtime answers each yielded effect with a value of a known type, like redux-saga, could mark their effect type:
@yieldResult
type effect<'res>
@module("redux-saga/effects")
external call: ('args => promise<'res>, 'args) => effect<'res> = "call"
let saga = gen () => {
let user = yield call(fetchUser, id) // user: user
}
With the marker, yield e : 'a whenever e : effect<'a>, the way await types promise<'a>. The library's runtime is trusted to answer correctly, just as the JavaScript runtime is trusted to resolve a promise<'a> with an 'a. Without the marker, libraries write one helper generator per effect kind that casts the resume value, and users delegate with yield*.
Iterables with a return type
iterable<'a> carries only the yield type, so yield* over a library iterable that isn't a generator (Effection's operations, Effect's effects) can't be given its result type honestly. A three-parameter iterable type, like TypeScript 5.6's Iterable<T, TReturn, TNext>, with Generator.t, IterableIterator.t and IteratorObject.t as private abbreviations of it, would allow yield* on any such iterable.
for..of over generators without asIterable
for x of g with g: Generator.t<…> currently fails ("expected iterable<'a>"), because Generator.t is a private abbreviation of iterable<'yield>. An implicit coercion in for..of (and in yield*'s plain-iterable rule) would remove the need for ->Generator.asIterable. This is independent of generator functions and could ship first.
Open questions
- The name of the
@yieldResultattribute. - Whether yielding a promise inside
async genshould be an error. - Whether reanalyze's exception analysis should treat
yieldas possibly throwing.
Plan
- Prerequisites, each a separate PR:
- #8932: let-bind partial-application arguments outside the generated closure. This fixes
awaitin partial applications today. - #8933: skip the arrow lookahead in switch guards. This fixes
if async(x) =>today. - Optionally: implicit coercion to
iterableinfor..of.
- #8932: let-bind partial-application arguments outside the generated closure. This fixes
- Generator functions: syntax, typing, Lambda and JS output, tests, tooling.
- Async generators.
- Later, as needed:
@yieldResult, iterables with a return type.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- OCaml
- Sterne
- 7.5k
- Forks
- 483
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 1 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 169
Entwicklungsumgebung
Startet den Dev-Container des Projekts im Browser, mit Ihrem eigenen GitHub-Konto.
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Hat eine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus rescript-lang/rescript
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 77/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8953 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 52/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8956 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 48/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8955 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 55/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8954 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 5/5 Über eine Woche Anfängerfreundlichkeit 35/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8947 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in rescript-lang/rescript
Ähnliche Issues
-
bug priority: P2
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
confirmed generated by fuzzer llvm:optimizations miscompilation
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
llvm/llvm-project#234325 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
grammar selfhost sev-3
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 62/100