pySCG section 09 Cryptography: providing building blocks in context with sign, encrypt, key-handling
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100
- Issue-Typ
- Dokumentation
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- documentation, security
Rechercherichtung
Read the existing section 08 rule pyscg-0056 and the linked 07 Concurrency introduction for the guide’s structure. The issue proposes a new 09 Cryptography introduction and individual rules, including moving pyscg-0053 and adding several cryptography topics, but does not identify files or define the final scope. Done means the section provides shared concepts and building-block guidance for sign, encrypt, key handling, and the related rules.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
The write up of new rule pyscg-0056: Verify Downloaded Code Before Running It currently in section 08_coding_standard showed us that
- new designers don't understand some of the key concepts such as 'payload' and 'digest'.
- complexity of using signed software as per 0056 is actually to impractical without additional python modules.
So we need to explain cryptographic basic concepts in 09_Cryptography and also unload complexity from 0056 and move 0053 under section 09.
Historically we have seen similar need for crypto blocks during pyscg-0023: Secure Deserialization we decided that we don't want partial explanations for an overall solution to sign, encrypt, key-handling in individual rules. Instead we want to create of find a introduction to how security can work in Python explaining 'building block' on the road to overall security solutions in the new 09 Cryptography section consisting of:
- A introduction page explaining common concepts across all rules in the section similar to what we do in 07 Concurrency
- Details and examples on 'building blocks' in individual rules
Related issues:
- pySCG: New Python specific rule that promotes signed software, CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check that requires potential solid building blocks for but like to have a CWE-494 very early on in the guide to bring new designers early onto the path of using only signed software without actually having a full understanding of
On how to create a learning resource consider:
cryptography.iosource: If It Ain't Broken, Do Fix It 21:44 min in- https://opensource.net/security-cryptography-algorithms-python/
Suggested Building blocks for rules in 09 Cryptography:
| Building block / rule | Stdlib? + Refs |
|---|---|
| 09 Cryptography - Introduction Introduces the security goals and mental model for the section: confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, trust anchoring, safe composition, and why the rules build from primitives toward signed software and provenance. |
No - If It Ain't Broken, Do Fix It - Security and Cryptography Algorithms in Python |
| pyscg-0038: Use Sufficiently Random Values Cryptographically secure randomness for tokens, nonces, and secret material |
Yes - PEP 506 - secrets |
| TODO — pyscg-0057: Use Cryptographic Hashes for Integrity Checks Digest computation, file integrity checks, and pinned-digest verification as a minimal integrity mechanism |
Yes - hashlib |
| TODO — pyscg-0058: Compare Security-Critical Values in Constant Time Constant-time comparison during verification; this is comparison hygiene, not HMAC itself |
Yes - hmac |
| TODO — pyscg-0059: Use Keyed Message Authentication for Shared-Secret Integrity MAC/HMAC, shared-secret authenticity and integrity, and why this does not solve publisher provenance or public software distribution |
Yes - hmac- hashlib |
| TODO — pyscg-0060: Derive Keys Securely from Passwords PBKDF2 / scrypt, salts, work factors, and deriving keys from passwords instead of using raw passwords directly |
Yes - hashlib |
| TODO — pyscg-0061: Use TLS with Certificate Validation on Network Interfaces Normal TLS client/server use on application interfaces: CA trust, hostname validation, presenting certificates on service interfaces, and basic mutual TLS concepts |
Yes - ssl |
| TODO — pyscg-0062: Use Authenticated Encryption Instead of Ad-Hoc Encryption Plus Integrity AEAD and why confidentiality and integrity should be combined in a single construction instead of assembled ad hoc |
No - cryptography AEAD |
| TODO — pyscg-0063: Use Digital Signatures for Publisher-Verifiable Authenticity Signatures vs HMAC, public/private key model, and authenticity for software distributed to many consumers |
No - cryptography asymmetric algorithms |
| TODO — pyscg-0064: Validate X.509 Certificates and Chains Outside TLS Handshakes Standalone certificate parsing, certificate-chain inspection, path validation, trust anchors, and policy checks outside a live TLS handshake |
No - cryptography X.509 tutorial - cryptography X.509 verification |
| TODO — pyscg-0065: Verify Package Provenance and Publisher Identity with Index-Hosted Attestations PEP 740, PyPI attestations, publisher identity, provenance objects, and package-index-level verification of signed software |
No - PEP 740 - PyPI attestations docs - pypi-attestations |
| TODO — pyscg-0066: Verify Attestation Signatures and Transparency Evidence DSSE envelopes, signing certificates, transparency log entries, trust roots, and verification policy underlying attestation systems |
No - PEP 740 - PyPI attestations docs - Sigstore |
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 2
- Forks
- 2
- Ø Merge
- 11 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 2
Entwicklungsumgebung
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Keine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus ossf/python-secure-coding-guide
-
pyscg-0051 should use a context managerEvtl. vergeben @s19110 hat das vor 8 Tagen übernommen. Offenbug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 68/100
ossf/python-secure-coding-guide#1 · 4 Kommentare · 1 zugewiesene Person ·
-
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 65/100
ossf/python-secure-coding-guide#29 · 1 Kommentar ·
-
Schwierigkeit 5/5 Über eine Woche Anfängerfreundlichkeit 25/100
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 25/100
-
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 25/100
Alle Issues in ossf/python-secure-coding-guide
Ähnliche Issues
-
documentation type/bug
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
add entry to blockOffen
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 65/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3299 ·
-
`garak --report` overwrites the input report when its name has no ".report"Evtl. vergeben @0z5a hat das heute übernommen. Offenneeds-triage
Schwierigkeit 2/5 Ein halber Tag Anfängerfreundlichkeit 72/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen
-
trace: Pi's 1-hour cache writes are priced at 1.25x, but billed at 2xEvtl. vergeben @Shizoqua hat das heute übernommen. Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
microsoft/TokenEconomizer#221 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
plot_graph crashes when a mesh node has no m2m edgeEvtl. vergeben @tygvi hat das heute übernommen. Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
mllam/neural-lam#883 · 1 Kommentar ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 2 Tagen