Derive the .cmi / .cmt / .ast magic numbers instead of bumping them in every PR
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Tech-Stack
- ocaml
- Bereich
- compilers
Rechercherichtung
Start with compiler/ext/config.ml and inspect how the .cmi, .cmt, and .ast magic numbers are defined, then trace the serialized interfaces and release tooling described in the proposal. The work spans digest generation, release recording and counter updates, and possibly dev build suffixes and prefix changes. Done means release counters change only when serialized layouts change, outside tools can distinguish compatible releases, and the changelog notes the prefix change.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Problem
compiler/ext/config.ml holds hand-numbered magic numbers for .cmi (Caml1999I036), .cmt (Caml1999T043) and marshaled .ast files (ResImpl01315 / ResIntf01315). Every PR that changes a serialized type bumps them, so parallel PRs constantly conflict on the same lines. That's the same problem we had with CHANGELOG.md before fragments. There have been about 20 bumps since August.
The per-PR precision buys nothing:
- Rebuilds after a compiler change are driven by
bsc_hash, which both build systems store, not by the magic numbers. - Outside tools only ever see released versions, so intermediate bumps between two releases are invisible to them.
- A bump forgotten in a PR fails silently: mixing files across a layout change crashes in
Marshalinstead of giving a clean error.
The Caml1999 prefix is a separate problem. OCaml 5.5 uses Caml1999I037 / Caml1999T037, so our I036 is most likely a real OCaml release's .cmi number, and the next bump would collide with OCaml 5.5. An OCaml tool would then accept a ReScript .cmi and misread it, instead of rejecting it.
What outside tools need
Tools that read .cmi/.cmt files may rely on the magic number. They need:
- A stable number for each release.
- A change between releases only when the format may have changed, so they can tell that two releases share a format.
- Ordering, for "built by a newer compiler" checks (
cmi_format.mlalready uses it for its older/newer error).
Proposal
Bump the counters at release time, not in PRs:
- A dune rule computes a digest of the interfaces whose values are serialized. For
.cmithat istypes,path,ident,parsetree, …; for.cmtaddtypedtree; for.astit isparsetree. Prefer whole directories or dune's cmi digests over a hand-picked file list, which would go stale like manual bumps do. - A checked-in file records the counter and digest from the last release. PRs never touch it.
- The release script, or a CI check on release PRs, compares the current digest with the recorded one. If they differ, it bumps the counter and records the new digest. Comment-only edits cause harmless extra bumps.
- Optional: dev builds append the digest (e.g.
…037+3fa9c1d2), so mixing two dev builds that share a counter but differ in layout gives a clean error instead of a crash. Releases ship the bare counter. - Switch to our own prefixes (e.g.
ResCmi…/ResCmt…, like the.astnumbers already did), so OCaml tools reject our files. Note this in the changelog because outside tools will see it.
Not in scope: .cmj has no magic number yet, only a digest of its own content (js_cmj_format.ml has a TODO). It could get a counter under the same scheme. The frozen Parsetree0 PPX numbers (Caml1999M022 / N022) must never change and stay as they are.
Alternatives considered
- The compiler version as the magic number. Stable per release and never touched by PRs. However, it changes on every release even when the format didn't, it has no meaningful ordering across prereleases, and dev builds sharing a version can't detect a layout mismatch.
- A pure content digest. Exact and never conflicts, but outside tools can't see that two releases share a format, and there's no ordering.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- OCaml
- Sterne
- 7.5k
- Forks
- 483
- Ø Merge
- 21 Std. 8 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 183
Entwicklungsumgebung
Startet den Dev-Container des Projekts im Browser, mit Ihrem eigenen GitHub-Konto.
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Hat eine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus rescript-lang/rescript
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8996 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8997 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 55/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8995 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
rescript-lang/rescript#8994 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Issues from differential semantic drift analysis (a7721303 to b123b7c3)Evtl. vergeben @cknitt hat das heute übernommen. Offen
rescript-lang/rescript#8980 · 1 zugewiesene Person ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Alle Issues in rescript-lang/rescript
Ähnliche Issues
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 83/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
bug P2
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 74/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
duplicate
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
numba/numba#10939 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Quantinuum/tket#2255 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
REPL and --show-tokens abort with "Token conversion not implemented yet" on .xor., byte and in outOffenbug low priority tokenizer
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag