Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

v26.13.0 Darwin tarball binaries are not notarized

Offen
  • Stimmt etwas nicht?
#4,545 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
1-2 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
47/100
Issue-Typ
Bug
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
macos
Bereich
release

Rechercherichtung

Start by checking the macOS release packaging job and the post-notarization check referenced in #4527, then compare how it handles the pkg and Darwin tarball binaries. Determine why the v26.13.0 arm64 and x64 tarballs lack notarization tickets while the pkg and v26.12.1 tarball are notarized. Done means both existing tarball binaries are registered with Apple without changing their SHAs.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

I was chasing down a sudden performance regression in a tool that spawns a lot of child processes, and ended up narrowing it to notarization issues with the 26.13.0 macOS tarballs.

The missing notarization sends Gatekeeper / syspolicyd into conniptions: in any process tree launched through a #!/bin/sh bin shim (so every npm/pnpm CLI), syspolicyd logs violates validation category policy. This will likely result in a block in the future and does a full trust evaluation on every process event. That adds ~3.5 ms to every posix_spawn attempt libuv makes while walking PATH, so a child_process spawn by bare name goes from ~10 ms to ~70 ms. Node 22, 24 and 26.12.1 binaries on the same machine are fine.

The bin/node binaries in the published node-v26.13.0-darwin-arm64.tar.gz and node-v26.13.0-darwin-x64.tar.gz are Developer ID signed but have no notarization ticket. node-v26.13.0.pkg is notarized and stapled. The darwin-arm64 tarball binary from v26.12.1 does have a ticket, so this looks specific to the v26.13.0 release build rather than to tarballs in general.

Quick check:

for v in v26.13.0 v26.12.1; do
  curl -fsSLO "https://nodejs.org/dist/$v/node-$v-darwin-arm64.tar.gz"
  tar -xzf "node-$v-darwin-arm64.tar.gz" "node-$v-darwin-arm64/bin/node"
  codesign --verify --verbose=2 -R='notarized' "node-$v-darwin-arm64/bin/node"
done

This logs:

node-v26.13.0-darwin-arm64/bin/node: valid on disk
node-v26.13.0-darwin-arm64/bin/node: satisfies its Designated Requirement
test-requirement: code failed to satisfy specified code requirement(s)
node-v26.12.1-darwin-arm64/bin/node: valid on disk
node-v26.12.1-darwin-arm64/bin/node: satisfies its Designated Requirement
node-v26.12.1-darwin-arm64/bin/node: explicit requirement satisfied

Same for the x64 tarball.

This may be related to #4527, where the post-notarization check in the macOS release-pkg job intermittently reported source=Unnotarized Developer ID. The retry loop there wraps the pkg check, so the tarball binaries may have slipped past it.

As far as I understand it, fixing this doesn't require changing the published tarballs: submitting a zip of each existing bin/node to notarytool registers its CDHash with Apple, and Gatekeeper looks tickets up by hash, so the SHAs stay the same. Would that be possible so people don't have to tiptoe around 26.13.0?

(Not sure if this belongs here or in nodejs/node. Apologies if I guessed wrong.)

Vorherrschende Sprache
Jinja
Sterne
544
Forks
184
Ø Merge
3 T. 12 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
7

Entwicklungsumgebung

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus nodejs/build

Alle Issues in nodejs/build

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Release

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.