pySCG section 09 Cryptography: providing building blocks in context with sign, encrypt, key-handling
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Accessibilité débutants
- 35/100
- Type d'issue
- Documentation
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Activité
- Calme
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- documentation, security
Piste de recherche
Read the existing section 08 rule pyscg-0056 and the linked 07 Concurrency introduction for the guide’s structure. The issue proposes a new 09 Cryptography introduction and individual rules, including moving pyscg-0053 and adding several cryptography topics, but does not identify files or define the final scope. Done means the section provides shared concepts and building-block guidance for sign, encrypt, key handling, and the related rules.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
The write up of new rule pyscg-0056: Verify Downloaded Code Before Running It currently in section 08_coding_standard showed us that
- new designers don't understand some of the key concepts such as 'payload' and 'digest'.
- complexity of using signed software as per 0056 is actually to impractical without additional python modules.
So we need to explain cryptographic basic concepts in 09_Cryptography and also unload complexity from 0056 and move 0053 under section 09.
Historically we have seen similar need for crypto blocks during pyscg-0023: Secure Deserialization we decided that we don't want partial explanations for an overall solution to sign, encrypt, key-handling in individual rules. Instead we want to create of find a introduction to how security can work in Python explaining 'building block' on the road to overall security solutions in the new 09 Cryptography section consisting of:
- A introduction page explaining common concepts across all rules in the section similar to what we do in 07 Concurrency
- Details and examples on 'building blocks' in individual rules
Related issues:
- pySCG: New Python specific rule that promotes signed software, CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check that requires potential solid building blocks for but like to have a CWE-494 very early on in the guide to bring new designers early onto the path of using only signed software without actually having a full understanding of
On how to create a learning resource consider:
cryptography.iosource: If It Ain't Broken, Do Fix It 21:44 min in- https://opensource.net/security-cryptography-algorithms-python/
Suggested Building blocks for rules in 09 Cryptography:
| Building block / rule | Stdlib? + Refs |
|---|---|
| 09 Cryptography - Introduction Introduces the security goals and mental model for the section: confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, trust anchoring, safe composition, and why the rules build from primitives toward signed software and provenance. |
No - If It Ain't Broken, Do Fix It - Security and Cryptography Algorithms in Python |
| pyscg-0038: Use Sufficiently Random Values Cryptographically secure randomness for tokens, nonces, and secret material |
Yes - PEP 506 - secrets |
| TODO — pyscg-0057: Use Cryptographic Hashes for Integrity Checks Digest computation, file integrity checks, and pinned-digest verification as a minimal integrity mechanism |
Yes - hashlib |
| TODO — pyscg-0058: Compare Security-Critical Values in Constant Time Constant-time comparison during verification; this is comparison hygiene, not HMAC itself |
Yes - hmac |
| TODO — pyscg-0059: Use Keyed Message Authentication for Shared-Secret Integrity MAC/HMAC, shared-secret authenticity and integrity, and why this does not solve publisher provenance or public software distribution |
Yes - hmac- hashlib |
| TODO — pyscg-0060: Derive Keys Securely from Passwords PBKDF2 / scrypt, salts, work factors, and deriving keys from passwords instead of using raw passwords directly |
Yes - hashlib |
| TODO — pyscg-0061: Use TLS with Certificate Validation on Network Interfaces Normal TLS client/server use on application interfaces: CA trust, hostname validation, presenting certificates on service interfaces, and basic mutual TLS concepts |
Yes - ssl |
| TODO — pyscg-0062: Use Authenticated Encryption Instead of Ad-Hoc Encryption Plus Integrity AEAD and why confidentiality and integrity should be combined in a single construction instead of assembled ad hoc |
No - cryptography AEAD |
| TODO — pyscg-0063: Use Digital Signatures for Publisher-Verifiable Authenticity Signatures vs HMAC, public/private key model, and authenticity for software distributed to many consumers |
No - cryptography asymmetric algorithms |
| TODO — pyscg-0064: Validate X.509 Certificates and Chains Outside TLS Handshakes Standalone certificate parsing, certificate-chain inspection, path validation, trust anchors, and policy checks outside a live TLS handshake |
No - cryptography X.509 tutorial - cryptography X.509 verification |
| TODO — pyscg-0065: Verify Package Provenance and Publisher Identity with Index-Hosted Attestations PEP 740, PyPI attestations, publisher identity, provenance objects, and package-index-level verification of signed software |
No - PEP 740 - PyPI attestations docs - pypi-attestations |
| TODO — pyscg-0066: Verify Attestation Signatures and Transparency Evidence DSSE envelopes, signing certificates, transparency log entries, trust roots, and verification policy underlying attestation systems |
No - PEP 740 - PyPI attestations docs - Sigstore |
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 2
- Forks
- 2
- Merge moyen
- 11 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 2
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Aucun modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de ossf/python-secure-coding-guide
-
pyscg-0051 should use a context managerPeut-être pris @s19110 l’a pris il y a 8 jours. Ouvertebug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
ossf/python-secure-coding-guide#1 · 4 commentaires · 1 personne assignée ·
-
Difficulté 3/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 65/100
ossf/python-secure-coding-guide#29 · 1 commentaire ·
-
Difficulté 5/5 Plus d'une semaine Accessibilité débutants 25/100
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 25/100
-
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 25/100
Toutes les issues de ossf/python-secure-coding-guide
Issues similaires
-
README Quick Start query command fails, and doctor points to a missing Prerequisites sectionOuvertedocumentation type/bug
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
add entry to blockOuverte
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 65/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3299 ·
-
`garak --report` overwrites the input report when its name has no ".report"Peut-être pris @0z5a l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverteneeds-triage
Difficulté 2/5 Une demi-journée Accessibilité débutants 72/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours
-
trace: Pi's 1-hour cache writes are priced at 1.25x, but billed at 2xPeut-être pris @Shizoqua l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
microsoft/TokenEconomizer#221 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
plot_graph crashes when a mesh node has no m2m edgePeut-être pris @tygvi l’a pris aujourd’hui. Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
mllam/neural-lam#883 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 2 jours